|
Background and Objectives:
There were 180,000 acres of field beans produced in Manitoba in 1999, which is more
than double the acreage in 1998. Based on monitoring by Manitoba Agriculture and Food,
losses from white mould in the past five years have been close to ten percent. The cost of
this yield loss is over four million dollars that could be returned from the use of an
accurate application of fungicide. As field bean acreage continues to expand, disease
incidence will increase due to shortened crop rotations. Integrated pest management of
white mould is a key issue that needs to be investigated.
This study is part of an ongoing initiative that began in 1995. Fungicide trials
conducted in 1998 indicated a difference in disease severity between irrigated and dryland
trials. Environmental factors such as soil moisture, relative humidity, precipitation and
temperature strongly influence the occurrence and spread of diseases. This project will
determine the optimum efficacy and timing of fungicide applications in consideration of
environmental factors. Comparisons will again be made between irrigated and dryland
replicated plots, with the goal of establishing a white mould disease risk program for
both types of management used in field bean production. This is a continuation of ARDI
project number 99.254, which provided useful data in 1999 for the development of a white
mould predictive model for beans. The risk prediction model will be compared to a model
developed for sclerotinia of canola and modification will be made that will enable the
bean model to be incorporated into Adcon software.
Procedure and Project Activities:
In 2000, three field sites were established with two at the Manitoba Crop
Diversification Centre located at Carberry, Manitoba and one at Portage la Prairie. One
field at Carberry and one field at Portage la Prairie were irrigated and the remaining
field at Carberry received natural precipitation only. The fungicides used in this study
were Benlate, Ronilan and Senator.
Weather conditions prior to fungicide application were ideal for development of white
mould. Apothecia were observed in the area of all field sites. The application of
fungicides to the plots at Carberry was done on July 20 with split applications applied on July 20 and July 30,
2000. The Portage plots were sprayed with fungicides on July 21 with split applications
applied on July 21 and 31, 2000. Disease evaluation was based on the observation of 100
plants per plot. Disease severity was rated using an assessment scale of 0-4 where the
percent surface area covered by lesions was equivalent to none (0), 1-25% (1), 26-50% (2),
51-75% (3) and 76-100%. The Carberry and Portage trials were rated for incidence of white
mould on August 25 and August 22, respectively.
Soil Moisture was measured by means of a watermark type soil moisture probe. The probe
measures soil moisture in kPa of pressure on a scale of 0 to 512 kPa. A value of 0 is
taken as soil moisture saturation and a value of 512 is below the permanent wilting point.
There were two moisture probes at each site (Soil Moisture White and Soil Moisture
Yellow).
Results and Discussion:
Disease development was the result of infection by ascospores produced from sclerotia
buried within the plots and may have involved natural inoculum as apothecia were observed
in the area of all sites. Within sites, apothecia were first observed at the Carberry
irrigated site on August 4. No apothecia were observed at this time within the dryland
site. The incidence of white mould at the irrigated site (Carberry) ranged from 65.6 % (no
fungicide application) to 22.8 % (Benlate - single application). At the Carberry dryland
site, white mould incidence was less and ranged between 31.6 % (no fungicide application)
and 12.7 % (Ronilan - single application). Similarly, at the Portage site, disease
incidence ranged from 13.9 % (no fungicide application) to 0.2% (Ronilan - single
application). Although disease levels at the dryland site in Carberry were higher than the
irrigated site at Portage, it is likely that additional rainfall received at the Carberry
site allowed soil to periodically remain moist enough to favour the germination of
sclerotia and production of ascospores.
At all three sites, application of Benlate,
Ronilan or Senator as single or split applications resulted in less disease than in the
plots where no fungicides were applied. In the 1999 trial, the lowest disease incidences
were observed with the split applications of Benlate. In 2000 at the Portage site, disease
incidence with the Benlate split application was low (0.7%), but did not differ
significantly from any other single or split applications. Benlate applied as a single
application produced a low level of disease at the irrigated Carberry site (22.8%)
compared to the plots with no fungicide application(s). However, the Benlate single
application did not differ significantly from the split application at this site.
Disease levels at the dryland site were lower than those at the irrigated sites.
Weather conditions prior to flowering were conducive to the development of the disease,
but periods of dry weather lowered the risk of white mould at the dryland site.
Environmental conditions at the dryland site (Figure 2) were not as conducive to
disease development as at the irrigated site at Carberry (Figure 1). Moist soil conditions
as a result of irrigation and a higher relative humidity provided conditions ideal for the
development of white mould. Sclerotia require a period of ten days to two weeks of moist
soil conditions before they germinate to produce apothecia. A more even distribution of
moisture to provide longer periods of moist soil at the irrigated site was conducive to
germination of higher numbers of sclerotia to produce apothecia and ultimately release
ascospores.
Differences in levels of white mould between fungicide treatments are evident (Table 1)
and these are reflected in the yield data (Table 2). At Carberry, the lowest yields were
predominate in plots that were not treated with fungicides and this corresponded to
greater disease incidences than in plots where fungicides were applied. Of the two
Carberry sites, lowest yields were evident at the dryland site. Yields at the irrigated
site ranged from 2627 kg/ha (no fungicide application) to 3556 kg/ha (Benlate - single
application). At the Carberry dryland site, yields ranged between 2403 kg/ha (no fungicide
application) and 3039 kg/ha (Senator - single application). Similar results occurred in
the Carberry irrigated and dryland plots in 1999. Yields at the irrigated Portage site
were less than those at the both the irrigated and dryland Carberry sites.
Development on Sclerotinia Risk Program
The 2000 research results indicated that the most important variable in the development
of a sclerotinia forecast model is soil moisture prior to and during the flowering period.
This was also the conclusion of (Bom and Boland 2000) in the Canadian Journal of Plant
Science.
Apothecia development occurred in the irrigated Carberry site (Figure 1) on about
August 4, following a period of 14 days of high soil moisture. Apothecia were not observed
in the non irrigated Carberry site where the soil moisture was very low from July 22 to
August 10. Extended periods of high soil moisture were found to be favourable for the
development of Sclerotinia white mould as evident by the much higher infection levels in
the irrigated versus the nonirrigated site at Carberry. Precipitation, relative humidity
and temperature measurements were also recorded, but were not directly utilized in the
forecast model development. Further field evaluation is required to validate the forecast
model in commercial fields. The model needs to be programmed into Adcon software as the
next step in this model development.
Table 1.
Effect of Benlate, Ronilan and Senator (single and split
applications) on incidence of white mould of bean under irrigated (Carberry
and Portage la Prairie) and dryland conditions (Carberry) in 2000.
|
Treatment |
Rate
(kg/acre) |
Disease Incidence (%)1 |
|
Irrigated-P |
Dryland-C |
Irrigated-C |
|
Untreated A2 |
- |
13.9 a3 |
31.6 a |
65.6 a |
|
Untreated B2 |
- |
11.2 ab |
28.4 a |
60.1 a |
|
Benlate – single |
0.91 |
1.1 c |
14.1 b |
22.8 b |
|
Ronilan - single |
0.60 |
0.2 c |
12.7 b |
55.5 a |
|
Senator - single |
0.90 |
1.4 c |
14.3 b |
45.3 ab |
|
Benlate - split |
0.45/0.45 |
0.7 c |
31.2 a |
48.5 ab |
|
Ronilan – split |
0.40/0.40 |
0.6 c |
15.1 b |
40.7 ab |
|
Senator – split |
0.45/0.45 |
3.4 bc |
20.5 ab |
49.8 ab |
1
Sclerotia were buried in all plots with the exception of the untreated A
plots; data represents the
mean disease incidence
from 100 plants per plot (Carberry and Portage sites).
2
Represent plots where no
fungicides were applied.
3
Means within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly
different at the 0.05 level
(Fisher’s least
significant difference test).
Table 2.
Effect of
Benlate, Ronilan and Senator (single and split applications) on the
yield of bean under irrigated (Carberry and Portage la Prairie, 2000)
and dryland conditions (Carberry).
|
Treatment |
Rate
(kg/acre) |
Yield (kg/ha)1 |
|
Irrigated-C |
Dryland-C |
Irrigated-P |
|
Untreated A2 |
- |
2627
c3 |
2636 bc |
1888 ab |
|
Untreated B2 |
- |
2835 bc |
2403 c |
1939 ab |
|
Benlate – single |
0.91 |
3556 a |
2656 bc |
2037 ab |
|
Ronilan - single |
0.60 |
3232 ab |
2816 ab |
1760 ab |
|
Senator - single |
0.90 |
3223 ab |
3039 a |
1846 ab |
|
Benlate - split |
0.45/0.45 |
3189 ab |
2732 abc |
2078 a |
|
Ronilan – split |
0.40/0.40 |
2948 bc |
2616 bc |
1442 b |
|
Senator – split |
0.45/0.45 |
3058 abc |
2896 ab |
1920 ab |
1
Sclerotia were buried in all plots with the exception of the untreated A
plots; data represents the
mean yield.
2
Represent plots where no
fungicides were applied.
3
Means within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly
different at the 0.05 level
(Fisher’s least
significant difference test).
Disease development was the result of infection by ascospores produced from sclerotia
buried within the plots and may have involved natural inoculum as apothecia were observed
in the area of all sites. Disease levels at the dryland site were lower than those at the
irrigated sites. Weather conditions prior to flowering were conducive to the development
of the disease, but periods of dry weather lowered the risk of white mould at the dryland
site. Differences in levels of white mould between fungicide treatments were evident and
these were reflected in the yield data.
The 2000 research results indicated that the most important variable in the development
of a sclerotinia forecast model is soil moisture prior to and during the flowering period.
Further field evaluation is required to validate the forecast model in commercial
fields. The model needs to be programmed into Adcon software as the next step in this
model development.
Acknowledgments:
This project is funded by the Manitoba Pulse Growers Association, the Agriculture and
Agri-Food Canada - Matching Investment Initiative Program and the Agri-Food Research &
Development Initiative (ARDI). We would also like to acknowledge the support of the
Manitoba Crop Diversification Centre in providing field sites for this research. Technical
field assistance was provided by Tom Henderson, Shane Maguire and Joseph Fanai.
References:
Bom, M. and Boland, G.L. 2000. Evaluation of disease forecasting variables for
sclerotinia stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) of canola. Can. J. Plant Science 80:
889-898
|