Globe of the world that highlights Manitoba Waterfall Government of Manitoba logo, Manitoba with bison
Bottom part of globe high lighting ManitobaMAFRI Home PageWelcomeContact UsSite MapWhat's New? Search Français

Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives

PROJECT RESULTS

 

Novel Methods for Managing Fusarium Head Blight (FHB)-Infested Wheat Seed

 

back button

Applicant: 

Dr. Jeannie Gilbert

Cereal Research Centre

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

Winnipeg, Manitoba  R3T 2M9  Canada

 

Table of Contents:

 

 

ARDI Project:

 

#01-491

Total Approved:

$19,500

Date Approved:

January 31, 2003

Project Status:

Completed March, 2004

 

Background and Objectives:

The progress in registering fusarium head blight (FHB)-resistant wheat has been slow and measures for disease management have assumed an important role.  Among these, reduced survival, or eradication of the fungus from infested seed, and improved agronomic performance, have become important issues in light of recent measures to restrict movement of infested seed into western Saskatchewan and Alberta.  Several novel methods have been, and continue to be, tested to identify economical ways to control seed-borne FHB.

Procedure and Project Activities:

  • Seed was treated with 9 different heat treatments ranging from 30°C to 90°C for 5 days.

  • Seed was treated with two concentrations of acetic acid.

  • Gustafson treated infested seed with 3 Raxil products: Raxil, Raxil + Thiram, and Raxil  JAU.

Germination and levels of F. graminearum were assessed before and after treatment.  Plots, 7 rows wide and 6 m in length, were seeded in a complete randomized block design with 4 replicates at Glenlea, Manitoba on May 29, 2003.  Assessments included emergence at 2 weeks on June 13, 2003.  Heading, height, and maturity were taken during July and August.  After harvest on August 27, yield, thousand kernel weight (TKW), and hectoliter weight were measured.

Results and Discussion:

Heat Treatments

Field emergence was very low after heat treatment at 90°C and the analysis was therefore restricted to the other treatments.  In 2003, anomalous results with two treatments suggest that there was a mechanical error with the ovens (Table 1).  The extremely low field emergence indicated a problem with treatments of Fusarium seed for 10 and 12 days at 70° C (Table 1), and resulted in significant differences for all variables in all treatments (Table 2).  When treatments for 10 and 12 days at 70° C were removed from the analysis, mean squares for emergence were the only values showing significant differences among treatments (Table 3).  These results were similar to those obtained in the first year of tests in 2002.

Table 1.  Effects of Heat Treatments on Emergence, Yield, Thousand Kernel Weight (TKW), Hectolitre Weight, and Height of Fusarium-Free and Fusarium-Infested Seed of Glenlea Wheat - 2003. 

Fusarium-Free

Emergence/m Row

Yield

TKW

Hectolitre Weight (g)

Height (cm)

Control

38.5 a y

3260 a

33.3 a

78.0 a 

97.8 a

30  C - 5D

40.5 a

3020 a

32.2 ab

77.8 a

97.5 a

50  C - 5D

39.7 a

2920 a

32.7 a

77.7 a

97.4 a

70  C - 5D

40.0 a

3070 a

32.4 ab

78.0 a

96.8 a

70  C - 10D

7.8 c

1380 b

30.1 c

76.6 b

90.5 b

70  C - 12D

10.5 c

1580 b

30.9 bc

77.1 b

90.3 b

70  C - 10D+preheat z

32.7 b

2920 a

32.6 a

78.0 a

95.6 a

70  C - 12D+preheat

37.1 a

3080 a

32.8 a

78.1 a

97.8 a

Fusarium-Infested

 

 

 

 

 

Control

31.0 bc

2800 ab

32.4

78.1

96.3

30  C - 5D

32.3 abc

2700 ab

32.3

77.8

94.8

50  C - 5D

33.2 abc

2660 ab

32.2

77.8

95.1

70  C - 5D

31.0 bc

2950 a

32.4

78.1

95.6

70  C - 10D

33.6 abc

2730 ab

32.3

77.6

94.8

70  C - 12D

35.7 a

2700 ab

32.4

78.1

96.6

70  C - 10D+preheat

34.7 ab

2540 b

31.9

78.1

96.5

70  C - 12D+preheat

30.2 c

2840 ab

32.3

78.0

94.3

Z Seed treated at 38° C for 2 days before treatment.

y Values in columns followed by the same, or no letter, are not significantly different at P  0.05.

 

Table 2.  Mean Squares from Analysis of Variance from Full Data Set in 2003.

Fusarium-Free Seed 2003

Source

Df

Emergence

Yield

TKW z

Hectolitre Weight

Height

Block

3

53.8

0.378

2.4

0.6

32.1

Heat treatment

7

744.9**

2.164**

4.6**

1.2**

41.0**

Error

21

7.3

0.055

1.1

0.2

4.7

Fusarium-Infested Seed 2003

Block

3

0.8

0.172

0.7

0.3

25.1

Heat treatment

7

15.2

0.061

0.1

0.1

3.1

Error

21

7.5

0.073

0.3

0.3

3.2

** P # 0.0001, z Thousand kernel weight.

 

Table 3.  Mean Squares from Analysis of Variance in 2003 Excluding Treatments for 10 and 12 Days at 70° C. 

Fusarium-Free Seed 2003

Source

Df

Emergence

Yield

TKWz

Hectolitre Weight

Height

Block

3

45.4

0.254

2.3

0.4

15.7

Heat treatment

5

33.7**

0.063

0.5

0.1

2.7

Error

15

5.9

0.034

0.7

0.1

3.5

Fusarium-Infested Seed 2003

Block

3

1.9

0.082

0.4

0.1

22.0

Heat treatment

5

11.5

0.084

0.1

0.1

2.9

Error

15

8.2

0.071

0.4

0.1

2.7

** P # 0.0001, z Thousand kernel weight.

 

Acetic Acid and Raxil-Based Fungicides

Treatment with acetic acid vapour at 0.8 ml resulted in poor germination and yield in both Fusarium-free and Fusarium-infested seed (Table 4).  When this treatment was removed from the analysis there were no significant differences among the remaining treatments.

Table 4.  Effects of Acetic Acid and Fungicide Treatments on Emergence, Yield, Thousand Kernel Weight (TKW), Hectolitre Weight, and Height of Fusarium-Free and Fusarium-Infested Seed of Glenlea Wheat - 2003. 

Fusarium-free

Emergence/m row

Yield kg/ha

TKW (g)

Hectolitre weight (g)*

Height (cm)

Acetic Acid

 

 

 

 

 

Control

39.8 a

2990 ab

33.2

78.1

99.3

0.4 ml

35.8 a

2590 ab

32.5

78

98.5

0.8ml

19.5 b

2490 b

32.5

77.4

93.4

Control

38.5 a

3260 a

33.3

78

97.8

Raxil

34.5 a

2920 ab

32.2

77.7

95.4

Raxil+Thiram

37.8 a

3020 ab

32.8

77.8

99.1

Raxil JAU

35.9 a

3270 a

33.5

77.9

97.6

Fusarium-infested

 

 

 

 

 

Acetic Acid

 

 

 

 

 

Control

33.9 a

2960 a

32.7

77.9

96.1

0.4 ml

33.3 a

2640 a

31.7

78

93.6

0.8ml

7.3 b

  970 b

31

77

90.1

Control

31.0 a

2800 a

32.4

78.1

96.3

Raxil

36.3 a

2620 a

32.7

77.9

97

Raxil+Thiram

37.1 a

2700 a

32.6

77.6

96

Raxil JAU

36.7 a

3040 a

32.9

78.1

94.9

Values followed by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey grouping at P#0.05.

 

Germination and Levels of Fusarium Graminearum Surviving Seed Treatments

Germination of treatments of Fusarium-free seed after 70°C for 10 and 12 days was poor, similar to field emergence, and again reflected a probable problem with the oven (Table 5).  There was also indication that there was contamination with seed treated at 70°C for 10 and 12 days with a pre-heat treatment of 2 days at 38°C as F. graminearum was found associated with both Fusarium-free and -infested  treated seed.  The experiment was repeated with remnant seed from the heat treatments (Experiment 2).  No F. graminearum survived the 70°C treatments.  The lower levels of F. graminearum on infected seed in Experiment 2 compared to Experiment 1 is likely because the seed after treatment had been exposed to room temperature for 4 months.  Under such conditions F. graminearum loses viability (Gilbert et al. 1997).

Acetic acid and fungicide treatments did not impair germination, except for acetic acid at a 0.8 ml concentration (Table 6).  However, only Raxil JAU eradicated the fungus from the seed.  The amount of seed available for these tests was small, and the experiments should be repeated to confirm the findings.

Table 5.  Effects of Heat Treatments on Germination of, and Survival of Fusarium graminearum (F.g.) in Fusarium-Free and Fusarium-Infested Seed of Glenlea Wheat - 2003. 

 

Experiment 1

Experiment 2

Fusarium-Free

Germination (%)

With F.g. surviving (%)

Germination (%)

With F.g. surviving (%)

Control

97.8 z

0

100 y

0

30  C - 5D

98

0

99 y

6

50  C - 5D

98.8

0

99 y

1

70  C - 5D

97.5

0

98 x

0

70  C - 10D

66

0

89 x

0

70  C - 12D