|
Background and Objectives:
Hulless barley has recently become available as an alternative feed
source for use in livestock and poultry diets. While hulless barley is
gaining acceptance as a quality feedstuff for use in swine diets, there
is limited information available regarding its use in laying hen diets.
Dietary exogenous enzymes have been shown to be necessary for the
effective use of hulless barley in diets of growing poultry but there is
limited information available regarding the use of enzymes in laying hen
diets. The use of dietary enzymes could be more critical if the apparent
differential among varieties experienced with broilers is also a factor
for laying hens.
The major objective of this research was to demonstrate the efficacy
of hulless barley as a feedstuff in laying hen diets. Secondary
objectives were to determine if the productivity of laying hens fed
hulless barley could be enhanced by the use of exogenous enzymes and to
demonstrate that nitrogen and phosphorus pollution can be minimized
through the use of dietary enzymes to enhance productivity.
Procedure and Project Activities:
Four varieties of hulless barley (Falcon, Silky, Dawn and Gainer)
were each planted in 10 acre plots at the Glenlea Research Station in
May of 1998, 1999 and 2000. The harvested grain was utilized in the
following research trials. For the determination of True Metabolizable
Energy (TME) and True Digestible Amino Acid (TDAA) availability
determination a fifth variety (Bacon) was purchased to ensure that the
overall evaluation of hulless barley would encompass the potential
variability in the crop that may exist.
The TME and TDAA content of the hulless barley varieties were
determined using the adult rooster bioassay. The TDAA values were
determined for 16 of the amino acids present.
In the second phase of the research four hulless barley varieties
were used in three types of laying hen feeding trials. The first trial
was a 5-28 d period feeding trial with two strains of birds and five
dietary treatments: wheat control and Silky, Falcon, Gainer and Dawn
hulless barley diets formulated to meet the requirements of the birds.
Each diet was fed to 8 replicates of 16 hens per strains or 252 hens per
dietary treatment.
The second experiment was designed to determine if feeding hulless
barley based diets plus exogenous enzymes to laying hens will result in
equal performance compared to wheat diet control birds. 1280 SCWL hens
of the Shaver White strain at 26 wks of age were subdivided into
replicate groups of 4 adjacent cages (16 birds per replicate group).
Each group was randomly assigned to one of 10 dietary treatments (8
replicates per treatment). The dietary treatments were: wheat control,
and four hulless barley diets (Silky, Falcon, Gainer, Dawn). The diets
were fed with and without enzyme supplementation for 9-28 d periods.
The third laying hen trial was a 5-28 d period
feeding trial with two strains of hens equally distributed to each
dietary treatment. 576 hens (288 hens/strain) were equally divided into
36 replicates of 16 hens and each replicate was randomly assigned to one
of three dietary treatments (12 replicates or 192 hens per treatment).
The dietary treatments were as follows: a mixed barley (equal parts of
Gainer, Silky and Dawn) control diet without enzymes and two mixed
barley diets where the nutrients of the barley, canola and soybean meal
were uplifted by either 5% or 10% with an enzyme supplement added to the
diet. The uplift of the nutrients was based on the positive effect
observed in our second trial. Concurrent with this trial a nutrient
availability study was superimposed, to determine the enzyme affect on
nitrogen and phosphorus excretion and amino acid availability.
The production parameters collected daily in all three laying hen
trials were: egg production, feed consumption, initial and final body
weights, mortality as it occurred, egg weight over 3 consecutive days
for each period, observation of stained, cracked and shell-less eggs.
From the data also calculated were egg mass per day and feed efficiency
as g feed per g egg produced.
Results and Discussion:
On average the amino acid content of the five hulless barley
varieties expressed as a percent of protein varied less than 6% whereas
the true metabolizable energy variation was about 3%. The average true
digestibility of the amino acids was 78.5% with a low of 55% for lysine
and medium of 72% for methionine and 79% for threonine. These values are
of great significance for formulating diets on the basis of amino acid
availability. On average the hulless barley diets without enzymes
resulted in a slight reduction (1.5%) in hen-day production and a 2%
reduction in daily egg mass whereas other parameters were not affected.
Of interest is to note that there was a differential response to the
hulless barley diets by the two strains of birds, which might be worth
investigating further.
Supplementing hulless barley diets with a cocktail
of enzymes significantly improved performance of laying hens in general
but the magnitude of the response varied with the hulless barley
variety, with Silky and Falcon yielding the overall greatest response.
However the use of enzymes with all hulless barley varieties resulted
in performance equal to or better than the wheat control diet plus
enzymes. This suggests that the use of enzymes in hulless barley diets
removes the variability in response to different varieties. Similarly
based on the balance trial the amino acid availability was significantly
improved which may explain the improved performance. Contrary to common
belief that hulless barley diets when fed to laying hens increases the
incidence of soiled eggs, we did not experience this problem.
Uplifting the nutrient content of diets by 5 or 10%
when supplemental enzymes were fed reduced the feed intake by 7.5% but
maintained production at 88.6%, however egg size and egg mass were
slightly reduced (1.5%).More research is required to accurately
determine the uplift required to maintain all production parameters.
Although no change in excreta nitrogen content was observed the
phosphorus content was significantly decreased (15%) when enzymes were
fed with hulless barley diets.
Table 1. Performance of SCWL Hens Fed a Wheat Control Diet and Four
Hulless Barley Varieties With and Without Enzymes (9-28 d periods)
|
Performance Parameters |
Wheat Control1 |
Means of Hulless Barley Diets |
|
(-) |
(+) |
(-) |
(+) |
|
Hen
Day Production (%) |
84.8 |
84.0 |
83.1 |
84.4 |
|
Egg
Weight (g) |
56.9 |
57.4 |
57.2 |
57.8 |
|
Egg
Mass (g/h/d) |
47.6 |
47.8 |
47.1 |
48.7 |
|
Feed Intake (g/h/d) |
99.9 |
98.6 |
99.0 |
98.7 |
|
Feed Efficiency (g/g egg) |
2.10 |
2.09 |
2.15 |
2.08 |
1(-)
no enzyme added, (+) enzyme supplementation
Hulless barley when used in combination with exogenous enzymes can
effectively replace feed wheat in rations for laying hens.
The research results will be of direct benefit to grain producers as
laying hens represent a significant source of demand for cereals and
will be a good market for hulless barley. The feed industry should also
benefit in that they have an alternative grain source to use in laying
hen diets.
The reduction in phosphorus excretion will certainly be of benefit to
the environment.
Acknowledgments:
This project was made possible due to the funding from the
Governments of Manitoba and Canada through the Canada-Manitoba Agri-Food
Research and Development Initiative (ARDI). Matching funds were
received from the Manitoba Egg Producers, Canadian International Grains
Institute, the Alberta Barley Commission and the Western Grains Research
Foundation.
|