Summary
Pea aphids and wheat midge have
reached economic threshold levels in some fields in the
southwest. High counts of bertha armyworm moths are
occurring in quite a few traps, suggesting a larger area
of the province could have problems with the larvae this
year than was the case last year.
Recent Insect Concerns and Observations
| Aphids in Peas
Pea aphids were above economic threshold in some
fields in the southwest and west of Winnipeg. Refer to
last weeks update for information on economic thresholds
and scouting tips.
A reminder that the flowering stage is a good time to
be sampling for aphids in peas, because most of the
damage that aphids do to peas is to the pods before they
start to fill. If aphid populations are greater then the
economic threshold, the best timing for control is when
about 50% of plants have produced some young pods.
|
 |
Timing of Bertha Armyworm Control
Twice last week I had calls from northwest Manitoba
regarding farmers wanting to tank mix in an insecticide
with their fungicide for sclerotinia management to try
to kill adult moths of bertha armyworm so they wouldn’t
have to control the larvae later. The rationale was that
an application to the field was already being made, and
the insecticide was cheap, so it can’t hurt to try this,
right?
Actually it can do a lot more harm than good trying
to manage insect populations that are below economic
threshold. And in this case it is also strongly not advised
because the application is trying to target a stage
where there is no data to show that the application can
repeatedly result in a significant reduction in damage;
my gut feeling is that any control achieved would be
spotty and not repeatable. And, if there is a high
population of adult moths in the area, odds are there
are already some eggs that have been laid on the plants
which will not be killed by the insecticide. So spraying
for larvae may be necessary later anyway.
Ultimately, one of the factors that has a large role
in ending an outbreak cycle of bertha armyworm is
natural enemies. There is a hairy fly, known as a tachinid fly, and a large orange ichneuminid wasp that
over the long term can be very effective at reducing
bertha armyworm populations. Spraying insecticides when
we are not targeting an economic population, can cause
harm because it kills these parasites.
Even if the insecticide were free, it would not be
advised to be spraying to try to see what kill of adult
bertha armyworm moths could be achieved.
Agronomists who are aware of this practice occurring
in there region; please try to get this information out.
Wheat Midge
There has been some insecticide applied to wheat in
the Hamiota area to control wheat midge.
A lot of wheat is advancing quite quickly. When wheat
flowers (this is when you see the yellow anthers on the
heads) there are chemical changes that occur that make
the wheat naturally resistant to wheat midge. Thus
insecticides targeting wheat midge should not be applied
to fields that are already flowering. This can do more
harm than good since not only is the wheat no longer
susceptible to wheat midge, but you will also be killing
the parasites of wheat midge and other natural enemies
of potential pests in the field. The critical stages to
scout for wheat midge, and apply controls if economic
thresholds are surpassed, is from as soon as heads are
visible until about 75% of the heads have anthers.
A factsheet with more detailed information on wheat
midge is available on the MAFRI website at:
Wheat Stem Maggots
White heads of wheat are noticeable in some fields that should otherwise
still have green heads. One
possible cause of this is wheat stem maggot. There are
diseases and environmental factors that can also cause
white heads in wheat, so if is not always immediately
obvious what the cause is. If wheat stem maggot is the
cause, most of the heads will easily slide out of the
stem when you pull on them. And if you slit the stems
you may be able to see the pale green maggots inside.
They also tend to leave frass in the stem that looks
like sawdust. In some of the fields around Carman the
white heads are quite noticeable, and they have also
been reported to be quite noticeable in the Treherne/Holland, Neepawa,
and many fields in southwest Manitoba areas.
This is another example of something that can be very
noticeable, because of the way the white heads stand
out, but is rarely of economic significance. If even 1
in a few hundred plants have a white head, it often
looks bad to some when scouting the field because the
white heads are so noticeable everywhere you look. But
the reality is that this will have very little impact on
overall yield. And there are no insecticides registered
for wheat stem maggot anyway. So it is worth checking
out what is the cause of the white heads, but for wheat
stem maggot it is not something to get too alarmed over.
There are crop production practices that can help
minimize future populations of wheat stem maggot. These
may need to be considered if growers or agronomists are
concerned over the levels seen in fields. More
information on wheat stem maggot can be found on the
MAFRI website at:
Surveys and Forecasts
Bertha Armyworm Trap Results: Results from
monitoring adults of bertha armyworm continue to climb.
A trap near Bradwardine has now collected over 1200
moths, so this region of the southwest is at high risk,
and a trap near Swan Lake is now at 1162. There are
several traps in the 500–1000 range.
As mentioned in earlier updates, the early indication
is that potentially economical populations could be
found a lot further east in the province than last year.
This data should be used as a guide to help prioritize
field scouting for the larvae. In many areas of the
province it will be critical that canola fields are
scouted frequently from about mid-July to mid-August to
know what the bertha armyworm levels are.
Also note that populations of larvae can vary greatly
between fields that are close together. Crop staging at
the time of egg laying is one of the factors that can
influence this. So it is important to check all fields
and not make assumptions based on levels in nearby
fields.
Trap data, a risk map, as well as a table indicating
how to interpret the trap data can be found at:
|