|
Background and Objective:
Adult cabbage root
maggots are similar to a house fly, but grayish and smaller. Female
flies lay eggs near the base of stems of canola. The eggs hatch into
legless, headless maggots that browse on the roots, producing
surface grooves and later tunnels in the root. Rotting of root
tissues frequently results. After repeated moulting and feeding, the
mature maggot swells into a brown barrel-like resting stage. It
over-winters in this stage and the following spring adult flies
emerge and search for mates.
The effect of root
maggots feeding on canola roots has not been fully quantified, but it
is clear that large numbers of maggots reduce yield, and can cause
plant death. Throughout the last four decades there has been a steady
increase in root maggots in prairie canola, and since the 1980s, there
has been occasional significant crop damage in Alberta. In
Saskatchewan and Manitoba economic damage has not been reported, but
the trend of increase has reached a point in Manitoba where the
prospect of economic loss is not distant.
No insecticides are
available to control root maggots in canola because the vulnerable
maggot stage occurs in mid-July. Insecticidal seed treatments that
would be active in July are too persistent to be used. We have been
doing research to find non-insecticidal control methods. These methods
include manipulations to production practices that can be implemented
now, and explorations of biological control that may provide a
permanent solution in the future. This project focuses on the
manipulation of production practices, and its objective was:
“To reduce injury
caused by cabbage maggot population in Manitoba through tillage and
other cultural practices.”
Procedure and Project Activities:
Large-scale field plot
trials were conducted for three years to test the effect of seeding
rate and tillage practice on the number of cabbage root maggots and
the amount of damage caused. Treatments consisted of a zero tillage
regime and a conventional tillage regime (fall and spring tillage)
and two seeding rates, 4 and 8 kg/ha. In each year, numbers of root
maggots and predators and root damage were assessed at weekly
intervals. Total quantity of yield and components of yield were also
assessed.
In field plots in 1999,
and in commercial fields from 2000 onwards, sampling was done to
examine the distribution of maggot larvae and root damage near the
edge of the canola crop. Root samples were taken at fixed intervals
from 0 to 20 m into the crop and also near the middle of the crop.
Roots were taken to the laboratory for damage rating and for
dissection to count maggot larvae.
Data was analyzed from a
large-scale survey of commercial canola fields being conducted by Dr.
J. Gavloski (Manitoba Agriculture and Food), and Dr. D. McLaren
(Brandon Research Station, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada) to
examine the effect of production practices on maggot damage in
commercial canola production. In each surveyed field, a total of 100
plants were taken as 20 plants from each of five widely separated
locations.
Results and Discussion:
Major
findings were:
-
Fields with short
rotation intervals invariably had higher levels of root damage.
-
Root damage was less
after zero tillage than after conventional tillage.
-
Root damage was lower
when higher seeding densities were used or plant density was higher.
-
Wind-breaks reduced the
number of larvae and root damage within 20 m of field margins.
-
Particularly in the
absence of wind-breaks, larval numbers and root damage were elevated
within 20 m of crop margins.
-
There was evidence of
yield loss when root damage ratings exceeded about 3 (25–50% of root
area damaged). These rating levels were exceeded in individual
plants in plots and near field margins throughout the study, and in
2000, five commercial fields had average damage rating over 3.0.
-
Quality characteristics
of yield, including oil content, gluosinolate concentration and
protein content appear to be related to root ratings when they are
above about 3.0.
Major
recommendations to reduce maggot damage are:
-
Short rotation
intervals between canola crops should be avoided.
-
Zero tillage practices
should be used to maintain crop residues on the soil surface
before
seeding canola, but
after
a
maggot-infested canola crop conventional tillage should be
practiced.
-
Higher seeding rates
should be used to promote higher plant densities.
-
Wind-breaks should be
established around canola fields.
Data on the
distribution of maggots near crop margins suggest that the following
practices be adopted:
-
Sampling to assess the
general levels of root maggots in canola fields should be done no
less than 20 m from the field margin.
-
If insecticidal methods
of root maggot control become available, consideration should be
given to applying insecticides only at the field margins.
-
Small plots, such as
those used by plant breeders, are particularly vulnerable to high
levels of root maggot attack, and can be protected by embedding them
within a larger stand of canola or another root maggot host, or by
surrounding them with fly-proof barriers > 1 m in height.
Root maggots are an
increasing pest to canola in the Canadian Prairies, are already of
economic significance in Alberta, and are expected to attain this
status in Manitoba within a few years. The absence of an effective
insecticidal control means that modification of production systems
is the only currently available tool for management. The research
resulted in recommendations for agronomic measures that, under
Manitoba conditions, will reduce the root damage associated with
root maggots, and so reduce the impact on canola yield. Until other
solutions, such as classical biological control or plant resistance,
are developed, agronomic methods are the best tactics available to
producers for avoidance of economic loss in the face of increasing
root maggot populations.
Acknowledgements:
This project was made
possible by funding from the Governments of Manitoba and Canada
through the Canada-Manitoba Agri-Food Research and Development
Initiative (ARDI) and by funding from the Canola Council of Canada
through the Canola Agronomic Research Program.
|