|
Background and Objective:
Distillers Dried Grain and
Solubles (DDGS) is a by-product
from the ethanol fermentation process that is sold to livestock
producers as feed. Contamination of the wheat or corn feedstock by the
Fusarium mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON) limits the use of DDGS for this
purpose.
Ionizing radiation such as that produced by
electron accelerators can destroy the Fusarium organism and has the
potential to eliminate DON. The objective of this work was to
investigate the effect of electron beam (EB) irradiation on DON
concentrations in samples taken from various stages in the ethanol
process where industrial-scale electron beam treatment can potentially
be incorporated.
Procedure and
Project Activities:
Five separate samples were collected from a
38.56 tonne lot of Canadian wheat containing 5.1 ppm DON processed at
the Husky Energy ethanol plant in Minnedosa, Manitoba. These samples
included the wheat used in the fermentation process; the mash or
stillage remaining after the ethanol was removed by distillation;
distillers solubles (a liquid fraction produced by centrifugation of the
stillage); wet distillers grain (the solid collected by centrifugation
of the stillage); and DDGS (produced after drying the recombined wet
distillers grain and distillers solubles).
Portions of each sample were
electron treated at Acsion’s facility in Pinawa to one of five doses in
the 2 - 55 kGy range. After irradiation, the samples containing liquid
(stillage, wet distillers grain, and distillers solubles) were freeze
dried. The 25 electron beam treated samples and the 5 untreated
controls were analyzed in duplicate for DON content by
gas-chromatography – mass spectrometry at the Canadian Grain
Commission’s Grain Research Laboratory.
Results and Discussion:
The
DON level in the wheat was 5.1 ppm. Much lower levels of
3-acetyl DON (0.09 ppm) and 15-acetyl DON (0.10 ppm) were also detected
in the unprocessed wheat. No other Fusarium trichothecene toxins were
detected in the unprocessed wheat or in the processed fractions. DON
levels in the untreated samples of stillage, wet distillers grain,
distillers solubles and DDGS were 4.3 ppm, 4.0 ppm, 4.9 ppm, and 2.0 ppm
respectively. The effects of EB treatment on
DON levels in the samples are shown in tables 1-5. This data was not
corrected for method recovery in the analyses, which varied from 85% to
106%.
Table
1. Effect of EB Treatment on DON Content of Wet Distillers Grain
|
Dose (kGy) |
Average DON Content (ppm) |
Std Dev |
|
0 |
4 |
0.14 |
|
2.9 |
4.65 |
0.07 |
|
5.1 |
4.1 |
0.57 |
|
10.6 |
3.3 |
0.42 |
|
21.2 |
3.4 |
0.00 |
|
51.4 |
2.05 |
0.35 |
Table
2. Effect of EB Treatment on DON Content of Distillers Solubles
|
Dose (kGy) |
Average DON Content (ppm) |
Std Dev |
|
0 |
4.9 |
0.28 |
|
2.6 |
4.6 |
0.42 |
|
5.4 |
4.3 |
0.42 |
|
10.6 |
3.75 |
0.49 |
|
21.4 |
3.05 |
0.21 |
|
55.8 |
1.15 |
0.07 |
Table
3. Effect of EB Treatment on DON Content of Whole Stillage
|
Dose (kGy) |
Average DON Content (ppm) |
Std Dev |
|
0 |
4.3 |
0.28 |
|
2.6 |
4.6 |
0.28 |
|
5.5 |
3.9 |
0.14 |
|
10.7 |
3.6 |
0.14 |
|
22.3 |
2.6 |
0.00 |
|
51.5 |
1.05 |
0.07 |
Table
4. Effect of EB Treatment on DON Content of Wheat Feedstock
|
Dose (kGy) |
Average DON Content (ppm) |
Std Dev |
|
0 |
5.10 |
0.14 |
|
2.7 |
4.70 |
0.14 |
|
5.3 |
4.65 |
0.07 |
|
11.1 |
4.70 |
0.00 |
|
21.7 |
4.55 |
0.07 |
|
54.4 |
4.25 |
0.07 |
Table
5. Effect of EB Treatment on DON Content of DDGS
|
Dose (kGy) |
Average DON Content (ppm) |
Std Dev |
|
0 |
2 |
0.14 |
|
2.6 |
2.1 |
0.14 |
|
5.3 |
2.1 |
0.14 |
|
10.6 |
2.05 |
0.21 |
|
21.4 |
2.2 |
0.00 |
|
51.8 |
2.1 |
0.14 |
DON levels in wet distillers
grain, distillers solubles, and whole stillage decreased with increasing
EB irradiation dose. At the highest doses used, EB treatment reduced
DON concentrations by 48.1% 75.5%, and 74.4% respectively relative to
the concentration in the untreated control samples.
EB treatment reduced DON
concentrations in the wheat by a maximum of 17.3% at the highest dose
used and had no affect on DON concentrations in DDGS. These results are
likely due to the lower water content in these samples compared to the
production intermediates. In the absence of significant moisture, the
interaction of radiation with the material would be through a direct
effect, while in an aqueous environment, radiation will convert water
into highly reactive free radicals which will attack and breakdown
organic molecules such as DON.
The DON level in DDGS was
approximately 59% lower than the concentration in the wheat. This is
typical for the process used at the Minnedosa plant and is assumed to be
due to the high temperatures used for flash drying of the product at the
front of the drying process. The combination of EB treatment with
drying could reduce the final DON levels in DDGS by 90% or more,
indicating that EB treatment may be a method for reducing DON levels in
DDGS on an industrial level.
Conclusions:
Electron beam treatment of DDGS
production intermediates can reduce DON levels up to 75%. Coupled with
the loss incurred in the drying step to produce DDGS, the total drop in
DON content could exceed 90%. These results
indicate that EB treatment may provide a method for reducing DON levels
in DDGS on an industrial scale.
Acknowledgements:
Acsion gratefully acknowledges the financial
assistance provided by the Governments of Manitoba and Canada through
the Canada-Manitoba Agri-Food Research and Development Initiative
(ARDI), without which this project would not have been possible.
Acsion thanks Husky Energy for supplying the samples
and the Canadian Grain Commission for analyzing the samples for DON
content.
|