|

|
July 31, 2006
|
|
|
Manitoba Insect and Disease Update
|
|
Compiled by:
John Gavloski, Entomologist, Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural
Initiatives, Phone: 204-745-5668; Fax: 204-745-5690; and
David Kaminski, Acting Plant Pathologist, Manitoba Agriculture, Food and
Rural Initiatives, Phone: 204-745-5656; Fax: 204-745-5690.
To report observations of insect and disease activity or control
that may be of interest or importance to others in Manitoba, please
send messages to the above contact addresses.
To be placed on an e-mail list to be notified when new Manitoba
Insect and Disease Updates are posted, please contact
John Gavloski at
the address or numbers listed above.
|
Sunflowers
Insect Concerns on Confection vs.
Oilseed Sunflowers
Last week's update discussed controlling
insects on sunflower heads. It should be noted that the
economics of the seed-feeding insects differs greatly
depending on whether it is confection or oilseed
sunflowers that are grown. Lygus bugs are a concern on
confection sunflowers and the threshold that has been
developed (about one lygus bug per nine heads) is for
confection sunflowers only. Lygus bug damage is a
quality issue in sunflowers, but the effect on yield is
not likely great. So lygus bugs would not be an
economical concern in oilseed sunflowers. Both seed
weevils and banded sunflower moth can decrease yield as
well as affect quality, but the quality loss is the
biggest concern. So thresholds will be much lower for
confection sunflowers than oilseed sunflowers. For
sunflower seed weevil the economic threshold is one to
two weevils per plant in confection sunflowers and 12 to
14 weevils per head in oilseed sunflowers. However,
sunflower seed weevil numbers are very low this year,
and it is doubtful that numbers will be above threshold
in any sunflower fields in Manitoba, whereas lygus bug
numbers have been high in many fields, and insecticide
applications for control of lygus bugs continue in
confection sunflowers.
|
|

|
Sunflower Wilt As the
cool-season crops are rapidly maturing, attention shifts
to the warm-season crops that still have a ways to go to
mature. Over the last two weeks our summer students have
visited a number of fields of sunflowers, some of which
have noticeable levels of wilt caused by Sclerotinia and
otherwise known as basal stalk rot. A field near Oak
Bluff had 2% of the plant infested and another west of
Carey had 8% of stems affected. |
 |
|
These infections are reflective of the concentration
of resting bodies in the soil and are related to past white
mold incidence in the preceding crops. This type of
infection does not depend on wet soil – in fact, no
spores are involved in the infection process. The
probability of spread is minimal although plants that
are in close proximity to infected stems may also
succumb before the end of the season. Dry as it has
been, we have also been amazed to see some trace
incidence of head rot. Because such
infections can only occur from ascospores, there must be
some apothecia lurking somewhere, either under irrigated
crops or in fields that have cashed in on the
thunderstorm lottery.
|
 |
Soybeans
Soybean Aphids - Economic Threshold vs.
Economic Injury Level
Because of the potentially quick rate
of increase in aphid numbers, in many crops the economic thresholds for aphids
(the point where control is recommended to prevent economic
injury) is often lower than the
economic injury level (the level of aphids that can cause enough
injury to equal the costs of controlling them). The economic
injury level for aphids on soybeans is actually about 1,000
aphids per plant on average. If natural enemies are not present
at levels high enough to provide good regulation of aphid
numbers, aphid numbers can increase quite rapidly. Since there
is often some lag time between when a field is scouted and when
an insecticide can be applied, economic thresholds are often set
lower than the economic injury level so aphid numbers do not
have time to go above the economic injury level before an
insecticide is applied. In soybeans, the economic threshold for
soybean aphid has been set at 250 aphids per plant and the
population is increasing. The reason “and the population
is increasing” has been included in the economic
threshold is because 250 is not the damaging level of aphids, but means the
field is in danger of reaching damaging levels and needs to be
watched carefully. If natural enemy populations progress to the
point where they are able to keep the soybean aphids at or under
250 aphids per plant, than the net loss to the farmer is greater
from purchasing and applying the insecticide than the damage
aphids would have caused. So when scouting for soybean aphids,
keep track of whether the population seem to be growing, or are
stabilizing below a level where control would be economical. Our IPM assistants for the summer have been informing me that
predator populations are quite high in some of the soybean
fields they have been in recently.
Canola
Bertha Armyworm
Control of bertha armyworm continues on canola
in the Northwest. Some considerations when deciding on whether
control is practical or even possible for bertha armyworm
include the following.
Economic Threshold: A loss of 0.058 Bu/acre for each larva/m2 can be expected.
Multiplying 0.058 X average number of larvae/m2 X
expected seed value (dollars/acre) will determine the economic
loss (in dollars/acre) due to the larvae. If we are optimistic
and assume a grower will get $7.00 per bushel for their canola,
and can control bertha armyworm for $10 per acre, the economic
threshold would be 25 larvae/m2.
If we assume a control cost of $12 per acre and that
the grower anticipates $6 per bushel for the canola, the
economic threshold would be 34/m2. See Table 1
on the Bertha
Armyworm Factsheet webpage (MAFRI) for a
set of calculated thresholds for various spraying costs and
values of canola.
Preharvest Interval: Preharvest interval
is the number of days that must pass between the last
application of an insecticide and the cutting of the crop. The
following is a list of the insecticides registered for control
of bertha armyworm in canola and their preharvest intervals:
|
Insecticide |
Preharvest Interval |
| Decis |
7 |
| Matador |
7 |
| Ripcord |
30 |
| Lannate |
8 |
| Lorsban / Pyrinex / Nufos / Chlorpyrifos |
21 |
| Monitor |
10 |
The shortest preharvest interval is seven days. So make sure canola
is scouted and control decisions made in time to meet these preharvest intervals. If an infestation is discovered within a week
of swathing, insecticides can not be applied (unless swathing is
delayed). There are serious marketing and trade consequences should
unacceptable pesticide residues be detected in crops, so growers and
agronomists are encouraged to be aware of and follow preharvest
intervals.
When to Apply an Insecticide: Many of the bertha armyworm
larvae will be hiding under debris on the ground during the day, and
come up to feed in the evening. If bertha armyworm are above the
economic threshold, and pod feeding is beginning, and there is more
than a week until swathing, the ideal time to be spraying would be
as late in the day as possible, or early morning.
White Butterflies on Your Crops?
Some have been calling regarding what all the white butterflies
are that are quite numerous in some of the fields. These are cabbage
butterflies. They are not pests of any field crops, but will often
be present in fields, often in big numbers, as they look for nectar.
The larvae (referred to as imported cabbageworms) may occasionally
be found on canola leaves, but do not cause enough damage to be
considered economical pests of canola. They can be serious pests of
vegetable crops in the cabbage family, however.

Cabbage butterfly |

Imported cabbageworm
(larva of cabbage butterfly) |
Insects and Diseases in Vegetable Crops
Information on insects and diseases in vegetable crops in
Manitoba can be found in the
Manitoba Weekly Vegetable Report.
|
| |
|