LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF MANITOBA

Monday, April 6, 1992

 

The House met at 1:30 a.m.

 

Mr. Clerk (William Remnant):  It is my duty to inform the House of the unavoidable absence of Mr. Speaker, and therefore, in accordance with the statutes, I would ask the Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Dacquay) to take the Chair.

 

PRAYERS

 

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS

 

PRESENTING PETITIONS

 

Ms. Marianne Cerilli (Radisson):  I beg to present the petition of Jennifer Dubienski, Debbie Clement, Carol Pawluk and others requesting the Minister of Justice (Mr. McCrae) call upon the Parliament of Canada to amend the Criminal Code to prevent the release of individuals where there is a substantial likelihood of further family violence.

Ms. Becky Barrett (Wellington):  Madam Deputy Speaker, I beg to present the petition of Maureen Neudorf, Fredricka Czapla, Doreen Szor and others requesting the government show its strong commitment to dealing with child abuse by considering restoring the Fight Back Against Child Abuse Campaign.

Mr. Daryl Reid (Transcona):  I beg to present the petition of Dawn Thompson, Royden L. Walsh, Paul Robillard and others requesting the Minister of Justice (Mr. McCrae) call upon the Parliament of Canada to amend the Criminal Code to prevent the release of individuals where there is substantial likelihood of further family violence.

Mr. George Hickes (Point Douglas):  I beg to present the petition of Patricia Harder, John Sinclair, Steven Gabriel and others requesting that the government show its strong commitment to aboriginal self‑government by considering reversing its position on the AJI by supporting the recommendations within its jurisdiction and implementing a separate and parallel justice system.

Mr. Conrad Santos (Broadway):  I beg to present the petition of Charles Toop, Alison Stanwick, Cornelia Vandenberg and others requesting the Minister of Justice (Mr. McCrae) call upon the Parliament of Canada to amend the Criminal Code to prevent the release of individuals where there is substantial likelihood of further family violence.

 

READING AND RECEIVING PETITIONS

       

Madam Deputy Speaker (Louise Dacquay):  I have reviewed the petition of the honourable member, and it complies with the privileges and practices of the House and complies with the rules (by leave).  Is it the will of the House to have the petition read?

       The petition of the undersigned citizens of the province of Manitoba humbly sheweth:

       THAT locally controlled public housing with elected and appointed board members encourages democratic and accountable decision making; and

       Many housing authority boards included tenants on the board of directors; and

       Volunteers serving on boards made worthwhile contributions to local housing authorities by serving their tenants, their community and in saving taxpayers' money; and

       With no consultation, the provincial government fired 600 volunteer board members, abolished 98 local housing authorities, laid off staff and centralized purchasing and administration;

       WHEREFORE your petitioners humbly pray that the Legislature of the Province of Manitoba may be pleased to request that the Minister of Housing (Mr. Ernst) consider reinstating local housing authorities with volunteer boards. (Ms. Wowchuk)

* * *

* (1335)

       I have reviewed the petition of the honourable member, and it complies with the privileges and practices of the House and complies with the rules.  Is it the will of the House to have the petition read?

       The petition of the undersigned residents of the province of Manitoba humbly sheweth that:

       WHEREAS there has been increased provincial involvement in matters of immigration settlement, English as a Second Language programs, and other immigration matters; and

       WHEREAS the Department of External Affairs has made a decision to discontinue the practice of processing applications of domestic workers under rules that would give them the right to apply for permanent status under the Foreign Domestic Program; and

       WHEREAS this decision will have a negative impact upon both employers and domestics; and

       WHEREAS domestic workers perform a valuable child care service in today's labour market, especially in two‑income families;

       WHEREFORE your petitioners humbly pray that the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba strongly urge the provincial government to contact the federal Minister of Employment and Immigration and request in the strongest possible terms that the Foreign Domestic Program be fully reinstated immediately and that the government be requested to report to the Legislature with regard to progress being made in regard to this issue. (Mr. Lamoureux)

 

MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS AND TABLING OF REPORTS

       

Hon. Jim Ernst (Minister of Housing):  I would like to table, Madam Deputy Speaker, the Annual Report of the Manitoba Housing and Renewal Corporation for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1991.

Hon. Eric Stefanson (Minister responsible for Sport):  Madam Deputy Speaker, I have a ministerial statement.

       It is with great pleasure that I rise before the members today and, on behalf of the province and citizens of Manitoba, extend congratulations to Connie Laliberte and her Fort Rouge rink of Laurie Allen, Cathy Gauthier, Janet Arnott and Arlene MacLeod on finishing in third place at the world championships held in Garnish‑Partenkirchen, Germany, and as well to Vic Peters and his rink of Dan Carey, Chris Neufeld, Don Rudd and John Loxton from the Granite Curling Club, who also finished in third place at the world championships.

       I am certain those who followed the progress of each of the rinks throughout the week would agree that the Manitoba teams represented our province and country extremely well at the world championships.  By finishing in third place, they proved that they both should be recognized as among the best rinks in the world.  Manitoba certainly has much to be proud of with the performance of their rinks at the world championships as well as winning the national titles in curling.

       I would ask all members to join me in extending congratulations to the Laliberte and Peters rinks on their excellent performances throughout the year.  Their exciting play has been a pleasure to watch.

       Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker.

Mr. Clif Evans (Interlake):  Madam Deputy Speaker, it is with great pleasure that we on our side extend our congratulations to Vic Peters and his rink, Connie Laliberte and her rink for their fine performance at the recent world curling championships.

       We had the pleasure of watching them over the past week with great anticipation for their performance throughout the week, and I am sure, along with the rest of Manitoba and Canada, we are disappointed and at the same time very proud that our two rinks were able to represent our country and our province to the extent of their great finish.  We here in this side offer our sincerest congratulations to them.

Mr. Reg Alcock (Osborne):  Madam Deputy Speaker, I would simply like to join with the others in this House in congratulating Connie and Vic.  I had an opportunity to be part of their sendoff at the Fort Rouge Club.  I know people have watched each rock with great interest and are saddened that they did not come back in first place, but are thrilled that they were able to make third and are looking forward to welcoming them back.

 

Introduction of Guests

Madam Deputy Speaker:  Prior to Oral Questions, I would like to draw the attention of all honourable members to the Speaker's Gallery, where we have with us this afternoon, President Rod MacCrae and other members of the St. Andrews Society of Winnipeg representing the MacCrae Clan, Douglas Clan, MacIntosh Clan, MacFarland Clan, MacGregor Clan, Fraser Clan, Ross Clan and MacPherson Clan.

       On behalf of all honourable members, I welcome you here today.

       Additionally, I would like to draw the attention of all honourable members to the Speaker's loge to my left, where we have with us this afternoon the former member for Radisson.

* (1340)

 

ORAL QUESTION PERIOD

 

Health Care Facilities

Bed Closures

 

Ms. Judy Wasylycia-Leis (St. Johns):  Madam Deputy Speaker, the Premier (Mr. Filmon) made a lot of campaign promises about health care, promises which are ringing hollow in light of the real Conservative agenda on health care reform.

       I refer the House back to April of 1988, specifically Tuesday, April 28, 1988.  The Premier said, a Tory government would not close any hospital beds until a thorough review of the health care system is completed.  Later, the Minister of Health tried to clarify that commitment by saying that there would be no bed closures for budgetary reasons.  Well, Madam Deputy Speaker, we have received a number of letters recently and calls from patients of several different hospitals about being kept in emergency room hallways on a stretcher for periods of five days and even up to 10 days.

       We want to know from the Premier why his government is breaking an election promise, why this Premier is compromising patient care by ordering Winnipeg hospitals to empty 440 beds and to cut $27 million from their budgets by the year 1994, without the benefit of a comprehensive review and without the benefit of public and professional input.

Hon. Donald Orchard (Minister of Health):  Madam Deputy Speaker, I look forward to this afternoon's debate in Estimates, because I know that you will not allow me the opportunity for a full answer to a rather long preamble, et cetera.

       I know my honourable friend is wanting to discuss health care, the provision of services, the funding of the system.  My honourable friend wants to discuss it in terms of system‑wide change and reform, which from time to time, Madam Deputy Speaker, even members of the New Democratic Party have acknowledged is going to happen.  Even from time to time, although not publicly, my honourable friends in the New Democratic Party acknowledge that the system will change and change significantly away from institutional care to community‑based care, such as is happening from time to time when my honourable friends in private have the honesty to discuss the rather significant and radical changes happening in provinces currently governed by their political soul mates.

       Madam Deputy Speaker, let me deal with the issue that my honourable friend wants to talk about in terms of a plan and understanding of the system and where the system can change to meet a number of agendas that Canadians have put before all of our elected representatives, whether it be in Manitoba, whether it be in Saskatchewan, whether it be in Ontario, whether it be in New Brunswick.

       What we are doing in Manitoba is working through the most extensive public consultation process ever launched in the history of the province of Manitoba beginning in 1988 with the Health Advisory Network, which structured committees which met with the public to seek their opinions; beginning with two discussion papers on mental health reform to move the system from institution to community‑based care‑‑more consultation around that area of health service delivery than ever before in the history of the province of Manitoba; the creation of the Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation, with now publicly released discussion documents so that Manitobans can understand what their system is doing for them.

       I look forward to furthering my answer later on this afternoon, but certainly this afternoon, in Estimates where I know I will hear from the wisdom of my honourable friend as to how the system should change.

 

Misericordia Hospital

Funding

 

Ms. Judy Wasylycia-Leis (St. Johns):  Madam Deputy Speaker, I am asking the Premier today because of that kind of answer persistently and consistently from the Minister of Health.  We are not getting clear answers.  The public is getting concerned, and the Premier made this election promise.

       I would like to ask the Premier, since the minister in this House stated that hospitals would be getting in the neighbourhood of 4 percent to 5 percent increases in their budgets, yet hospitals are telling us a different story, will the Premier confirm that the Misericordia Hospital is receiving the same funding as it received last year resulting in a zero percent increase?  Will he give us a breakdown, finally, of the exact increase for each hospital so that health care, consumers and patients can be assured that they will continue to receive quality health care services in their community?

Hon. Donald Orchard (Minister of Health):  Madam Deputy Speaker, I know my honourable friend wants to always describe increase in funding as cutbacks.  That is sort of the new nuance of language that New Democrats in opposition use.  New Democrats in opposition call a $100‑plus million dollars of increased funding to health care in this year's budget, a cutback from opposition in Manitoba, but in Ontario‑‑and incidentally, that represents a 5.7 percent increase.  Now, $53 million of that goes to fund our hospitals, not $53 million less, as is happening in Saskatchewan, but $53 million more.  That transmits into a full half of the increase that we are providing in health care to fund the system, $53 million out of over $100 million going to our hospital system.  Now in the newspeak of New Democrats from opposition, that is a cutback.

* (1345)

       The budgetary process that the hospitals are going through is as it has been for years.  They make requests of government.  We cannot accede to the dollars they ask for.  Therefore, they are provided funding at a level which the taxpayers of Manitoba will allow.  The same process that was in place when my honourable friend was in government is in place today.

       Madam Deputy Speaker, with a little patience from my honourable friend, we can deal with that issue when we get to the hospital line with full detail, full discussion and full suggestion as to how to do things better as the New Democrats would no doubt wish to do.

 

Health Care Facilities

Bed Closures

 

Ms. Judy Wasylycia-Leis (St. Johns):  Madam Deputy Speaker, we on this side of the House are not saying hospitals are getting zero percent increase.  It is the hospitals that are saying they are getting zero percent increase.  We are not spreading gloom and doom, it is hospitals saying we have to get through these difficult days.

       We have been trying for days to find out what is the exact nature of the government‑directed bed and budget reduction for each hospital in the province of Manitoba.  I have a simple, straightforward question for the Premier (Mr. Filmon) today, who made an election promise not to cut any beds without a comprehensive review.

       What is the policy of this government on bed closures in our hospitals?

Hon. Donald Orchard (Minister of Health):  Madam Deputy Speaker, with all due respect to my honourable friend, my honourable friend knows full well that there were no bed closures during our first term of government, 1988‑1990, for budgetary purposes.  My honourable friend knows that.  My honourable friend cannot accept that because during the time when she was around government, they ordered the closure of 120‑plus beds for budgetary reasons.

       Also at that time when my honourable friend sat in that Treasury Board‑‑not Treasury Board but in cabinet, there was a policy put in place by the New Democratic Party under Howard Pawley.  It said, there shall be no deficits in the hospital budgets.

       The first piece of advice that the Deputy Minister, Mr. Reg Edwards, gave me in May of 1988, when I was sworn in as Minister of Health and had my first briefing meeting, his first question was, do you intend to change the no‑deficit policy put in place by the previous government.  My answer was, no.

       My answer is consistent today, but not according to my honourable friend from the New Democrats who when in Brandon are demanding now that we cover deficits to break the policy that they put in place in 1987.

       Madam Deputy Speaker, that is the kind of classic hypocrisy and flip‑flop that New Democrats practise from opposition and claim they can solve all the problems, but in government unilaterally cut beds, reduce budgets, et cetera, a two‑faced approach to health care policy that Manitobans are wise to.

 

Brandon General Hospital

Funding

 

Mr. Leonard Evans (Brandon East):  Madam Deputy Speaker, I have a question for the Minister of Health.  Last Thursday, over 500 very angry and frustrated people attended the first ever public meeting in Brandon to protest cutbacks in service at the Brandon General Hospital and the layoffs of nearly 30 licensed practical nurses.

       Meanwhile, a petition has been signed by over 5,000 people in Westman, representing over 84 communities in southwestern Manitoba, expressing serious concern over the closing of the existing palliative care ward and the gynecological ward.

       A straightforward question, Madam Deputy Speaker, on behalf of over 5,000 citizens and taxpayers of southwestern Manitoba, I would ask this Minister of Health if he will provide and ensure additional sufficient funding for Brandon General Hospital so that the level of services such as the palliative care ward is not diminished or downgraded in any way.

Hon. Donald Orchard (Minister of Health):  Madam Deputy Speaker, I did not think my honourable friend the member for Brandon East would have the audacity to ask such a question, because what my honourable friend is asking this government to do is to reverse the New Democratic Party policy, put in place when he was in cabinet under Howard Pawley, of no deficits at Brandon General Hospital or any other hospital.  That was a policy put in place by the New Democrats.  Now from opposition, my honourable friend the New Democrat from Brandon East, is saying, oh, reverse that; cover deficits.

       Madam Deputy Speaker, I want to read from a January 1987 letter from the Honourable Len Evans, senior cabinet minister in Brandon and Westman area.  First paragraph:  I would like to point out that when we subtract the 31 closed beds, closed by the NDP‑‑in parentheses:  mine added, the number of beds available at Brandon Cornwallis residence is 253, which is still considerably higher than the 200 beds needed to meet MHSC guidelines.

* (1350)

       The second paragraph of this letter, Madam Deputy Speaker: You should understand that the decision to close beds at Brandon General Hospital was made by the Board of Directors of the hospital because of a large deficit.

       My honourable friend, when he was in government, forced them to close beds because of a deficit and now in opposition says we should give them the money‑‑what hypocrisy.

Mr. Leonard Evans:  I have a supplementary question, but I had hoped that I would have received the answers for‑‑

Madam Deputy Speaker:  Order, please.  The honourable member for Brandon East to put his question now.

Mr. Leonard Evans:  On behalf of these people I am asking, 5,000‑plus people from Westman which includes just about every constituency that is represented on that side, will the minister review the operation of the Brandon General Hospital and determine whether those specific cutbacks in services are appropriate?  That is, does the minister believe that the Brandon General Hospital administration‑‑

Madam Deputy Speaker:  Order, please.  The question has been put.

Mr. Orchard:  Madam Deputy Speaker, what I am going to do to those 5,000 petitioners, should I receive the petition, is send them the letter sent to them in 1987 by the Honourable Len Evans, because it actually deals with the issue, not honestly but at least openly.

       The second thing I want to do to my honourable friend, for my honourable friend‑‑I do not do things to him‑‑I want to read an answer from a Health minister, a colleague of mine across Canada.  This Health minister says the policy established as of 1989 is that deficits will not be funded.  We continue to put in place and support that policy.  You know who is saying that, Madam Deputy Speaker?‑‑the New Democratic Health minister in Ontario, because she understands health care.  The same understanding that my honourable friend, the member for Brandon East (Mr. Leonard Evans) spoke of so eloquently in his letter of 1987.

       My honourable friend has selective amnesia when he is in opposition.  He goes underground when they cut beds‑‑back in his days around cabinet responsibility‑‑and then comes out of the bushes now saying we should cover deficits.  Is that a reversal of the policy because, Madam Deputy Speaker, the policy stands: no deficits to be funded by government in the hospitals of Manitoba.

 

Labour Adjustment Strategy

 

Mr. Leonard Evans (Brandon East):  A minister of broken promises‑‑

Madam Deputy Speaker:  Order.  Does the honourable member for Brandon East have a final supplementary question?

Mr. Leonard Evans:  I have another very serious question and I hope we will get some answers, because they have not for those 5,000 people yet.  We are still waiting for an answer.  On behalf of the workers, will the minister and this government commit some funds to allow the laid off nurses to take training for other health care occupations?

       There is an industrial adjustment committee looking at alternative employment for the affected nurses, but there are not enough funds‑‑

Madam Deputy Speaker:  Order, please.  The question has been put.

Hon. Donald Orchard (Minister of Health):  Madam Deputy Speaker, I hope my honourable friend shows up in Estimates this afternoon because I have a lot more information for him.

       In 1987‑88, the last year my honourable friend was around cabinet, the revenues of the province of Manitoba grew by 19.2 percent.  Do you know what they gave Brandon General Hospital as an increase that year‑‑5 percent, when the inflation rate was 4.2 percent.  Do you know what we did last year?  Our revenues were growing by 2.5 percent, inflation was 5.1 percent and we gave 7.6 percent more money to the Brandon General Hospital.

       Within that budget‑‑[interjection]

Madam Deputy Speaker:  Order, please.

Mr. Orchard:  Madam Deputy Speaker, I am going to recommend rabies shots for the member for Brandon East.

 

Point of Order

       

Mr. Steve Ashton (Opposition House Leader):  On a point of order, one would be tempted to respond, especially from that minister, in kind, but one should recognize that is not parliamentary. Quite frankly, Madam Deputy Speaker, we are growing increasingly frustrated by the fact that this minister will not give answers, instead totally avoids the legitimate question being asked by the member for Brandon on behalf of 5,000 residents in southwestern Manitoba.  He ought not to make those kinds of comments‑‑

* (1355)

Madam Deputy Speaker:  Order, please.  The honourable government House leader on the same point of order.

Hon. Clayton Manness (Government House Leader):  On the same point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker, I have looked at the list of unparliamentary words and certainly the word referenced by the Minister of Health (Mr. Orchard) is not on that list.

       I would ask you to bring the opposition House leader to order because under the guise of a point of order, he himself engaged in a tirade on the Minister of Health, and I would say that certainly is out of order.

Madam Deputy Speaker:  The honourable member for Thompson did not have a point of order.  However, I would remind all honourable members to address each other courteously in the House.

* * *

Mr. Orchard:  Madam Deputy Speaker, I am neither a medical doctor nor a veterinarian.  I apologize to my honourable friend the member for Brandon East (Mr. Leonard Evans).

 

North American Free Trade Agreement

Water Sales

 

Mr. Reg Alcock (Osborne):  Madam Deputy Speaker, I have a question for the minister responsible for Trade.

       In reviewing the draft agreement for the North American free trade agreement that is being proposed, I discovered in Article 1401, a provision that is not in the bracketed text but is in the already‑agreed‑to portions of the agreement that suggest that we will allow the transportation of materials other than energy that require transportation by pipeline.

       I would like to know from the minister whether or not in his meetings in Ottawa there were any discussions about the previously existing prohibitions on the sale of water south of the border and whether or not this agreement, which apparently has the agreement of all three parties, violates those sections of the FTA.

Hon. Eric Stefanson (Minister of Industry, Trade and Tourism): Madam Deputy Speaker, at the last Trade ministers' meeting in Ottawa we were provided, at the conclusion of that meeting, with the draft text.  So we have not had a meeting subsequent to receiving the draft text.

       As I have indicated in this House on a couple of occasions, we are in the process of completing a detailed review of the text to do an all‑encompassing response to several concerns that have come to light as a result of reviewing the draft text that we currently have a copy of.  Certainly, the honourable member raises one further point that merits part of that review.

Mr. Alcock:  Madam Deputy Speaker, the minister has had a couple of weeks now and had officials working on it for a couple of weeks.  I wonder if he can tell us whether or not their review confirms that there is an intention to ship water south of the border.

Mr. Stefanso