
The border closure has had dramatic impact on the Manitoba dairy industry. Loss of revenue due to depressed replacement prices have been considerable. There are currently initiatives to increases the provinces slaughter capacity. In the interim there are many more animals on farm than is needed and the logic of keeping older cows because the cull market is reduced is questionable.
To date there has been no ruling on breeding stock under or over 30 months of age moving across the border. Tentatively the ban is scheduled for 7 years therefore speculation of a border opening to replacement stock is not advised
The cost of raising heifers depends on a number of factors linked to farm type, feed and management ability. Most producers tend to underestimate the cost of raising heifers as they only consider feed costs. Although considerable, feed costs represent less than half of the cost associated with raising heifers. Table 1 below details 2 estimates of the cost of raising a heifer to calving at 24 months of age.
Table 1. Breakdown of heifer raising cost to calve at 24 months of age
|
Costs |
Manitoba |
Ontario |
|
Feed |
781 |
566 |
|
Other operating costs |
876 |
520 |
|
Fixed costs |
202 |
305 |
|
Labor |
240 |
531 |
|
Total |
$2099 |
$1922 |
The
price of bred replacements currently is in the $800-1200 range, down
from above $2500 in March 2003. However, the cost of raising heifers
has remained unchanged therefore the extra expense of raising heifers on
farm if it costs approx $2000 are in the range of $800-1200 per animal.
Consider a situation where the bought in heifer is of lower genetic merit and will therefore have significantly lower potential milk yield. As an example it would be the difference between the bottom 25 and the top 10% of Manitoba herds reporting to DHI. The difference in yields for 2004 was 2697 L.
To recoup the costs the home grown heifer must survive in the herd for 3 lactations to break even.
There is a long term value to improved genetics. Keeping replacements from lower quality bought in animals will ultimately be counterproductive to farm profitability. The border will eventually open and it will be producers with higher quality stock that will gain the maximum benefit.
There are also availability issues as heifers will not be available on demand but subject to other market forces. Finally bought in animals pose a real disease risk for herds and effort should be placed upon sourcing disease free, vaccinated replacements
Replacement needs depend on farms breeding programs culling rates and saleable heifers.
A recent study used a direct programming model of a 100 cow herd using average US Heard record data (Tozer & Heinrichs 2001. J. Dairy Sci. 84:1836-1844). The program was able to calculate the number of additional replacements needed under various culling, mortality and breeding situations. The researchers varied the following parameters:
Calving interval significantly affected the number of additional (i.e. bought in) replacements needed on a yearly basis (Table 2). At Manitoba calving intervals and culling rates of 25-30% the model estimated 10 additional heifers need to be purchased.
Table 2. Number of replacements needed under different calving
intervals, culling and heifer mortality rates
(100 cow herd, calving
interval is 13 months)
| Calving Interval |
Heifer Mortality |
Culling Rate |
|||
| 20% | 25% | 30% | 35% | ||
| 13 months | 10 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 9 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | |
| 20 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 11 | |
| 25 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 13 | |
| 15 months | 10 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 12 |
| 15 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 | |
| 20 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 14 | |
| 25 | 1 | 6 | 11 | 16 | |
Age at
first calving had minimal effect upon the numbers of additional
replacements needed if calving interval was kept at 13 months. Table 3
details this with figures equivalent to Manitoba being underlined.
Table
3. Number of additional replacements needed per year at different first
calving ages, culling and heifer mortality rates
(100 cow herd, calving
interval is 13 months)
|
Age at First Calving |
Heifer Mortality |
Culling Rate |
|||
|
20% |
25% |
30% |
35% |
||
|
25 months |
10 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
9 |
|
15 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
|
|
20 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
11 |
|
|
25 |
0 |
3 |
8 |
13 |
|
|
29 months |
10 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
|
15 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
11 |
|
|
20 |
0 |
3 |
8 |
13 |
|
|
25 |
0 |
4 |
9 |
14 |
|
The
model also provided relevant information about the portion of raising
costs attributed to each factor. Reducing the age of first calving by 1
month gives 4.3% reduction in heifer raising costs whereas
reducing culling rate by 1% gives a 3.8% reduction . A 1 % decrease in
culling rate is equivalent to 1 cow in a 100 cow facility has a
far greater impact on raising costs. This strongly suggests that
producers should concentrate on the major factors influencing culling
decisions on farm as this has a far greater return than closely managing
heifers to calve at 24 months.
Based on 2004 DHI records for Manitoba the major reasons for culling were:
Reproduction
Mastitis
Milk yield
Lameness
Udder conformation
Other31%
16%
12%
10%
12%
19%
Consider investing in synchronized breeding management, heat detection
technology and improved dry cow therapy to reduce culling rates on your
farm.
The alternative option with low bought in heifer prices is to increase the level of voluntary culling in the herd.
A lower genetic merit herd can vastly improve yields and future profitability by culling below average cows and replacing with high genetic merit cattle at reasonable prices. This greatly speeds up the rate of genetic improvement typically seen on farms.
Herds with endemic levels of Staph. aureus can also benefit. Staph. aureus is a contagious mastitis bacteria with notoriously poor cure rates. Most of the problems occur with older animals with established infections Depending on the number of cows infected culling can be a viable economic option to eliminate Staph. aureus from the herd is heifers can be bought for lower than $1500.
At present the net loss from raising a heifer on farm and buying an equivalent in calf heifer in is approximately $1000.
Prepared by:
Rob Berry
Dairy Cattle Specialist
Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives
For further information please refer to the: Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives Contacts page.