
Soil is essential to human survival. We rely on it for the production of food, fibre, timber and energy crops. Together with climate, the soil determines which crops can be grown, where, and how much they will yield. In addition to supporting our agricultural needs, we rely on the soil to regulate the flow of rainwater and to act as a filter for drinking water. With such a tremendously important role, it is imperative that we manage our soils for their long-term productivity, sustainability and health.
The first step in sustainable soil management is ensuring that
the soil will support the land use activity. For example, only
the better agricultural soils in Manitoba will support grain and
vegetable production, while more marginal agricultural soils
will support forage and pasture-based production. For this
reason, agricultural development should only occur in areas
where the soil resource will support the agricultural activity.
The only way to do this is to understand the soil resource that
is available. Soil survey information is the key to
understanding the soil resource.
A soil survey describes the characteristics of the soils in a given area, classifies the soils according to a standard system of classification, plots the boundaries of the soils on a map, and makes predictions about the behaviour of soils. The different uses of the soils and how the response of management affects them are considered in designing and carrying out the survey. The information collected in a soil survey helps in the development of land-use plans and evaluates and predicts the effects of land use on the environment. Adapted from the USDA definition of ‘soil survey’.
Soil
survey is simply an inventory of the properties of the soil
(such as texture, internal drainage, parent material, depth to
groundwater, topography, degree of erosion, stoniness, pH, and
salinity) and their spatial distribution over a landscape. Soils
are grouped into similar types and their boundaries are
delineated on a map. Each soil type has a unique set of
physical, chemical and mineralogical characteristics and has
similar reactions to use and management.
Soil interpretation refers to the behaviour and response of soils
to human activities. The information assembled in a soil survey
can be used to predict or estimate the potentials and
limitations of the soils’ behaviour under different uses. As
such, soil surveys can be used to plan the development of new
lands or to evaluate the conversion of land to new uses. Soil
surveys also provide insight into the kind and intensity of land
management that will be needed. An example of soil survey
interpretation is the evaluation of a given landbase for manure
application. The type of soil and its associated characteristics
determine the crops that can be grown, their yield potentials,
the quantities of nutrients that are needed and the field
practices that will be necessary to maintain optimum soil
conditions for plant growth. As well, soil data on permeability
(the rate at which water moves through a soil), depth to
groundwater, flooding, slope gradient, soil texture and depth to
bedrock can be useful in determining the risk of groundwater
contamination due to leaching or surface water contamination due
to runoff and erosion.
Reconnaissance, or small-scale, soil surveys were started in
1926 in Manitoba as the first step in the development of a basic
program of soil research, education, conservation and use for
the province. The first reconnaissance soil survey for Manitoba
was published in 1940 for the south western area. It was at a
small-scale of 1:126,000 or ½ inch to 1 mile. Although
reconnaissance soil surveys have improved with aerial
photography and interpretation since the 1940s, these maps are
still based on only a small number of site investigations per
section of land (approximately 6 inspections per 640 acres) and
the soil map units identify only the dominant soil groups.
The first large-scale, or detailed, soil survey in Manitoba was
published in 1972 for the Portage la Prairie area at a scale of
1:20,000. Detailed soil surveys identify more of the variation
in soil types across smaller landscapes. Detailed soil survey
maps are much more accurate and reliable for making decisions at
the farm-level (Table 1). They are created
from much more intensive site investigations ranging from 16 to
30 per section of land.
Table 1. Number of inspections and
intended uses for soil survey maps according to scale.
|
Reconnaissance 1:125,000 |
Semi-Detailed 1:50,000 |
Detailed 1:20,000 |
Detailed 1:5000 |
|
Increasing level of information """""""" |
|||
|
General soils awareness |
General on-farm
planning |
Detailed on-farm |
Research plots |
|
~6 inspections/section |
~ 16 inspections/section |
~30 inspections/section |
~128 inspections/section |
|
General soil comparisons (subgroup/family/association level) National scope Science projects Starting point for more detailed soils data collection |
Field scale comparisons (series and phase level) Watershed management Land use assessment |
Field scale comparisons (series and phase level) Precision agriculture Irrigation assessment Potato suitability Nutrient management Land use assessment |
Field scale comparisons (series and phase level) Precision agriculture Irrigation assessment Potato suitability Nutrient management Land use assessment |
The recent intensification of agriculture, coupled with serious water quality issues throughout North America, has increased the public’s concern about agriculture’s management of chemicals, fertilizers and livestock manure. In response to the public’s concern, there are many new initiatives being developed in Manitoba that use soil survey information to direct on-farm management practices. These activities include:
The success of many of these activities will depend on the availability of
reliable, detailed soil survey information upon which the on-farm decisions are
made. Unfortunately, currently only about 30% of agro-Manitoba has detailed soil
survey. Essentially, there is virtually no detailed soil survey information for
the Northwest region and very little for the Eastern-Interlake Region.
Approximately 3/4 of the Central Region has detailed soil survey and
approximately 1/3 of the Southwest Region.
In many instances, when detailed soil survey information is not available, it is
substituted with reconnaissance level information. Unfortunately, reconnaissance
soil survey data is not reliable enough for making on-farm management decisions.
Soil survey maps are not without limitations. Although the map may say that a
discrete area of land contains a certain soil type, it must be understood that
the reliability of that information is a function of the map scale. All soil
delineations (called polygons) contain small areas of dissimilar soils that are
not identified (called inclusions). The smaller the scale of the map (or the
more general the map), the more frequently this occurs. Small-scale,
reconnaissance or general soil surveys give only a broad picture of the dominant
types and distribution of soils that occur over relatively large areas. The
landscape may actually include fairly significant areas of different soils that
are not identified on the map. As such, reconnaissance soil surveys are best
suited to making general comparisons of soil capabilities and limitations on a
regional, national or even worldwide scale. They are not reliable for making
on-farm decisions as they lack the detail necessary to describe the variation in
the soil types on the farm (Table 1).
In addition to the limitations of map scale, the boundaries of the soil map
polygons imply there are abrupt changes in soil types within the landscape. In
reality, however, soil varies continuously across the landscape. It must be
recognized that, although the map lines imply abrupt changes, the soil grades
from one type to the next and the lines on the map are only approximations of
where these transitions occur.
The limitations of soil survey were summarized very simply by Hubert Byrd (Soil
Survey Horizons) when he wrote:
"It is nature which controls the areal variability of soils,
not soil scientists"
Similarly, it can be stated that it is nature which controls the areal variability of soils, not maps.
When
detailed soil survey data is needed but unavailable, on-site investigations are
necessary. On-farm soil survey can be designed for a specific purpose or general
purpose. A specific or single purpose survey may be appropriate when there is
only one, well-defined objective (such as siting a livestock operation). In this
instance, only the information required to meet the single objective may need to
be collected. The major advantage to a single purpose survey is decreased cost.
A general-purpose survey, on the other hand, contains a wider range of
information. Although more information is more costly to collect, the
general-purpose soil survey may have more value over the long-term as it can be
interpreted in a variety of ways and can be reused for many purposes.
Whether single or general purpose, soil survey begins with field inspections to
a depth of approximately 1 meter and collecting information about the physical,
chemical and biological properties of the soil. Differences in soil colour,
texture and pH within the soil profile are then related to the surrounding
landscape in order to determine soil type and predict behaviour. The reliability
of the field data and its interpretation is largely dependent on the experience
and ability of the surveyor. As soil survey expertise is scarce, data collection
by less experienced individuals should always follow standardized procedures and
should only be carried out by those who have received training in soil survey.
For further information, contact your GO Representative.