Manitoba English/French bannersow.gif (1235 bytes)
search form follows ministers linkhome.gif (192 bytes)minister-off.gif (613 bytes)
  


headingex.gif (3898 bytes)

Celebrating Women's History
Rediscover our history by learning about the
women who helped to create it.  

 

The Famous Five and the Persons Case

On October 18, 1929, a landmark legal decision for Canadian women was made when women were legally recognized as "persons" under British common law. The decision was made necessary because The British North America Act, which governed Canada at the time, used the word "persons" when it referred to more than one person and the word "he" when it referred to one person. Those who wanted to keep women from being appointed as judges and senators claimed that women weren't eligible for these positions because they weren't recognized as persons under the law.

Five Canadian women disputed this claim. They were Judge Emily Murphy, the first magistrate in the British Empire; Henrietta Muir Edwards, Convenor of Laws for the National Council of Women; Louise McKinney, the first woman elected to a legislature in the British Empire; Irene Parlby, an Albertan cabinet minister; and Nellie McClung, the writer who was instrumental in making Manitoba the first province to grant women the right to vote.

These "Famous Five" women first went to the Supreme Court of Canada, which decided the word "persons" did not include women. Undaunted, they took the case to the Privy Council of Great Britain, which, in those days, was Canada's highest court. The Privy Council ruled "that the exclusion of women from all public offices is a relic of days more barbarous than ours...And to those who would ask why the word "persons" should include females, the obvious answer is, 'Why should it not?'"


For Discussion Purposes:

(a) At the time of the historic "Persons Case", the Privy Council of Great Britain was the highest court in Canada, overseeing The British North America Act. Why was Canada's highest court located in England?

(b) The "Persons Case" was a stepping stone in the continuing struggle towards women's economic, social and political equality. Why was it so important?

(c) What other "firsts" were made by members of the "Famous Five" who have been honoured in Ottawa with a statue recognizing their accomplishments?

(d) The "Persons Case" only reflected on the status of British-Canadian women. Why do you think immigrant and Aboriginal women were not included?

(e) Throughout history, unpaid work has often been unrecognized and undervalued. Women have always provided the majority of this work. Discuss this issue in terms of home-based work such as housework and childcare. Also, look at the work that women have done outside the home on the farm, in the labour market and with volunteer organizations.

(f) For the first time, the 1996 Census of Canada included questions on the contributions by women and men to unpaid work. Do you think this is a good idea and why? How much money do you think it's worth to the Canadian economy if we had to pay for this unpaid work?

 

 

Return to:
Women's History Month

Publications

 

Government Links:   home | welcome | on-line services | news | help | departments | contact | privacy