|
Background and Objectives:
Since 1995, canola (Brassica napus L.) has been the second most successful cash
crop in Canada. The 1999 growing season had a record area seeded of 5,598,700 hectares,
declining slightly to 4,894,600 hectares in 2000 (Statistics Canada 2001). Although canola
is an important contributor to the Canadian economy, little research has been conducted at
the field level to determine how crop phenological stage and ground cover respond to
weather variables such as temperature. The fungal infection Sclerotinia (Sclerotinia
sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary) is a serious disease of canola in western Canada. The
current model for predicting Sclerotinia disease for the Canadian Prairies predicts the
risk of infection based on crop stage and top-zone soil moisture estimates from a Canola
Phenology and Water-Use Model (Raddatz 1993, Raddatz et al. 1996). Crop stage and
fractional leaf area are estimated using accumulated growing degree-days above 5oC
and utilized in the estimation of top-zone soil moisture.
The accurate estimation of ground cover is an important component of determining
sclerotinia risk. The amount of canopy cover influences the relative humidity of the
environment of the disease organism. If there is little or no canopy cover, air near the
soil surface can mix with the air above, thereby lowering the relative humidity near the
soil surface, regardless of the surface soil moisture content. If there is complete ground
cover, air near the soil surface is prevented from mixing with the air above, and thus
relative humidity in the canopy is strongly influenced by surface soil moisture (Oke
1987). Thus, knowledge of the fractional leaf area is vital in accurately assessing
disease risk.
The overall aim of this project was to improve the current method for estimating the
risk of Sclerotinia infection on the Canadian Prairies. Presently, Sclerotinia risk is
based on soil moisture and growth stage information derived from a Canola Phenology and
Water-Use Model (Raddatz 1993). However, this model is limited because it uses a simple
heat unit to estimate phenological stage and percent ground cover. The accumulated growing
degree-days (GDD) above 5oC is a crude predictor of canola phenology because it
assumes a linear plant development-temperature relationship. The specific project
objectives were:
- Develop a heat unit specific for canola. A non-linear heat unit system such as the
P-Days system used to predict potato phenology will be adapted to reflect the cardinal
temperatures of canola and determine if this improves estimates of canola phenology.
- Determine the relationship between fractional leaf area and a heat unit developed
specifically for canola.
- Evaluate the accuracy of top-zone soil moisture estimated from the Canola Phenology and
Water-Use Model (Raddatz 1993; Raddatz et al. 1996).
Procedure and Project Activities:
Field Site Locations
Two varieties of canola (Brassica napus L. cv. Quantum and 2273) were seeded at
eight test sites within Agro-Manitoba (in collaboration with Aventis Canada) during the
1999 and 2000 growing season. The site locations were: 1) Brandon (1999), 2) Carman 1999,
3) Carman 2000, 4) Franklin 1999, 5) High Bluff, 6) Roblin 1999, 7) Roblin 2000 and 8)
Stonewall (1999). Although 12 sites were originally proposed as test locations,
difficulties with weather, seeding, and management reduced this number to 8.
Design
This project consisted of weekly field observations throughout the 1999 and 2000
growing season to determine the crop developmental stage, the fractional leaf area, and
top-zone soil moisture (10-cm depth). Daily maximum and minimum temperatures and
precipitation were obtained from the nearest Environment Canada Weather station.
Data Analysis
Fractional Leaf Area: The fractional leaf area was assessed using an innovative technique using an overhead
picture of the plot. This data was analysed using an image processing package called
ASSESS for Windows (formerly ImageX32 for Windows) (Lamari 2002).
Top-zone Soil Moisture:
Modelled top-zone soil moisture was compared to observed soil moisture values and was
further compared between sites that had on-site and off-site precipitation data.
Heat Units:
Heat units for each observed developmental stage were calculated using the maximum and
minimum daily temperatures from the nearest Environment Canada weather station.
Coefficients of variation were calculated for calendar days, growing degree-days above 5oC,
and several modified P-Day equations for both cultivars (Brassica napus L. cv. 2273
and Quantum). The modified P-days equation will be abbreviated using the following notation:
P-Days(base temperature, optimum temperature, maximum temperature).
Other Sources of Funding
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Scholarship for Janna Wilson
- Department of Soil Science: office space and laboratory facilities (in kind)
- Aventis Canada: seeded and maintenance of plots (in kind)
- Parkland Crop Diversification Centre in Roblin, MB: seeded and maintenance of plots in
Roblin (in kind)
- Summer Career Placement (Federal Government Student Employment Program)
Results and Discussion:
Heat Units
A paired t-test showed no significant difference between the two cultivars using
P-Days(5,17,30), except for the Brandon site. The Brandon site was eliminated
because the data from the site was unreliable. This was apparent early in the growing
season as it was seeded late (June 19, 2000) and had severe flea beetle damage, which
completely obscured emergence counts and caused abnormal phenological development.
Calendar days from planting were a better estimator of phenological development than
GDD above 5oC from planting, i.e. the coefficient of variation for GDD above 5oC
was greater for each stage of development and for the averaged coefficient of variation
(Table 1). Calculation from 50% emergence also lowered the average coefficient of
variation for all of the thermal time systems tested. The heat units which showed the
lowest coefficients of variation for the individual cultivars were recalculated for the
combined cultivar phenological development data. The P-Day(5,17 30) had the
lowest average coefficient of variation from planting for the critical stages 3.1 to 5.4.
Although there were other combinations that had lower average coefficients of variation
when calculated from 50% emergence, the lowest method from planting was chosen because it
would be more applicable to the Raddatz (1993) canola model. The following procedure
patterned after the P-Days(7,21,30) for potatoes (Sands et al. 1979) for
calculating the P-Days(5,17,30) is recommended:
P-days(5,17,30) are calculated from the following equation:
(1)
Where:  
The accumulation of heat is calculated from a function of temperature, P(T), where the
temperatures T1 through T4 are used to define the value of P by the
following formula:
When: 
When: 
When: 
When: 
Where: k is a scale factor set to a value of 10
Average P-Days(5,17,30) required for several stages of development are given
in Table 2.
Fractional Leaf Area
Comparison of observed and modeled values showed that fractional leaf area was
overestimated by the current method. A regression equation relating observed and modeled
values was calculated. The R2 value of 0.61 and root mean square error (RMSE)
of 0.15 suggest that there is room for improvement in this model.
Table 1.
Coefficients of variation for seven heat unit
systems for Brassica napus L. cv. 2273 and Quantum.
|
Heat Unit |
Thermal Time Accumulation Beginning
at: |
Stage |
Average
(3.1-5.4) |
|
2.2 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
5.2 |
5.4 |
5.5 |
|
Calendar Days |
Planting |
15.02 |
4.40 |
3.44 |
3.95 |
3.55 |
4.78 |
6.21 |
7.60 |
4.39 |
|
50%
emergence |
28.96 |
3.95 |
4.38 |
3.84 |
1.65 |
4.18 |
6.88 |
8.26 |
4.15 |
|
GDD
(5oC) |
Planting |
8.62 |
11.05 |
10.32 |
10.24 |
4.31 |
7.97 |
7.58 |
10.04 |
8.58 |
|
50%
emergence |
21.11 |
8.66 |
7.11 |
7.10 |
5.94 |
6.66 |
5.65 |
11.53 |
6.85 |
|
P-days
(5,17,30) |
Planting |
8.83 |
6.95 |
3.88 |
4.96 |
1.84 |
4.77 |
2.70 |
7.39 |
4.18 |
|
50%
emergence |
23.29 |
4.91 |
2.47 |
3.52 |
0.75 |
3.80 |
3.29 |
8.56 |
3.12 |
|
P-days
(5,16,30) |
Planting |
9.65 |
6.70 |
3.70 |
4.84 |
2.22 |
4.86 |
2.94 |
7.39 |
4.21 |
|
50%
emergence |
25.63 |
3.94 |
2.17 |
3.01 |
0.57 |
3.76 |
3.95 |
8.48 |
2.90 |
|
P-days
(5,18,30) |
Planting |
8.08 |
7.21 |
4.17 |
5.15 |
1.53 |
4.73 |
2.63 |
7.43 |
4.24 |
|
50%
emergence |
24.44 |
4.40 |
2.43 |
3.22 |
1.14 |
3.66 |
3.16 |
8.68 |
3.00 |
|
P-days
(5,17,34) |
Planting |
8.03 |
7.02 |
4.20 |
5.12 |
1.47 |
4.72 |
2.69 |
7.46 |
4.20 |
|
50%
emergence |
24.53 |
4.20 |
2.34 |
3.05 |
1.31 |
3.62 |
3.10 |
8.69 |
2.94 |
|
P-days
(5,17,32) |
Planting |
8.36 |
7.08 |
4.12 |
5.06 |
1.72 |
4.74 |
2.65 |
7.45 |
4.23 |
|
50%
emergence |
24.72 |
4.17 |
2.27 |
3.04 |
1.09 |
3.63 |
3.25 |
8.63 |
2.91 |
Table 2. Mean P-Days(5,17,30) for several stages of
development.
|
Phenologcial Development z |
Thermal Time Accumulation Beginning at: |
|
Description of Main Raceme |
Stage |
Planting |
50% emergence |
|
Rosette
(2nd true leaf) |
2.2 |
139.7 |
85.2 |
|
Bud
(flower cluster visible at center of rosette) |
3.1 |
299.0 |
244.9 |
|
Bud
(flower cluster raised above level of rosette) |
3.2 |
359.8 |
304.3 |
|
Flower
(many flowers open, pods elongating) |
4.2 |
419.2 |
363.7 |
|
Flower
(lower pods starting to fill) |
4.3 |
478.6 |
420.8 |
|
Ripening
(seeds in lower pods full size, translucent) |
5.1 |
528.7 |
475.5 |
|
Ripening
(seeds in lower pods green) |
5.2 |
583.3 |
528.8 |
|
Ripening
(seeds in lower pods yellow or brown) |
5.4 |
757.5 |
707.7 |
|
Ripening
(seeds in all pods brown, plant dead) |
5.5 |
835.9 |
778.1 |
Since there is a lack of empirical data estimating the fractional leaf area (LA)
from temperature, observed fractional leaf area (up to stage 5.2) was plotted against
growing degree-days above 5oC to determine the nature of the actual
relationship from stages 1.0-5.2 (Figure 2). The LA for the senescence phase of
the crop, that is stages 5.3 to 5.5 was not investigated in this study.
Figure 3 shows observed ground cover plotted against the P-Days(5,17,30). The
data was analyzed as two separate populations. The inflection point of 300 P-Days(5,17,30)
was chosen based on a visual assessment of the data. A linear portion
from 0 to 400 P-Days(5,17,30) had an improved linear relationship over that for
GDD above 5oC.
Soil Moisture
Modeled soil moisture was better estimated when on-site precipitation data was
available (Figure 4). Roblin 1999 and 2000 (on-site precipitation data) had an R2
of 0.83 and a RMSE of 2.32 mm while
sites with off-site precipitation had a substantially
lower R2 of 0.61 and a RMSE of 4.45 mm. Thus, precipitation is a key component
for modeling top-zone soil moisture in the canola phenology and water-use model. The
spatial variability of rainfall and the poor estimation of soil moisture at sites with
off-site precipitation data indicates that rainfall is the most important parameter (R. L.
Raddatz, personal communication, Environment Canada, Winnipeg, MB). In order to more
adequately assess the accuracy of the Canola Phenology and Water-Use Model, on site
precipitation data should be included. Thus, the third objective to assess modeled
top-zone soil moisture was only partially achieved.
Canola, Brassica napus L. is an important cash crop on the Canadian Prairies.
Sclerotinia stem rot is the most devastating disease of canola and afflicts all
canola-growing areas of Canada. Prairie canola producers expend $260 million annually as a
result of yield loss and management techniques requiring expensive fungicide applications
(G.B.H. Ash, personal communication, Canadian Wheat Board, Winnipeg, MB.). In terms of
farm gate value, canola was the number one crop in 1999 in Manitoba, with production
estimates of $401.3 million (Manitoba Agriculture 1999). As a result of this study,
improvements can be made to the Canola Phenology and Water-use Model (Raddatz 1993). This
will improve disease prediction of sclerotinia and facilitate the timely and efficient
application of fungicide thereby reducing losses due to sclerotinia stem rot and the
inappropriate use of fungicide. In addition, a better understanding of the factors that
affect the rate of phenological development of canola allows the incorporation of this
basic agronomic knowledge into other agrometeorological models to help improve the yields
of an extremely important cash crop on the Canadian Prairies.
Acknowledgements:
This project was made possible due to the funding from the Governments of Manitoba and
Canada through the Manitoba Canada Agri-Food Research and Development Initiative (ARDI).
References:
Lamari, L. 2002. Assess for Windows: Image Analysis for disease quantification. APS
Press ed. (In Press) (Formerly ImageX32 for Windows, Version 1.0)
Manitoba Agriculture. 1999. Manitoba Agricultural Yearbook, 1999. 203 pp.
Oke, T. R. 1987. Boundary Layer Climates. 2nd ed. Routledge, London.
435 pp |