Introduction
Modern agriculture
has developed large-scale, intensive production systems, including those for livestock. At
the same time, society has shown increased interest in how its food is produced and how
animals are cared for. This includes the practice of rearing animals in confined spaces.
Background
In the latter part of the twentieth century, animal
agriculture underwent a major transition to intensive livestock operations. These
operations are more economically viable and provide food at a lower cost to the consumer.
Efficient livestock operations now enable each farmer to feed many more people than in the
past.
Many livestock operations achieve efficiency by raising
large numbers of animals in smaller spaces. While providing for most of the animals
needs, some of these confinement production systems restrict their movement. They may also
limit the ability of animals to exhibit some normal behaviours.
| The Canadian Agri-Food Research Council developed the
Recommended Codes of Practices for the Care and Handling of Livestock. The Codes are based
on technical input from producers, animal scientists, veterinarians, and representatives
of the humane movement. These Codes are part of the regulations in The Animal Care Act of
Manitoba. As such, they specify the guidelines for livestock production pertaining to the
treatment of animals. The Act also outlines the "Duties of the Owner" regarding
responsible animal care. Producers who fail to comply with the Act may be subject to
prosecution in Manitoba. |
Duties of
the Owner under The Animal Care Act of Manitoba
- Provision of adequate water and feed
- Provision of adequate medical attention.
- Protection from heat and cold.
- Provision of adequate space, ventilation, and sanitation.
- Opportunity for exercise.
|
Examples of Confinement Systems
Sow Stalls
Modern pig barns provide for most aspects of pig care.
These include feed, water, medical attention and clean, dry housing with temperature,
ventilation and humidity controls.
Most pigs are raised in group housing units where they
have freedom of movement.

However, pregnant sows are commonly housed in individual
gestation stalls. They were developed to eliminate biting, bullying and competition for
feed among sows. In stalls, sows have ready access to feed and water, individual medical
treatment and protection from other sows. As a result, they may be physically healthier,
and may produce more piglets than sows raised in alternate production systems. On the
other hand, sows confined to a space where movement is restricted, are unable to exhibit
some natural behaviours such as rooting, nesting, and wallowing. Also, the lack of
exercise may negatively affect a sows welfare.
Group housing systems are continually evolving to
provide alternatives to individual gestation stalls. This type of housing requires a
thorough understanding of sow behaviour in establishing pen design and feeding systems.
Extra staff training and more attention to worker safety is needed.
The farrowing crate is a modified stall system for use
when the sow is about to give birth, and until the piglets are weaned. Although it
restricts the sows movement, use of the farrowing crate is short-term and protects
the piglets from being crushed by the sow. Alternate designs are continuously being
studied.
The Battery Cage for Egg-Laying Chickens
The battery cage system consists of rows of cages for
egg-laying chickens. Under this system, hens are grouped in cages so that the eggs can be
easily collected. The hens are clean, well nourished, and the eggs produced are also clean, resulting in a safer food product for the consumer. This system makes
the operation more efficient because of reduced labour requirements. However, the battery
cage system reduces the hens ability to express natural behaviours such as perching,
nesting, and dust bathing.
As a partial solution, space allowances could be
increased for chickens in such systems. Alternative housing such as the modified cage with
a nest box and perch, or the open barn system using floor litter, perches, and nest boxes,
are available. However, these systems have greater labour requirements.
The Beef Cattle Feedlot
Most cattle raised for
beef spend 4 to 8 months prior to slaughter in a confined area called a feedlot. Feedlots
are generally a series of outdoor pens constructed with shelter from
wind. They are designed to provide adequate space for feeding and
watering, appropriate bedding material and proper drainage. Animals
in feedlots cannot graze, however, they are able to exercise.
Dairy Cow Housing
Modern dairy operations provide feed,
water and medical attention. The barns are clean and dry with
temperature, ventilation and humidity controls.
There are two main types of housing
for dairy cows during the months when they are producing milk - the
free-stall dairy barn and the tie stall system.
In free stall barns, the cows are
able to move freely throughout the barn and have access to
comfortable stalls to lie down.
They may also have access to
outdoor pens in the summer but usually not to pasture.
In tie stall barns, milking cows
stand in individual stalls and are tied by a neck chain. Movement
about the barn is restricted. Producers may use a regular schedule
to allow the cows to get exercise outdoors, as the weather permits.
During the period of time when the cows are not
producing milk, they are kept in groups either indoors, outside or on pasture depending on
the season.
The Veal Calf Stall
The veal calf stall is a confinement system for raising
some dairy calves. The calf is raised in a controlled environment where it is fed a highly
specialized diet to produce veal. Movement is restricted and the calves are unable to
exhibit some normal behaviour.
Alternate group housing systems for veal calves are
available, and are being utilized by some producers. However, hands-on management to
reduce disease and to produce high quality veal products is more difficult in the group
system.
The Pregnant Mare Urine (PMU) Stall
Horses in the PMU industry are kept on pasture from
spring until late fall. During the winter, pregnant mares are kept in tie stalls to allow
for the collection of estrogen-rich urine. The mare urinates into a rubber collection
system that is attached to the stall.

Collection systems have been improved to allow more
movement. Mares are allowed free access to water, have balanced nutrition programs and the
opportunity for regular exercise. A veterinarian inspects the mares three times during the
collection season to ensure that they are healthy.
Research into alternative systems for urine collection
is ongoing. To date, no suitable alternative to the PMU stall has been identified.
What Does the Future Hold?
The Codes of Practice are in a state of revision and
review. What is an acceptable practice today may well be judged to be unsatisfactory
tomorrow. Changes to the Codes will become part of the legal framework of The Animal Care
Act in Manitoba. Producers must conduct their operations in accordance with the Act.
The trend towards production systems that provide more
opportunity for exercise is being pushed along more rapidly by consumer demand. Some
consumers have demonstrated a desire to purchase eggs, meat and milk produced in such
systems and are willing to pay a premium.
The push by many large food retailers to market
animal-welfare friendly foods, has created a significant momentum for change in how
animals are raised. Many food retailers have established animal welfare advisory boards
that specify production practices.
Jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom and the
European Union are moving to ban some livestock confinement systems. The veal calf stall
is no longer used in the U.K., the battery cage has been banned in Switzerland, and the
gestation stall will be banned shortly in the U.K. and E.U. Livestock producers and
government regulators in Manitoba and Canada would prefer to avoid legislative bans,
instead using codes of practice and societal pressure to induce change.
Summary
Intensive livestock production systems were developed to
enhance productivity and efficiency. These systems have allowed producers to reduce
disease, and to produce safe, wholesome meat, milk, and eggs at a lower cost to the
producer and consumer.
The public is becoming more interested in how food is
produced and is expressing concerns about confinement. There are alternatives to current
confinement systems and research into new methods is ongoing.

|