|
Ultrasound has
been used to measure fat depth in beef cattle since the 1950's. Modern
ultrasound technology can also measure ribeye area. This allows carcass
composition to be evaluated more accurately. Research at the University of Saskatchewan
indicates that ultrasound backfat and ribeye area measurements can accurately predict the
lean meat yield of yearling bulls. This technology can be a valuable tool for seedstock
producers interested in improving the carcass merit of their cattle.
Carcass traits are moderately to highly heritable. This means that the
carcass characteristics of a bull will be passed on to his progeny, similar to average
daily gain or weight per day of age. Furthermore, research indicates that there is as much
variation within a breed as there is between breeds. Ultrasound technology allows a
potential herd sire's carcass merit to be evaluated directly. This is faster and more cost
effective than progeny testing.
Accuracy
These measurements have been collected and analyzed by technicians
certified by the Animal Ultrasound Practitioners Association (AUP). Together with the Beef
Improvement Federation (BIF), the AUP holds a clinic in which ultrasound technicians from
across North America are tested for their ability to produce repeatable and accurate fat
depth, ribeye area and intramuscular fat measurements in beef cattle. Technicians who meet
predetermined standards are accredited by the AUP. Data collected by these technicians is
accepted by some breed associations for use in EPDs.
What Do Ultrasound Measurements Tell Us?
Bull test indexes are based on average daily gain and weight per day of
age. Ultrasound measurements go one step further, and indicate whether bulls are growing
muscle (high lean meat yield) or fat (low lean meat yield).
|
Fat Depth
The fat depth (USFAT; mm) measurement is important for several reasons. Firstly, fat depth
influences lean meat yield. Fat bulls have less lean meat in the carcass. Secondly, the
fat measurement gives an indication of the bull's fleshing ability. Calves from a bull
with no fat may finish too slowly in the feedlot. Body condition score (fat depth) in
females is related to their ability to reach puberty at an early
age, produce milk, rebreed, and maintain a short calving interval. On the other hand,
bulls carrying excessive fat may suffer reduced fertility if not managed properly prior to
the breeding season. In other words, extremely fat (low cutability) and extremely lean
(high cutability) bulls are undesirable, regardless of the breeding objectives. Moderation
is the key.
|
 |
Ribeye Area and Weight Adjusted Ribeye Area
The ribeye is the largest muscle in the body, so ribeye area
(USREA; cm2) gives an
indication of overall carcass muscling. However, ribeye area is influenced by body weight.
Within a breed, the largest ribeye muscle often belongs to the heaviest bull. As a result,
ribeye area is also expressed on a weight adjusted basis (WREA;
in2/100lbs). Adjusting ribeye area for body
weight helps to determine which bulls are more muscular and which bulls are simply
heavier.
Cutability
Cutability (USLEAN; % Lean Meat Yield) is the
percentage lean meat yield in the carcass. Yield grade is an important
factor in both Canada and the US. Producing calves with a high genetic
potential for this trait can be an important objective of a breeding
program.
What Cattle Should I Scan?
As with all traits, the more cattle that are measured, the more accurate
and useful the genetic information will be. Ideally, all calves should be scanned at 12
months, regardless of whether they are to be sold, retained or culled. Picking and
choosing which calves will be scanned can produce misleading results. Some breeders prefer
to simply scan their bull calves to provide carcass information to their customers. In
addition, since bulls typically produce more offspring than heifers, they tend to have a
greater overall genetic impact. However, collecting heifer measurements will provide
information about the genetics that are going back into your own herd as replacements.
When Should I Scan?
Cattle should be scanned as close as possible to one year of age (12 to
14 months). There are two reasons for this recommendation. Firstly, this is the age at
which their progeny will likely begin to go to slaughter. Secondly, it a convenient time
to scan, since post-weaning performance evaluations and structural and reproductive
soundness exams are typically conducted at this age. There has been limited interest in
scanning two year old bulls. However, these measurements cannot be compared to
measurements collected on yearling bulls because they are at vastly different stages of
maturity. Measuring two-year old bulls is not recommended, and these numbers cannot be
used in a genetic evaluation. As well, the main advantage of ultrasound measurements is
that they can be used to evaluate a bull before he is used for breeding. Waiting until a
bull is two years old defeats this purpose.
Using Ultrasound Measurements in a Breeding Program
As with all genetic traits, ultrasound measurements should only be
compared among animals of similar age and breed that have been managed under the same
environment. Research at the University of Saskatchewan indicates that age adjustment of
ultrasound measurement is of little benefit for comparing spring-born bulls, since there
is little age variation to begin with. Since genetic improvement comes from within-breed
selection, comparing measurements of individual animals from two different breeds is of
little value. Finally, as with growth rate, carcass composition is partly dependent on the
feeding program. Consequently, it is misleading to compare the ultrasound traits of bulls
that have been developed on different rations. Until EPDs are developed for ultrasound
traits, these measurements should only be used for comparing bulls within a breed at the
same farm or test station.
Currently, the American Hereford Association and American Angus
Association are developing EPDs for carcass trait based on ultrasound measurements. The
importance of ultrasound measurements may increase in Canada as the trend towards North
American EPDs continues.
|
Other Ultrasound Measurements
There are a variety of computer programs that have been developed to
evaluate intramuscular fat percentage (ie marbling) based on analysis of real-time
ultrasound images. These measurements are
typically used more widely in the US, where the grading system and carcass value is based
primarily on quality (marbling) grade.
A second system uses ultrasound information along with breed type,
weight, frame score and estimated rate of gain to predict days on feed to a constant yield
(lean meat yield) or quality (marbling) grade. If carcass weight and grade discounts are
included, the optimum slaughter date can be predicted. This program has been developed for
sorting feedlot cattle into carcass grade outcome groups.
|
 |
Summary
The importance of carcass trait information will increase as value based
marketing and quality assurance programs become more widespread. However, many other
traits such as reproductive performance, structural soundness, calving ease, growth rate
and birth, weaning and yearling weights must also be considered when incorporating carcass
traits into a breeding program. Single trait selection is always discouraged. Moderation
and balance are key ingredients of a successful breeding program.
|