LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF MANITOBA

Thursday, March 6, 2025


The House met at 1:30 p.m.

The Speaker: Order, please. Please be seated.

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS

House Business

The Speaker: The hon­our­able Gov­ern­ment House Leader, on House Busi­ness.

Hon. Nahanni Fontaine (Government House Leader): On House busi­ness, Hon­our­able Speaker, could you please canvass the House for leave to allow the member for The Pas-Kameesak (Ms. Lathlin) to second the motions at all stages for Bill 41, The Reporting of Supports for Child Survivors of Sexual Assault (Trained Health Pro­fes­sionals and Evidence Collection Kits) Amend­ment Act?

The Speaker: Is there leave to allow the member for The Pas-Kameesak (Ms. Lathlin) to second the motions at all stages for Bill 41?

      Is there leave? [Agreed]

Introduction of Bills

Bill 27–The Income Tax Amendment Act

Hon. Adrien Sala (Minister of Finance): I move, seconded by the Minister for Agri­cul­ture, that Bill 27, The Income Tax Amend­ment Act; Loi modifiant la Loi de l'impôt sur le revenue, be now read for a first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Sala: I'm very pleased to intro­duce Bill 27, The Income Tax Amend­ment Act.

      The bill makes the cultural industries printing tax credit permanent, simplifies several formulas used to calculate various tax credits and removes outdated references to previous taxation years.

      Thank you, Hon­our­able Speaker.

The Speaker: Is it the will of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 223–The Official Time Amendment Act, 2025

Mr. Ron Schuler (Springfield-Ritchot): I move, seconded by the member for Interlake-Gimli (Mr. Johnson), that Bill 223, The Official Time Amend­ment Act, 2025, be now read a for a first time.

Motion presented.

Mr. Schuler: I am pleased to intro­duce Bill 223, the official time amend­ment act. Currently, the official time amend­ment act will come into force on pro­clamation to discontinue the seasonal time change from daylight saving time.

      This bill will amend the com­mence­ment so that it will come into force on March 8, 2026, instead.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 28–The Manitoba Hydro Amendment Act

Hon. Adrien Sala (Minister of Finance): I move, seconded by the Minister for Health, Seniors and Long-Term Care, that Bill 28, The Manitoba Hydro Amend­ment Act; Loi modifiant la Loi sur l'hydro Manitoba, be now read a first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Sala: I'm very pleased to intro­duce Bill 28, The Manitoba Hydro Amend­ment Act. This legis­lation follows through on a key commit­ment in our gov­ern­ment's affordable energy plan to ensure that Manitobans get the best possible economic return on our clean, renewable energy.

      In our affordable energy plan, we committed to ending Manitoba Hydro's first-come, first-served approach for large grid connections. With this legis­lation, we will create a new framework where large grid connections are prioritized based on the econo­mic benefits provided to Manitoba.

      Let me put it simply: Manitoba's clean, baseload power is one of our greatest economic assets. It's a key natural advantage over other juris­dic­tions, but for far too long, important economic dev­elop­ment op­por­tun­ities have been stalled by the first-come, first-served approach

      By prioritizing requests for new large grid con­nec­tions that maximize benefits for Manitobans, we can promote economic dev­elop­ment, create more jobs and build the Manitoba for the future.

      Hon­our­able Speaker, I'm very pleased to present this bill to the House for its con­sid­era­tion.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 42–The Buy Canadian Act
(Government Purchases Act Amended)

Hon. Mintu Sandhu (Minister of Public Service Delivery): I move, seconded by the Minister of Busi­ness, Mining, Trade and Job Creation (Mr. Moses), that Bill 42, The Buy Canadian Act (Gov­ern­ment Purchases Act Amended), now be read a first time.

      Thank you.

Motion presented.

MLA Sandhu: Hon­our­able Speaker, Canada will never become the 51st state.

      In light of pressing economic challenges imposed by US tariffs, our gov­ern­ment is standing up for Manitobans, standing up for Canadians. This bill signals our gov­ern­ment's commit­ment to prioritizing goods and services that are made in Canada.

      This bill directs the gov­ern­ment to esta­blish a buy Canadian policy. This policy would outline the steps gov­ern­ment will take to stand up for Manitoba jobs and local economy.

      Thank you, Hon­our­able Speaker.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 37–The Manitoba Financial Services Authority Act and Amendments to Various Other Acts

Hon. Adrien Sala (Minister of Finance): I move, seconded by the Minister of Busi­ness, Mining, Trade and Job Creation, that Bill 37, The Manitoba Financial Services Author­ity Act and Amend­ments to Various Other Acts; Loi sur l'Autorité des services financiers du Manitoba et modifiant diverses autres lois, be now read a first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Sala: I'm very pleased to intro­duce Bill 37, The Manitoba Financial Services Author­ity Act and Amend­ments to Various Other Acts.

      This bill is another in a series of measures our gov­ern­ment is taking to modernize our financial statutes, to enable economic growth and create jobs. This bill will modernize the regula­tory structure in Manitoba by reconstituting the Manitoba Financial Services Agency to a board‑governed statutory cor­por­ation that would formally operate at arms‑length from gov­ern­ment.

      Virtually all other provinces have moved in this direction, including British Columbia in 1996, Ontario in 1997, Alberta in 2000, Quebec in 2002 and Saskatchewan in 2012. If we're going to grow our financial services industry in Manitoba, we need a modern, regula­tory structure, and that's exactly what this bill will deliver.

      Hon­our­able Speaker, I'm very pleased to present this bill to the House for con­sid­era­tion.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 10–The Residential Tenancies Amendment Act

Hon. Mintu Sandhu (Minister of Public Service Delivery): I move, seconded by the Minister of Finance, that Bill 10, The Resi­den­tial Tenancies Amend­ment Act (2), be now read for the first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Sandhu: The Resi­den­tial Tenancies Act is being amended to better support tenants who have been displaced from their rental buildings when they are forced to evacuate due to a prov­incial or munici­pal order or the tenancy is otherwise frustrated through no fault of their own.

* (13:40)

      The bill–this–the bill represents the first step in the gov­ern­ment's commit­ment and mandate to review The Resi­den­tial Tenancies Act to strengthen renters' rights and protect affordable housing in the province.

      Thank you, Hon­our­able Speaker.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 25–The Public-Private Partnerships Transparency and Accountability Act

Hon. Mintu Sandhu (Minister of Public Service Delivery): I move, seconded by the Minister of Educa­tion and Early Child­hood Learning (MLA Schmidt), that Bill 25, The Public‑Private Part­ner­ships Trans­par­ency and Accountability Act, be now read a first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Sandhu: It is my great pleasure to rise today to intro­duce The Public‑Private Part­ner­ships Trans­par­ency and Accountability Act. The purpose of this bill is to increase trans­par­ency and accountability to Manitobans when the public sector is selected as a public-private part­ner­ship procurement model, also known as P3.

      This bill ensures that benefits be evaluated, made public to keep the gov­ern­ment accountable. This bill ensures accountability and trans­par­ency of all P3 capital projects. These steps include the following: conducting a preliminary analysis before initiating pro­­curement process for major capital projects; con­ducting public con­sul­ta­tions to provide reasonable op­por­tun­ity for members of the public to comment on the project; engaging an external consultant to act as the fairness monitor for the project; provi­ding a public report on the result of the project; and ensuring there is no conflict of interest.

      Our gov­ern­ment is committed to ensuring that public sector assets are always owned by the Manitobans.

      Thank you, Hon­our­able Speaker.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

      Before I recog­nize the minister, I'd just remind all people, when they're intro­ducing a bill, the intro­ductory passage is supposed to be somewhere in the neighbourhood of 30 seconds, not a minute and 30 seconds. So please try and keep within that range. I'm a little bit lax in enforcing it, but try and keep it there.

Bill 26–The Vital Statistics Amendment Act

Hon. Mintu Sandhu (Minister of Public Service Delivery): I move, seconded by the Minister of Trans­por­tation and Infra­structure (MLA Naylor), that Bill 26, The Vital Statistics Amend­ment Act, be now read for the first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Sandhu: The Vital Statistics Act is being amended to remove the need for a supporting letter from a health‑care pro­fes­sional for applicants age 18 years and older who want to change their sex designation.

      The bill represents our gov­ern­ment's commit­ment to support rights of gender‑diverse persons and to ad­vocate for the rights of self‑expression and identifica­tion for all Manitobans.

      Thank you, Hon­our­able Speaker.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 31–The Property Controls for Grocery Stores and Supermarkets Act
(Various Acts Amended)

Hon. Mintu Sandhu (Minister of Public Service Delivery): I move, seconded by the Minister of Environ­ment and Climate Change (MLA Moyes), that Bill 31, The Property Controls for Grocery Stores and Supermarkets Act (Various Acts Amended), be now read for the first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Sandhu: Our gov­ern­ment promised to elimi­nate restrictive covenants that drive up grocery prices.

      This bill amends The Law of Property Act, Real Property Act and Munici­pal Board Act to stop the use of property control in owner­ship and leasing agree­ments so more locations are available for the grocery store and supermarket to sell fresh food and groceries. More competition in the grocery industry is accepted to increase access to food for sale and make life more affordable for all Manitobans.

      Thank you, Hon­our­able Speaker.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 206–The Homeowner Pro­tec­tion from Unsolicited Purchase Offers Act

Mr. Mark Wasyliw (Fort Garry): I moved, seconded by the member for Tyndall Park (MLA Lamoureux), that Bill 206, The Homeowner Pro­tec­tion from Unsolicited Purchase Offers Act; Loi sur la protection des propriétaires contre les offres d'achat non sollicitées, be now read a first time.

Motion presented.

Mr. Wasyliw: I'm pleased to reintroduce The Homeowner Pro­tec­tion from Unsolicited Purchase Offers Act, which strengthens pro­tec­tions for Manitoban home­owners by curbing aggressive real estate wholesaling practices that target vul­ner­able individuals.

      This bill introduces clear, enforceable safeguards to protect homeowners. It establishes an opt‑out registry, allowing homeowners to refuse unsolicited offers altogether. It mandates full disclosure of home­owner rights in sale con­di­tions, ensuring trans­par­ency in the process. It also requires homeowners to be represented by licensed realtors at the buyers' expense so that they receive pro­fes­sional guidance before making any decisions. Finally, it grants homeowners a 30‑day cooling-off period, allowing them to reverse any sale without penalty.

      And I look forward to the passage of this bill.

      Thank you.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 17–The Public Schools Amendment Act
(Nutrition Equality for Lasting Learning Outcomes)

Hon. Tracy Schmidt (Minister of Education and Early Childhood Learning): I move, seconded by the Minister of Advanced Edu­ca­tion and Training (MLA Cable), that Bill 17, The Public Schools Amend­ment Act (Nutrition Equality for Lasting Learning Out­comes); Loi modifiant la Loi sur les écoles publiques (équité alimentaire pour un apprentissage durable), now be read for a first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Schmidt: Hon­our­able Speaker, I am pleased to intro­duce Bill 17, The Public Schools Amend­ment Act (nutritional equality for lasting learning out­comes), or Nello's law.

      This bill builds off our historic uni­ver­sal nutrition program by amending The Public Schools Act to ensure nutrition programs are offered in all schools and to ensure the programs in each school are tailored to meet the specific needs of the school com­mu­nity.

      This bill will also protect the uni­ver­sal nutrition program from any future gov­ern­ment that may not see the value in feeding our own hungry kids, as it stipulates that Cabinet members will be subject to a 20 per cent cut in min­is­terial salary if a bill is passed to reduce or repeal Nello's law, the uni­ver­sal nutrition program.

      Every child matters.

      Thank you, merci, miigwech.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 18–The Public Schools Amendment Act
(Indigenous Languages of Instruction)

Hon. Tracy Schmidt (Minister of Education and Early Childhood Learning): Thank you, hon­our­able Minister.

      I move, seconded by the Minister of Advanced Edu­ca­tion and Training, that Bill 18, The Public Schools Amend­ment Act (Indigenous Languages of Instruction); Loi modifiant la Loi sur les écoles publiques (enseignement en langue autochtone), be now read for a first time.

Motion presented.

* (13:50)

MLA Schmidt: I'm pleased to intro­duce Bill 18, The Public Schools Amend­ment Act. Currently, The Public Schools Act only allows for French and English to be taught as the primary languages of instruction, meaning other languages cannot be taught for over 50 per cent of the school day.

      This bill amends The Public Schools Act to allow for Indigenous languages, including Cree, Dakota, Dene, Inuktitut, Michif, Ojibwe and Ojibwe‑Cree to be used as a primary instructional language.

      Amending the PSA to allow for the creation of Indigenous‑language-immersion programs is one way that our gov­ern­ment is taking action to preserve and revitalize Indigenous languages and helps us on our way to meeting the Truth and Recon­ciliation Com­mis­sion's Call to Action No. 14.

      Every child matters.

      Thank you, merci, miigwech.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 19–The Public Schools Amendment Act
(Safe Schools)

Hon. Tracy Schmidt (Minister of Education and Early Childhood Learning): I move, seconded by the minister of busi­ness, jobs, trade–busi­ness, jobs, trade, mining–no, job creation–you got it–that Bill 19, The Public Schools Amend­ment Act (Safe Schools); Loi modifiant la Loi sur les écoles publiques (milieu scolaire sûr), now be read for a first time.

The Speaker: Short min­is­terial names are a good thing.

      It has been moved by the hon­our­able Minister of Edu­ca­tion and Early Child­hood Learning, seconded by the hon­our­able Minister of Busi­ness, Mining, Trade and Job Creation (Mr. Moses), that Bill 19, The Public Schools Amend­ment Act (Safe Schools), be now read a first time.

MLA Schmidt: I'm pleased to intro­duce Bill 19, The Public Schools Amend­ment Act, or Safe Schools. This bill amends The Public Schools Act to enshrine in legis­lation require­ments for all divisional staff, volunteers and coaches to complete approved sexual abuse pre­ven­tion training programs. This bill com­plements a bill brought forward by the Minister of Sport, Culture, Heritage and Tourism (MLA Kennedy) that aims to address abuse in non-school sports.

      Together, these two bills will enhance the pro­tec­tion of children by creating training, policy and infor­ma­tion dissemination require­ments for individuals working directly with children in sports and in other volunteer capacities.

      Every child matters.

      Thank you, merci, miigwech.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 20–The Community Child Care Standards Amendment and Edu­ca­tion Administration Amendment Act

Hon. Tracy Schmidt (Minister of Education and Early Childhood Learning): I move, seconded by the Minister of Advanced Edu­ca­tion and Training (MLA Cable), that Bill 20, The Com­mu­nity Child Care Standards Amend­ment and Edu­ca­tion Administration Amend­ment Act; Loi modifiant la Loi sur la garde d'enfants et la Loi sur l'administration scolaire, be now read a first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Schmidt: I'm pleased to intro­duce Bill 20, The Com­mu­nity Child Care Standards Amend­ment and Edu­ca­tion Administration Amend­ment Act. This bill requires the de­part­ment to esta­blish a First Nations, Inuit and Métis policy framework for both the K‑to‑12 and the early-child­hood-learning sectors.

      First Nations, Inuit and Métis policy frameworks will ensure all Manitoba children are edu­ca­ted about colonial history, treaties and the con­tri­bu­tions of First Nations, Inuit and Métis people and the path to truth and recon­ciliation.

      The intro­duction of this bill demonstrates our gov­ern­ment's commit­ment to advancing the TRC's edu­ca­tion-related Calls to Action.

      Every child matters.

      Thank you, merci, miigwech.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 40– An Act respecting "O Canada" and Other Observances and Land and Treaty Acknowledgements in Schools
(Education Administration Act and Public Schools Act Amended)

Hon. Tracy Schmidt (Minister of Education and Early Childhood Learning): I move, seconded by the Minister of Advanced Edu­ca­tion and Training, that Bill 40, An Act Respecting "O Canada" and Other Observances and Land and Treaty Acknowledgements in Schools (Edu­ca­tion Administration Act and Public Schools Act Amended); Loi sur les activités scolaires soulignant notamment l'« Ô Canada » et la reconnaissance des territoires et des traités (modification de la Loi sur l'administration scolaire et de la Loi sur les écoles publiques), now be read for the first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Schmidt: I'm pleased to intro­duce Bill 40, An Act respecting "O Canada" and Other Observances and Land and Treaty Acknowledgements in Schools (Edu­ca­tion Administration Act and Public Schools Act Amended).

      This bill amends The Public Schools Act to remove provisions respecting religious exercises that were found un­con­stitu­tional by the Court of King's Bench in 1992. Previous require­ments regarding play­ing God Save the King have not been continued in practice and will no longer be reflected in Manitoba's edu­ca­tion statutes or required in public schools. Consistent with common practice, this bill also introduces a require­ment that school boards esta­blish and implement a written policy respecting land acknow­ledge­ments and treaty acknowledgements.

      Every child matters.

      Thank you, merci, miigwech.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 39–The Public Schools Amendment Act
(Campaign Financing for School Trustees)

Hon. Tracy Schmidt (Minister of Education and Early Childhood Learning): I move, seconded by the Minister of Environ­ment and Climate Change (MLA Moyes), that Bill 39, The Public Schools Amend­ment Act (Campaign Financing for School Trustees); Loi modifiant la loi sur les écoles publiques (financement des campagnes électorales pour les élections scolaires), now be read a first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Schmidt: I'm pleased to intro­duce Bill 39, The Public Schools Amend­ment Act (Campaign Financing for School Trustees). This bill establishes campaign financing rules for school trustee candidates, in­cluding con­tri­bu­tion limits, public reporting require­ments and limiting con­tri­bu­tions to individuals who reside in Manitoba.

      These changes will align Manitoba with other juris­dic­tions in Canada and strengthen our elections to protect them from third party and foreign inter­ference.

      Thank you, merci, miigwech.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 21–The Protecting Youth in Sports Act

Hon. Nellie Kennedy (Minister of Sport, Culture, Heritage and Tourism): Hon­our­able Speaker, I move, seconded by the Minister for Advanced Edu­ca­tion and Training (MLA Cable), that Bill 21, The Protecting Youth in Sports Act, be now read for a first time.

The Speaker: It's been moved by the hon­our­able minister of sports–no–the hon­our­able Minister of Sport, Culture, Heritage and Tourism, that Bill 21, The Protecting Youth in Sports Act, be now read a first time.

MLA Kennedy: I am pleased to be here today to intro­duce Bill 21, The Protecting Youth in Sports Act. The bill requires sports organi­zations to adopt, main­tain and apply safe sport policies and training for all. In addition, it establishes a third party review and disciplinary mechanism for any complaints of mal­treatment against a young athlete.

      This bill furthers our gov­ern­ment's commit­ment to a safe and equitable sport system free from racism where every child knows they have the right to play.

      Thank you, Hon­our­able Speaker.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 22–The Environment Amendment and Waste Reduction and Prevention Amendment Act

Hon. Mike Moyes (Minister of Environment and Climate Change): Hon­our­able Speaker, I move, seconded by the Minister of Transportation and Infra­structure (MLA Naylor), that Bill 22, the environ­mental amend­ment and waste reduction and pre­ven­tion amend­ment act, be now read a first time.

The Speaker: Moved by the hon­our­able Minister of Environ­ment and Climate Change, seconded by the hon­our­able Minister of Trans­por­tation and Infra­structure, that Bill 22, The Environ­ment Amend­ment and Waste Reduction and Pre­ven­tion Amend­ment Act, be now read a first time.

MLA Moyes: Hon­our­able Speaker, I'm pleased to intro­duce Bill 22, which brings forward several im­por­tant amend­ments to The Environ­ment Act and The Waste Reduction and Pre­ven­tion Act to strengthen environ­mental pro­tec­tions in Manitoba.

      The first amend­ment that I would like to high­light is the strengthening of The Environ­ment Act to ensure environ­ment officers across Manitoba can prevent environ­mental damage and ensure that polluters are held accountable by reducing the threshold of adverse effects from pollution that are required to prosecute offenders. This aligns Manitoba with best practices in environ­mental pro­tec­tion.

      This bill also introduces enhanced reporting and notification obligations to The Environ­ment Act in the event a pollutant is released or there's an imminent risk of release.

* (14:00)

      The bill also amends The Waste Reduction and Pre­ven­tion Act to consolidate the semi-annual waste reduction and recycling support levy into a single annual payment. This will reduce the admin­is­tra­tive burden for landfill owners, mainly munici­palities, and improve the efficiency of gov­ern­ment.

       I'm pleased to intro­duce this bill to the House for its con­sid­era­tion.

      Thank you, merci, miigwech.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

      The hon­our­able Minister of Finance (MLA Sala)–oops, sorry, the hon­our­able Minister of Justice (Mr. Wiebe).

Bill 13–The Minor Amend­ments and Corrections Act, 2025

Hon. Matt Wiebe (Minister of Justice and Attorney General): I move, seconded by the Minister of Families (MLA Fontaine), that Bill 13, the minor amend­ments and corrections act, be now read a first time.

The Speaker: Shortest one all day and I got it wrong.

      It's been moved by the hon­our­able Minister of Justice, seconded by the hon­our­able Minister of Families (MLA Fontaine), that Bill 13, The Minor Amend­ments and Corrections Act, 2025, be now read a first time.

Mr. Wiebe: Hon­our­able Speaker, it's my pleasure to intro­duce The Minor Amend­ments and Corrections Act, 2025. This is an annual omnibus bill that corrects translation, typographical and numbering errors. It also makes other minor amend­ments to statutes, all of which aim to provide clarity and consistency in Manitoba's statute book.

      I look forward to being able to provide more infor­ma­tion on the importance of this bill at second reading.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 23–The Public Interest Expression Defence Act

Hon. Matt Wiebe (Minister of Justice and Attorney General): I move, seconded by the Minister of Families (MLA Fontaine), that Bill 23, The Public Interest Expression Defence Act, be now read a first time.

Motion presented.

Mr. Wiebe: Hon­our­able Speaker, I'm pleased to intro­­duce this bill to the Legislature, esta­blish­ing anti‑SLAPP legis­lation in Manitoba.

      A SLAPP, or a strategic lawsuit against public partici­pation, can be used as a mechanism to silence or deter partici­pation on debates of issues of public interest. This bill ensures a defendant may bring a motion to dismiss the suit on the grounds the pro­ceeding originates from a com­muni­cation made by the defendant on a matter of public interest.

      These lawsuits are often used to intimidate and suppress the rights of citizens to speak out, and this bill will safeguard their ability to engage in open debates, hold powerful entities accountable and pro­mote trans­par­ency.

      I'm pleased to intro­duce this bill for–to the House for its con­sid­era­tion.

      Thank you, Hon­our­able Speaker.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 32–The Residential Tenancies Amendment Act
(Measures to Address Unlawful Activities)

Hon. Matt Wiebe (Minister of Justice and Attorney General): I move, seconded by the Minister respon­si­ble for Public Service Delivery, that Bill 32, The Resi­den­tial Tenancies Amend­ment Act, be now read a first time.

The Speaker: It's been moved by the hon­our­able Minister of Justice, seconded by the hon­our­able Minister of Public Service Delivery (MLA Sandhu), that Bill 32, The Resi­den­tial Tenancies Amend­ment Act (Measures to Address Unlawful Activities), be now read for a first time.

Mr. Wiebe: Hon­our­able Speaker, this bill amends The Resi­den­tial Tenancies Act and the safer com­mu­nities and neighbours act to stream­line the process for evicting tenants who are engaged in drug or human trafficking.

      The proposed amend­ments will broaden the threshold needed for a five-day eviction from imme­diate risk to, quote, sig­ni­fi­cant risk. This–these amend­­ments will also clarify that drug and human trafficking are automatically deemed sig­ni­fi­cant risks.

      Bill 32 will outline the type of infor­ma­tion that the Resi­den­tial Tenancies Branch may consider when deter­mining whether to grant an order of possession, due to unlawful activity by the tenant, and finally, Bill 32 clarifies that investigators from the Public Safety In­vesti­gations unit can present evidence as part of a Resi­den­tial Tenancies Act proceeding regarding the unlawful activity by a tenant.

      Hon­our­able Speaker, I'm pleased to intro­duce this bill, and I look forward to its con­sid­era­tion.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 35–The Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation Amendment Act

Hon. Matt Wiebe (Minister of Justice and Attorney General): I move, seconded by the Minister for Trans­por­tation and Infra­structure, that Bill 35, The Manitoba Public Insurance Cor­por­ation Amend­ment Act, be now read a first time.

Motion presented.

Mr. Wiebe: Currently, MPI's fleet insurance model can only offer surcharges and rebates at year end for its fleet customers. This bill will give MPI the legal author­ity to offer discounts instead of rebates in the fleet insurance model. This will also apply to blanket policies once those become available in the future. I look forward to con­sid­era­tion by the House.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 36–The Drivers and Vehicles Amendment and Highway Traffic Amendment Act

Hon. Matt Wiebe (Minister of Justice and Attorney General): I move, seconded by the Minister for Trans­por­tation and Infra­structure, that Bill 36, The Drivers and Vehicles Amend­ment and Highway Traffic Amend­ment Act, be now read a first time.

Motion presented.

Mr. Wiebe: This legis­lation makes several im­prove­ments with respect to MPI's services and road safety. It will enable MPI to bring charges against vehicle inspection stations that are involved in fraudulent inspections. It will expand the types of infor­ma­tion that can be disclosed by an online tool, which MPI is building for stake­holders to check the validity of a driver's licence. And it clarifies several other pro­visions and repeals obsolete require­ments related to driver licensing and suspensions. I look forward to con­sid­era­tion by the House.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 30–The Election Financing Amend­ment and Elections Amendment Act

Hon. Matt Wiebe (Minister of Justice and Attorney General): I move, seconded by the Minister of Families (MLA Fontaine), that Bill 30, the election financing amend­ment act and elections amend­ment act, be now read a first time.

The Speaker: It's been moved by the hon­our­able Minister of Justice, seconded by the hon­our­able Minister of Families, that Bill 30, The Election Financing Amend­ment and Elections Amend­ment Act, be now read a first time.

Mr. Wiebe: I'm pleased to intro­duce Bill 30. This bill will hold all political parties to a high standard of ethical campaigning, which is paramount to a healthy demo­cracy. It will make it easier and more accessible for Manitobans to vote in advance, giving voters the freedom to choose and a guarantee that they will be able to vote.

      It will protect the integrity of our elections by intro­ducing offence provisions around false state­ments and impersonations. It will also intro­duce prohibitions on using deepfakes to under­mine public con­fi­dence in our elections, and it will take big money out of politics.

      These changes will protect our election processes, our demo­cracy and our province, which is critical in an age where demo­cracy faces growing threats. I'm pleased to intro­duce this bill to the House for its con­sid­era­tion.

      Thank you, Hon­our­able Speaker.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 24–The Workers Compensation Amendment Act

Hon. Malaya Marcelino (Minister of Labour and Immigration): I move, seconded by the Minister of Justice, that Bill 24, The Workers Compensation Amend­ment Act; Loi modifiant la Loi sur les accidents du travail, be now read a first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Marcelino: The purpose of this bill is to intro­duce a fairer approach to workers compensation death benefit payments that recognizes the growing diver­sity of family units and relationships, better balanced WCB decision making to give the benefit of the doubt to injured workers when evidence is evenly balanced and align the act's annual reporting deadlines.

      I am pleased to present this bill to the House for its con­sid­era­tion.

      Thank you, Hon­our­able Speaker.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 29–The Workplace Safety and Health Amendment Act

Hon. Malaya Marcelino (Minister of Labour and Immigration): I move, seconded by the Minister of Justice (Mr. Wiebe), that Bill 29, The Work­place Safety and Health Amend­ment Act; Loi modifiant la Loi sur la sécurité et l'hygiène du travail, be now read a first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Marcelino: Hon­our­able Speaker, this bill ad­dresses recom­men­dations from The Work­place Safety and Health Act stake­holder review com­mit­tee, in­cluding psychological safety, ensuring bad actors could be held more accountable, intro­ducing a mechanism for collecting wages, order to be paid and provi­ding a new penalty for failing to report serious incidents in the work­place and ensuring that monitoring is in place if workers are overexposed to a hazardous substance at work.

* (14:10)

      I am pleased to present this bill to the House for its con­sid­era­tion.

      Thank you, Hon­our­able Speaker.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 33–The Public Health Amendment Act

Hon. Uzoma Asagwara (Minister of Health, Seniors and Long-Term Care): I move, seconded by the Minister of Justice (Mr. Wiebe), that Bill 33, The Public Health Amend­ment Act; Loi modifiant la Loi sur la santé publique, be now read a first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Asagwara: Hon­our­able Speaker, I'm pleased to intro­duce Bill 33, The Public Health Amend­ment Act. This bill will ensure that persons who require treatment for a highly infectious disease in order to protect the public under the provisions of The Public Health Act s are not detained in correctional facilities. It will also set out that a court order to detain a person for treatment must now be made by a judge of the Prov­incial Court rather than the Justice of the Peace.

      Thank you.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 41–The Reporting of Supports for Child Survivors of Sexual Assault (Trained Health Professionals and Evidence Collection Kits) Amendment Act

Hon. Uzoma Asagwara (Minister of Health, Seniors and Long-Term Care): Hon­our­able Speaker, I move, seconded by the MLA for The Pas-Kameesak, that Bill 41, The Reporting of Supports for Child Survivors of Sexual Assault (Trained Health Pro­fes­sionals and Evidence Collection Kits) Amend­ment Act; Loi modifiant la Loi sur la pré­sen­ta­tion de rapports concernant les mesures de soutien destiné aux enfants survivants d'agression sexuelle (pro­fes­sionels de la santé formés et trousses médicolégales), be now read a first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Asagwara: Hon­our­able Speaker, I'm pleased to intro­duce Bill 41, The Reporting of Supports for Child Survivors of Sexual Assault (Trained Health Pro­fes­sionals and Evidence Collection Kits Amend­ment Act). This bill will require the minister to report to the Assembly annually on the number of children under the age of 15 that are assessed by spe­cific­ally trained health pro­fes­sionals instead of reporting the inventory numbers of sexual assault evidence kits.

      The title of the act will also be changed to report­ing supports for sexual–reporting of supports for child survivors of sexual assault act (trained health pro­fes­sionals and patient assessments).

      I'd like to recog­nize the member for The Pas-Kameesak (Ms. Lathlin) for her work in creating this im­por­tant bill and thank her for her tireless efforts to protect children, especially in northern Manitoba.

      Thank you.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 34–The Highway Traffic Amendment Act
(Motor Carrier Enforcement)

Hon. Lisa Naylor (Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure): I move, seconded by the Minister of Justice (Mr. Wiebe), that Bill 34, The Highway Traffic Amend­ment Act (Motor Carrier En­force­ment), be now read a first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Naylor: I am pleased to intro­duce Bill 34, The Highway Traffic Amend­ment Act (Motor Carrier Enforce­ment). This bill amends The Highway Traffic Act to improve oversight of heavy com­mercial vehicle operators and improve the pro­tec­tion of motor carrier en­force­ment officers while carrying out their duties.

      The bill clarifies administrative monetary penal­ties and amends collision reporting require­ments for property‑damage‑only incidents for heavy com­mercial vehicles. This bill continues our gov­ern­ment's commit­­ment to keeping people safe when travelling on Manitoba roads while also protecting Manitoba's infra­structure.

      I look forward to further discussion in the House as the bill progresses through all stages.

      Thank you, Hon­our­able Speaker.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Bill 38–The Highway Traffic Amendment Act
(Traffic Safety Measures)

Hon. Lisa Naylor (Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure): I move, seconded by the Minister of Justice (Mr. Wiebe), that Bill 38, The Highway Traffic Amend­ment Act (Traffic Safety Measures), be now read a first time.

Motion presented.

MLA Naylor: I am pleased to intro­duce Bill 38, The Highway Traffic Amend­ment Act (Traffic Safety Measures). This bill amends The Highway Traffic Act to increase the safety of all road users. It enables tow truck drivers to create safe work zones and clarifies for drivers when it is safe to pass snowplows and cyclists. This bill supports gov­ern­ment's commit­ment to safety. All Manitobans should return home at night regardless of the vehicle they are operating or what job they are doing.

      I look forward to further discussion in the House as this bill progresses through all stages.

      Thank you, Hon­our­able Speaker.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

      Any further intro­duction of bills?

      Seeing none, we'll move on to com­mit­tee reports.

Committee Reports

Standing Committee on Public Accounts


Second Report

Mr. Josh Guenter (Chairperson): Hon­our­able Speaker, I wish to present the second report of the Standing Com­mit­tee on Public Accounts.

Clerk (Mr. Rick Yarish): Your Standing Com­mit­tee on–

An Honourable Member: Dispense.

The Speaker: Dispense.

Your Standing Committee on Public Accounts presents the following as its Second Report.

Meetings

Your Committee met on March 5, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. in the Chamber of the Legislative Building.

Matters under Consideration

·         Auditor General's Report – eChart Manitoba dated October 2018

·         Auditor General's Report – Forensic Audits dated October 2018

o    Pharmacare: Special Audit of Financial Irregularities and Controls

·         Auditor General's Report – Main Street Project Investigation dated June 2021

·         Auditor General's Report – Follow-up of Recommendations dated March 2020

o    eChart Manitoba

o    Pharmacare: Special Audit of Financial Irregularities and Controls

·         Auditor General's Report – Follow-Up of Previously Issued Audit Recommendations dated March 2021

o    eChart Manitoba

o    Pharmacare: Special Audit of Financial Irregularities and Controls

·         Auditor General's Report – Follow-Up of Previously Issued Audit Recommendations dated April 2022

o    eChart Manitoba

o    Pharmacare: Special Audit of Financial Irregularities and Controls

·         Auditor General's Report – Follow Up of Previously Issued Recommendations dated February 2024

o    Main Street Project Investigation

Committee Membership

·         Mr. Brar

·         MLA Chen

·         MLA Compton

·         MLA Dela Cruz

·         MLA Devgan

·         Mr. Guenter (Chairperson)

·         MLA Lamoureux

·         MLA Maloway (Vice-Chairperson)

·         Mr. Nesbitt

·         Mr. Oxenham

·         Mrs. Stone

Substitutions received prior to Committee proceedings:

·         Mr. Blashko for MLA Dela Cruz

Officials Speaking on Record

·         Tyson Shtykalo, Auditor General of Manitoba

·         Scott Sinclair, Deputy Minister of Health, Seniors and Long-Term Care

·         Chris Christodoulou, Interim Chief Executive Officer, Shared Health

·         Christine Pawlett, Executive Director, Clinical Digital Solutions, Digital Shared Services, Shared Health

Reports Considered and Passed

Your Committee considered and passed the following report as presented:

·         Auditor General's Report – eChart Manitoba dated October 2018

Your Committee completed consideration of the following report as presented:

·         Auditor General's Report – Main Street Project Investigation dated June 2021

Your Committee completed consideration of the following chapters as presented:

·         Auditor General's Report – Forensic Audits dated October 2018

o    Pharmacare: Special Audit of Financial Irregularities and Controls

·         Auditor General's Report – Follow-up of Recommendations dated March 2020

o    eChart Manitoba

o    Pharmacare: Special Audit of Financial Irregularities and Controls

·         Auditor General's Report – Follow-Up of Previously Issued Audit Recommendations dated March 2021

o    eChart Manitoba

o    Pharmacare: Special Audit of Financial Irregularities and Controls

·         Auditor General's Report – Follow-Up of Previously Issued Audit Recommendations dated April 2022

o    eChart Manitoba

o    Pharmacare: Special Audit of Financial Irregularities and Controls

·         Auditor General's Report – Follow Up of Previously Issued Recommendations dated February 2024

o    Main Street Project In­vesti­gation

Mr. Guenter: Hon­our­able Speaker, I move, seconded by the hon­our­able member for Lakeside (Mr. King), that the report of the com­mit­tee be received.

Motion agreed to.

The Speaker: Tabling of reports.

Ministerial Statements

Inter­national Women's Day

Hon. Nahanni Fontaine (Minister of Families): For generations, politics has been the domain of men. In Canada's House of Commons, only 103 out of 338 seats are currently held by women or gender‑diverse peoples. In 151 years, the city of Winnipeg has seen 456 men elected as mayor or city councillors. Only 33 have held council seats, and just one woman has ever been elected as mayor. Since 1870, our own Manitoba Legislative Assembly has seen the election of 801 men, 77 women, one nine–non‑binary person and one trans man.

      In 2025, all of these stats aren't great. This isn't because we aren't adept or accomplished or savvy or skilled or capable. It's because, historically, these very systems and spaces have been constructed to keep us out. But now, more than ever, we need women and gender‑diverse peoples to run for office, to take their rightful place at decision-making tables.

      This isn't just about representation. It's about ensuring our rights, our bodies and our futures are not dictated by men who would seek to control us. We need our voices in legislative chambers, city halls, parliaments and now, more than ever, in both the US Congress and Senate–voices that will stand up for reproductive rights, for gender equality, for trans rights, for justice and as a reckoning force against fascism and oligarchy.

* (14:20)

      And if you are thinking, I'm not qualified, I could never run, I ask you to consider this: Since I was first elected in 2016, Manitoba PC caucus members, pre­domi­nantly men, have denied abortion rights, with many of them not even capable of saying the word abortion. They've embraced anti‑vaxxers, stood in this House voting against the rights of two‑spirited and trans Manitobans, legis­lated away the rights of Indigenous children and are presently courting the leadership of the member for Fort Whyte (Mr. Khan), who proudly led an attack on trans children–on chil­dren, and my personal favourite, campaigned on the murders of Indigenous women.

      Every day, we see more regressive and oppressive laws coming out of the US, some of them calling for the literal death of women who access abortion or, as of a couple of weeks ago, women who miscarry. The literal state‑sponsored murder of women or gender‑diverse folks who access health care. Make it make sense.

      So I'm not calling for an election of women as ardent, faithful foot-soldiers of patriarchy, standing silently in collusion beside their male colleagues as our rights are stripped away from us. We need leaders, fierce, bold and unapologetic, who will fight for what's right.

      Right now, patriarchy is fighting for its very life. It would have us believe that we are powerless and that we should just give up and shut up, but we cannot. I will not. We must not.

      So my message for this Inter­national Women's Day: We must run, we must win and we must lead. Because when women do, women change the world.

      As Black‑American writer, intersectional feminist and civil rights activist Audre Lorde expressed, and I quote: I am not free while any woman is unfree, even if her shackles are very different from my own. End quote.

      I wish all women here in Manitoba and Canada, but especially women in the US, a happy Inter­national Women's Day.

      Miigwech.

Ms. Jodie Byram (Agassiz): Today, I rise to recog­nize and celebrate Inter­national Women's Day, a day dedicated to recognizing the achievements of women, raising awareness about ongoing discrimination and taking action to forge a future of gender parity. This year's theme, Accelerate Action, serves as a powerful reminder that while progress has been made, there is still much work to be done.

      The world that we want to live in is a world free of bias, stereotypes and discrimination, one that is diverse, equitable and inclusive, where difference is valued and celebrated. Together, we can make this vision a reality.

      Since its inception in 1911, International Women's Day has belonged to all of those who care about gender equality, and today, we affirm our commit­ment to this cause.

      To be on a track of Accelerate Action means to be taking swift and decisive steps to breaking down systemic barriers that hinder women's advancement. It means actively supporting women's economic empowerment, increasing opportunities in leadership and decision making, expanding access to quality education and training and ensuring women and girls have the resources they need to thrive in business, STEM, sports and the arts. These actions are not just about fairness. They drive innovation, support economic growth and build a sustainable future for all.

      As we reflect on history, we must acknowledge the trailblazers who have paved the way. Manitoba holds a special place in Canada's journey toward gender equality. It was here that women, led by Nellie McClung and the Political Equality League, first gained the right to vote in provincial elections. Their courage and determination were the catalyst for change, making it possible for those who are disenfranchised and excluded to be heard loudly from outside the halls that had long ignored their voices.

      Indeed, gender equality is not the respon­si­bility of women alone; it is a collective effort that requires all of us to take meaningful action.

      Let us use this day as a day to call to action. Let us accelerate our efforts to dismantle barriers, to sup­port and uplift women in all fields and to create a world where gender does not deter­mine one's op­por­tun­ities or successes. Together we can forge a future where equality is not just an aspiration but a reality.

      To the young women and girls of Manitoba: your dreams matter. Your potential is limitless. You stand on the shoulders of trailblazers who fought for change and now it's your turn to shape the future. Believe in yourself. Embrace your strengths. Cultivate and feed your ambitions.

      While barriers may have a say in how you get there, they do not have to define where or when you arrive. The world needs your ideas, your leadership and your passion. Keep pushing forward because your future is bright and we are cheering for you every step of the way.

      Happy Inter­national Women's Day.

Members' Statements

World Lymphedema Day

Mrs. Rachelle Schott (Kildonan-River East): Today is World Lymphedema Day, a day for spreading awareness and increasing edu­ca­tion on lymphatic diseases. Lymphedema is the buildup of fluid in the body's tissues, leading to swelling and decreased mobility. Those with lymphedema face a lifelong battle with the disease as there is currently no cure, but it can be managed if caught in time.

      Diagnosis and early treatment are key, which is why raising awareness is so im­por­tant for those at risk of developing the disease as well as for health‑care pro­fes­sionals. In fall of 2023, shortly after the election, I attended an event hosted by Lymphedema Association of Manitoba, otherwise known as LAM, on behalf of the Premier (Mr. Kinew) and Minister of Health.

      Our Health Minister and I have met with members of LAM executive, and our NDP gov­ern­ment is working closely with LAM. Our NDP gov­ern­ment remains committed to working with LAM. LAM is a non‑profit organi­zation dedi­cated to spreading aware­ness and provi­ding edu­ca­tion on lymphedema aware­ness here in Manitoba. Their support for those at risk of developing lymphedema and those living with the disease is invaluable.

      With a patient‑first approach, the organi­zation has tirelessly advocated for better access to lymphedema resources and services for those–more patients can get care that they need to manage this disease. Their commit­ment to improving the lives of those living with lymphedema is truly inspiring.

      Please join me in thanking the Lymphedema Association of Manitoba for their fierce advocacy. On World Lymphedema Day and every day, let's continue to support those living with lymphedema.

      Thank you.

Lymphedema Awareness Day

Mr. Wayne Ewasko (Leader of the Official Opposition): I am also pleased to rise today to recog­nize March 6 as Lymphedema Awareness Day right here in Manitoba. All members will know that Lymphedema Awareness Day was proclaimed in 2014 with unanimous consent in the Manitoba legislator, as private member's bill that I put forth declaring March 6 each year as Lymphedema Awareness Day.

      Eleven years later, bringing attention and aware­ness of lymphedema in Manitoba continues to be a high­light of mine and to those in the lymphedema com­mu­nity. The message remains the same each and every year, which is to bring public awareness and edu­ca­tion to this con­di­tion and the quality of life that affects thousands of Manitobans.

      Through ongoing edu­ca­tion, research and advocacy, there is strong support amongst those within and outside the lymphedema com­mu­nity to ensure that attention and change is at the forefront, not only on March 6, but through­out the year.

      Lymphedema affects over 250 million people world­wide. In Canada, it's esti­mated that 1.25 million are impacted by lymphedema. It is a lifelong medical con­di­tion caused by buildup of lymph fluids due to a faulty or damaged lymphatic system arising from genetic factors, surgery or accident. Common symptoms include swelling and pain to one's body and to date, there is no known cure, Hon­our­able Speaker.

      In Manitoba, as we celebrate Lymphedema Awareness Day, I am so proud and humbled by the ongoing work and dedi­cation of its staff and board members, volunteers and front-line workers to bring attention to lymphedema every day.

* (14:30)

      I'm also pleased to rise today to honour these individuals and the team at LAM. To founding directors of Lymphedema Association of Manitoba, Kim Avanthay, Edith Mulhall and Sue Zwarich, as well as current board members Nancy Roswell, Leona Waldner, Craig Harren and Rhonda Sietz. Thank you for the impact and change you bring to this very im­por­tant and ongoing work.

      Please join me in welcoming both Craig Harren and Iris Cogger, who are with us today in the gallery.

      Thank you, Hon­our­able Speaker.

Recog­nizing Women in Southdale Community

Hon. Renée Cable (Minister of Advanced Education and Training): Today, in honour of International Women's Day, I rise to recognize some of the many women who've left an indelible mark on our com­munity. When we explore the history of our neigh­bourhoods, it's evident that women played an integral role in shaping them.

      Back when Southdale and Windsor Park lacked some essential services, the Winakwa community club emerged as the heart of social life, providing a space where women could gather, support one another and foster a sense of community.

      Another notable example was the Cottonwood Beauty Salon. This shop was more than just a place to get a haircut; it was a hub where women could connect, share stories and support each other's ventures.

      One of our most beloved figures was Mrs. Weide, the Windsor Park librarian. We are joined in the gallery today by her daughter, Penny. Brenda Weide, a lifelong avid reader, dedicated 24 years to our local library. Her kindness, proper manners and unwavering dedication made her a pillar of our community. Her legacy lives on in the stories and fond memories shared by many, and to this day her children encounter people who remember Mrs. Weide from the library, or the lady with the English accent from the library. Brenda Weide retired in 1993 and passed away in 2013.

      We also remember Mrs. Fisher, a perennial volun­teer at the community centre, and Darlene Ringer, who served as convener for Tom Thumb hockey at Winakwa and president of the St. Boniface Warriors football club in the late 1970s. Darlene's outstanding volunteer work was recognized by both Football Manitoba and Football Canada. Her contributions were immense, from stitching name tags on uniforms to her many presidential duties.

      These are just a few of the women who were the backbone of Southdale and Windsor Park, and their legacies continue to inspire us. Today, and every day, let us celebrate the immense contributions of women everywhere.

Thank you.

I Love to Read Month

Mr. Ron Schuler (Springfield-Ritchot): Opening a new book for the first time always feels special, especially when we take the time to read with children and step into worlds beyond our own. As Dr. Seuss says: The more you read, the more things you will know. The more you learn, the more places you will go.

      This is the power of reading, and for decades, Manitoba com­mu­nities have celebrated this during I Love to Read Month. Each February, families, teachers and local leaders come together to share stories and support young readers. Books inspire creativity and nurture critical thinking through­out our lives. As another saying goes: first, we learn to read, and then we read to learn.

      We keep the I Love to Read tradition alive each year because many young Manitobans struggle with reading. National and inter­national assessments show us that they often fall behind their peers across Canada and the world. This is why it is more im­por­tant than ever to invest in reading edu­ca­tion and ensure students have the tools they need for personal growth and success. This starts at home, when families read together and encourage children to put down your phones and pick up a book instead.

      The benefits of reading are endless and as a proud parent and even prouder grandparent and a legislator, I have seen how reading changes lives.

      I encourage every Manitoba family to pick up a new book and read it with their children. The stories we share with them today will be the stories they share with others tomorrow.

      In fact, this year, I Love to Read month will spill over into March where, tomorrow, I still have the privilege to read to one of the smaller rural schools. Rest assured, although the school is small, the interaction will be epic.

      And with the final weeks of winter upon us, I also want to encourage Manitobans to get our, make the most of the rest of the season. Since December solstice, we have gained two and a half hours of daylight. As we approach the spring equinox, we will enjoy even more sun each day.

      Stay warm, soak up the sunshine and enjoy a good book.

Audrey Vail

MLA Carla Compton (Tuxedo): It is my absolute honour and joy to acknowledge an extraordinary Tuxedo constituent today, an amazing woman: Audrey Vail. Her life has the makings of a Hollywood movie.

      I cannot do her justice in two minutes, so I encourage you all to look up her documentary, titled Requestfully Yours.

      I do want to highlight a few pivotal moments that she has shared with me.

      First, Audrey had been–has been entertaining crowds since her childhood. One of her first public performances happened by chance at the 1937 New York World's Fair. She ended up separated from her parents and made her way onto a stage where she played piano in front of 1,000 people.

      (2) Years into her career, one night she was followed by a fan after her performance. She was assaulted by him. The next morning, she went to the police station. Audrey was told she had no case; she would not be helped because she was an entertainer. As a woman entertainer, she was asking for it. When asked how to protect herself, she was advised to carry oven cleaner.

      (3) At the age of 50, Audrey went back to school to become a registered nurse. She combined her passion for music and helping people and was an integral part of bringing the music therapy program to St. Boniface Hospital.

      Audrey loves a big audience, and she continues to perform to this day.

      And when asked if she had anything to share here, she gave me her favourite quote from Shakespeare's Twelfth Night: music be the food of love, play on.

      I feel fortunate to have met Audrey and learned her story. She is a strong, confident leader. She is a powerful woman, and she is joined today by her supportive husband, John Vail.

      And so please join me in celebrating Audrey Vail, also known as Requestfully Yours.

      Thank you.

* * *

Mr. Wayne Ewasko (Leader of the Official Opposition): On House busi­ness.

The Speaker: The hon­our­able Op­posi­tion House Leader, on House business

House Business

Mr. Derek Johnson (Official Opposition House Leader): Hon­our­able Speaker, 'pursurrant'–pursuant to rule 34(8), I'm announcing that the private member's reso­lu­tion to be considered on next Thursday of private members' busi­ness will be one put forward by the hon­our­able member for Midland (Mrs. Stone). The title of the reso­lu­tion is Provincial Gov­ern­ment Job‑Destroying Payroll Taxes.

The Speaker: It has been announced that pursuant to rule 34(8) that the private member's reso­lu­tion to be considered on the next Thursday of private members' busi­ness will be the one put forward by the hon­our­able member for Midland. The title of the reso­lu­tion is Prov­incial Gov­ern­ment Job‑Destroying Payroll Taxes.

Introduction of Guests

The Speaker: Before we move on to oral questions, there's some guests in the building I would like to intro­duce.

      First off, joining us in the loge to my right is–with us–joining us today, is Mr. Brent Blakley, who is a member of the Legis­lative Assembly of Saskatchewan repre­sen­ting the con­stit­uency of Regina Wascana Plains. Mr. Blakley is the guest of the hon­our­able member for Lagimodière (Mr. Blashko).

      We welcome you here today.

      Joining us in the public gallery, we have Carla Blakley. She is the Lutheran bishop of Ontario, Quebec, and the Atlantic Provinces.

      And we welcome you here today as well.

      And although these guests may have already been intro­duced, I'd like to reintroduce them and draw people's attention to the public gallery where we have with us today Audrey Vail, John Vail, Jennette Wright and Barend Otte, who are the guests of the hon­our­able member for Tuxedo (MLA Compton).

* (14:40)

      On behalf of all hon­our­able members, we welcome you here today.

Oral Questions

US Tariffs on Canadian Goods
Request for Gov­ern­ment Response

Mr. Wayne Ewasko (Leader of the Official Opposition): Hon­our­able Speaker, the Premier stated on numer­ous occasions that he's been preparing for 17 months for the Trump administration and his tariffs and anything else that President Trump was going to throw at him.

      Well, so far today, Hon­our­able Speaker, nada, zilch, nothing from this Premier and any action on any plan. Besides no Coors Light, 90-day deferral and wrapping himself in a Canadian flag, the Premier have so far kept details of Manitoba's potential plan to tariffs a secret.

      The Premier has promised to support busi­nesses and individuals hurt by tariffs but refuses to tell them how.

      Will the Premier table his plan to protect con­sumers and busi­nesses from tariffs today?

Hon. Wab Kinew (Premier): A reprieve until April 2 is not good enough. We cannot live as Manitobans with a persistent threat of Donald Trump's tariff tax, and so our countermeasures will remain.

      While Donald Trump might be trying to look for an off-ramp and talking about April 2, for the time being American booze will stay off the Liquor Mart shelves. We're standing up for Canada. We're standing up for Manitoba. At the same time, we're standing up for your jobs. And so the tax deferrals will also stay in place.

      We know that this is an im­por­tant time for us all to rally together around the flag. Well, almost all of us know that. While the other members on the op­posi­tion benches rally around somebody who said thank you to Donald Trump's tariffs, we are instead rallying around the Maple Leaf, and we're insisting that all threats of tariffs be dropped so that Canada can remain the true north, strong and free, a country we all love.

The Speaker: The honourable Leader of the Official Opposition, on a secondary question.

Manitoba Delegation to Washington

Mr. Ewasko: Once again, more fiction coming from this Premier, and it would really be good if the Premier, for a change, would answer some questions.

      Premier spent tens of thousands of dollars taking his entourage to Washington. He assured Manitobans that he would get–be getting a face-to-face time with President Trump to discuss tariffs and trade. Other than some TikTok clips, it appears the Premier accomplished little else in Washington. No meeting with the president, no meeting with Vice-President Vance. Local reports noted President Trump basically sent a couple of staffers to meet with our Premier.

      Within days of the Premier's hastily arranged meetings in Washington, Trump was imposing tariffs.

      What exactly did the Premier accomplish other than a few days away?

Mr. Kinew: You know, time was members opposite respected Doug Burgum. I seem to remember a former PC premier giving him the Order of the Buffalo Hunt. Seemed like that was a big deal at the time.

      Well, now that Mr. Burgum is a part of the Trump administration, I thought it was im­por­tant to take a meeting with him. We had a productive con­ver­sa­tion. We talked about baseload power, we talked about energy and we talked about working together across the Canada-US border.

      On the other side of the House, we have the captains of capitulation. They have a PC leadership race under way. One candidate full-throatedly endorsed Donald Trump in 2024, and the other candidate said thank you for the tariff threat.

      Now, it's very clear the PCs cannot be standed–cannot be trusted to stand up for Canada, but we are happy to come to work each and every single day. Today, a new act to buy Canadian.

      The question for the members opposite: You just left the gov­ern­ment benches. Why didn't you ever insist on supporting the Canadian economy by legislating that tax dollars get spent on buying–[interjection]

The Speaker: Member's time has expired.

      The honourable Leader of the Official Opposition, on a final sup­ple­mentary question.

Checkmate Gov­ern­ment Relations
Payments to Public Relations Firm

Mr. Wayne Ewasko (Leader of the Official Opposition): Again, Hon­our­able Speaker, no plan, no answers to the questions.

      The NDP barely spent anything to help promote Manitoba busi­nesses, Hon­our­able Speaker. We know Manitoba companies and entrepreneurs are the best in the world.

      But the Premier doesn't have the same con­fi­dence in Manitoba busi­nesses as we do. He failed to share with Manitobans that his gov­ern­ment is helping to pay a Trump-connected lobbying firm called Checkmate Gov­ern­ment Relations an eye-watering $120,000 a month to grease the wheels with key players to set up low-level meetings in Washington.

      NDP is spending more money on this Trump-connected lobbying firm than supporting Manitobans facing economic turmoil.

      Why is this Premier more interested in investing in Americans than the Manitobans who elected him?

Hon. Wab Kinew (Premier): When the budget comes through, the wonderful, amazing budget gets tabled in this very Chamber, you're going to see what our team is about. We're about building Manitoba. And here's the thing: when we build Manitoba, we buy Canadian every single step of the way.

      We're building hospitals, emergency rooms; we're building schools; we're building personal-care homes in his own con­stit­uency. The only thing that we're tearing down is interprov­incial trade barriers, thanks to our amazing Minister for Busi­ness, Mining, Trade and Job Creation.

      Now, while we're doing all these great things to bring Manitobans together, what are the members oppo­site doing? They're doubling down on division. I'm surprised that he didn't stand up today to begin his statements by apologizing to trans children for the divisive parental rights campaign of 2023.

The Speaker: The hon­our­able Leader of the Official Op­posi­tion on a new question.

Manitoba Trade Office in Washington
Gov­ern­ment Staffing Concerns

Mr. Wayne Ewasko (Leader of the Official Opposition): Hon­our­able Speaker, the question was on the Trump-connected lobbying firm, and of course the Premier is trying to distract from his failings.

      The Premier decided that our call for the esta­blish­ment of a permanent trade office in Washington to address the threats of Trump 2.0 was warranted. We ap­pre­ciate the Premier's endorsement, but remain con­cerned about the Premier's lack of faith in the skill set of Manitobans.

      Despite a popu­la­tion of almost 1.5 million people, including world-class entrepreneurs and busi­ness lead­ers, the Kinew gov­ern­ment has publicly said they are unwilling to hire local. Do as I say, not as I do has become the motto of this Kinew gov­ern­ment.

      Will the Premier commit today to hiring local for the promised trade office, or is he content with hiring another American?

Hon. Wab Kinew (Premier): Well, when we're talking about shopping local, we got the billboards up en­couraging Manitobans to do just that. When we want to talk about buying Canadian, we've got legis­lation ensuring that's going to happen.

      But here's the thing. I want everybody watching–because there's more people in the Chamber right now than are actually watching on YouTube–I want every­one here to pay attention. They closed the DC office. They cut it when they were in gov­ern­ment, and now he's trying to pretend as though it was their idea, when they only made the call after I announced it at the State of the Province address for the Winnipeg Chamber of Commerce.

      Here's the thing. I know it's tough times for the PCs when the chambers and the busi­ness councils and the CEOs all line up behind us to build Manitoba, and leave them flailing along with Trump sycophants and people that are still chasing the convoy from years ago. But here's the reality: the world has moved on from COVID. You need to get with the times and stand up with us against Donald Trump.

The Speaker: The hon­our­able Leader of the Official Op­posi­tion, on a secondary question.

Mr. Ewasko: Hon­our­able Speaker, and once again this afternoon, I hope everybody watching today in Manitoba is seeing the fact that the Premier continues to put misinformation on the record.

      Fact is, there was never, ever an office in the–in Washington for trade, and this Premier stands up, and just because he's yelling and getting applause from his members opposite, he thinks he's correct. Just another bullying tactic by this Premier, Hon­our­able Speaker.

      The only thing that we know for sure is that the Premier won't commit to hiring a Manitoban to represent Manitoba. Premier makes bold statements assuring Manitobans that, quote, if Trump is trying to take jobs out of our province, then we have to stand up for ourselves. End quote.

      Who has Manitobans' backs when it's not just President Trump trying to take jobs out of our pro­vince, but our very own Premier, Hon­our­able Speaker?

Mr. Kinew: Brian Pallister cut our presence in DC. It was there one day, then they went into Cabinet and it was gone the next. Poof, gone. Just like the aspirations of the member for Fort Whyte (Mr. Khan) to lead this province after he said thank you to Donald Trump.

* (14:50)

      And it was hilarious to see him run out and say that they needed to add context to those remarks. Here's the context–direct quote from the member of Fort Whyte: So how much of an influence did the 25 per cent tariff threat had on that–bad grammar is his, not mine–I would say a lot, and I would say thank you. I would say thank you. End quote.

      Now, here's the thing. When we look deeper at the context, what becomes clear is this: the member for Fort Whyte is saying thank you to a foreign power for subverting the properly demo­cratic­ally elected leader of our country. That is a betrayal of our demo­cracy and a betrayal of our country.

      If the PCs had a single conservative bone in their body, they would demand that he be bounced out of their leadership contest.

The Speaker: The honourable Leader of the Official Opposition, on a final sup­ple­mentary question.

Mr. Ewasko: Hon­our­able Speaker, it seems that the member for Fort Whyte is indeed living rent-free in the Premier's head. Premier said he wants to ban American companies from doing busi­ness in Manitoba. [interjection] I know that the Edu­ca­tion Minister wants to get up and say some­thing, I'm sure, but I wish that things would get under control here.

      He said he's going to restrict bids–beds from south of the border. Premier's publicly telling Manitobans to support local, but he's publicly telling Americans to not even bother applying for Manitoba jobs. But privately, he sends a cheque every month to an American Trump-backed lobbyist and refuses to hire a Manitoban to head his new trade office. The simplest way to show our American neighbours what Manitoba can do is to have a Manitoban do it.

      Why does the Premier refuse to show con­fi­dence in the skills of Manitobans and outsourcing gov­ern­ment right here in Manitoba, Hon­our­able Speaker?

Mr. Kinew: You know, they talk about outsourcing. They've outsourced every single original political idea south of the border. They just copy Donald Trump every single day.

      The only difference between the ones in the front bench and the ones in the back is that at least the member from Borderland is honest about the fact that he supports Donald Trump. Everyone else in there is, you know, cloak and dagger, still trying to pass some urban progressive cred.

      And, yes, they all live urbanly. They live in the con­stit­uencies of myself and the Minister of Health, every single one of them. Then, of course, the summer barbecue season comes around and oh, hey, we're here for rural Manitoba. No, not true, absolutely not.

      We reopen our rural emergency rooms, we fund rural school divisions and we stand up for rural jobs. So what are you waiting for, rural Manitoba? Send more MLAs to our caucus.

Dev­elop­ment of Manitoba's Natural Resources
Gov­ern­ment Position in the Wake of US Tariffs

Mrs. Lauren Stone (Midland): Hon­our­able Speaker, this Premier (Mr. Kinew) has shown he has no econo­mic response plan in the wake of tariffs. A photo op is not a plan. Stickers are not a plan. Advertising is not a plan.

      Despite Trump's delays today, things are still uncertain for Manitobans. Manitoba busi­nesses know that these economic attacks from the US show a need to harness and unleash our own resources.

      Unfor­tunately, we have a Premier who has publicly pledged to oppose resource projects. The inter­national market has shown they have no faith in the NDP. Resource industries have either left or invest­ment dollars have gone to other juris­dic­tions.

      Will the Premier stand up and admit he was wrong when he signed on as an antibusiness climate activist, and will he denounce the Leap Manifesto he once supported?

Hon. Adrien Sala (Minister of Finance): Hon­our­able Speaker, of course, with today's an­nounce­ment from the Trump gov­ern­ment, we know we continue to face uncertainty, but one thing that we want to say clearly to Manitobans: every single member of this team has your back.

      We're fighting for you, and we started right on day one when we were proud to stand in front of that big, beautiful Canadian flag in the front of this building announcing our measure imme­diately to pro­vide tax deferral relief to busi­nesses in Manitoba to give them a little bit of support with managing cash flow and ensuring that they can keep doing the im­por­tant work that they do.

      We've, of course, also taken other actions. Like the Premier has mentioned, taking US liquor off of our shelves, and we're bringing in buy Canadian legis­lation that will ensure we spend more of our dollars supporting our economy–

The Speaker: Member's time has expired.

      The honourable member for Midland, on a supple­mentary question.

Mrs. Stone: The Premier supported the antibusiness Leap Manifesto. He was also quick to sign on to Trudeau's 30‑by‑30 plan, which actively discourages resource dev­elop­ment: 30 per cent less food production, 30 per cent less energy dev­elop­ment and 30 per cent less mining production.

      We all know Manitoba is full of critical resources. But the Premier is locking them behind red 'teep'–tape with the ongoing threats of Trump's tariffs and our need to develop our own resources.

      Will the Premier walk away from his commit­ment to plan 30/30?

MLA Sala: Hon­our­able Speaker, on this side of the House we stand in op­posi­tion to Trump's tariffs and we stand together on team Canada.

      Now, that's very different than the members opposite. We know that the member for Borderland (Mr. Guenter) went on Facebook the day after Trump won his election to celebrate that individual's success after he was talking about bringing crushing tariffs to Canada.

      We know that one of the individuals running to be the leader of that party celebrated, again, Trump's tariffs in recent interviews where he was discussing and celebrating inter­ference in our demo­cracy here in Canada.

      On this side of the House we stand for team Canada, we're going to bring people together, fight for one Manitoba, we're going to continue to fight to protect jobs every single day.

The Speaker: The honourable member for Midland, on a final supplementary question.

Mrs. Stone: Hon­our­able Speaker, leaders in Canada have stood up and supported energy projects built on self-reliance. Premiers Moe and Smith have been vocal about this. Premier Houston is calling on Quebec to embrace a team Canada approach and support Canadian energy projects.

      Will the Premier (Mr. Kinew) stand up today and commit to supporting and preapproving all east-to-west pipeline energy projects in Canada?

MLA Sala: Hon­our­able Speaker, our team is in­cred­ibly proud to be building Manitoba, and we an­nounced an affordable energy plan in the fall that will see us commit to developing 600 new megawatts of wind energy in part­ner­ship with First Nations here in Manitoba.

      That stands in contrast to what we saw for seven and a half years, when Manitobans had a gov­ern­ment that didn't build one single megawatt over seven years. They didn't do the work; we're doing the work of ensuring that we have the energy to power our busi­nesses long into the future, so we can build a suc­cess­ful economy for years to come.

Changes to Canada-US Trade Agreement
Financial Support for Agri­cul­ture Industry

MLA Jeff Bereza (Portage la Prairie): Hon­our­able Speaker, inter­national trade has been a pressing con­cern for agri­cul­ture for many years. It is now coming to a head. With the–with agri­cul­ture accounting for 43.6 per cent of Manitoba's total expert–or, exports and 46 per cent of that going to the United States, any change in our trade relationships is this–of critical importance.

      What is the specific dollar value of financial aid that this minister has set aside to support the agri­cul­ture industry?

Hon. Ron Kostyshyn (Minister of Agriculture): Thank you for the question. There is no doubt agri­cul­ture is a key component with the tariff proposition that's being proposed. It's very challenging for us, as gov­ern­ment, for anybody across Canada, to deal with the roller-coaster President of making decisions today, changing them tomorrow.

      All I can say is that we, as the Agri­cul­ture Minister, and all agri­cul­ture ministers, call each other on a daily basis. In fact, on Friday we are having a meeting with all agri­cul­ture ministers and the Federal Agri­cul­tural Minister to develop a template to deal with issues, but we're not sure what exactly, based on the way Mr. Trump is operating. But I want to assure–

The Speaker: Member's time has expired.

      The honourable member for Portage la Prairie, on a supplementary question.

Manitoba's Agri­cul­ture Trade with the US

MLA Bereza: So obviously there's no plan.

      The hog industry contributes $2.3 billion to Manitoba's GDP. That's about 3 per cent of our total GDP. With nearly 100 per cent of Manitoba's live hogs heading to the US, any change in that trade scenario will be devastating. A 25 per cent tariff on Manitoba's hog industry would kill that industry very quickly.

      Why is this minister willing to accept a multi-billion dollar hole in our economy?

Mr. Kostyshyn: Thank you again for the question. And I want to ensure the critic and members opposite, we in the Agri­cul­ture De­part­ment, we're talking to Mr. Dahl on a regular basis.

* (15:00)

      We see the importance of the pork industry. We see the importance of the beef industry. We see the importance of agri­cul­ture commodities through­out this province and we continue to com­muni­cate with them.

      I don't know what it's going to take to convince members opposite that we are very, very concerned about the situations, and we will continue. We as gov­ern­ment rely on com­muni­cating with all agri­cul­ture producers and regardless we're stuck to their–from the farmland to the pro­ces­sors. And I want to ensure members opposite that we will continue to work together as one team, like–

The Speaker: Member's time has expired.

      The hon­our­able member for Portage la Prairie, on a final sup­ple­mentary question.

Manitoba's Minister of Agriculture
Meeting with US Agri­cul­ture Representatives

MLA Jeff Bereza (Portage la Prairie): Man, that sounded like all show and no go.

      Manitoba's agri­cul­ture trade with the US amounts to $4.3 billion annually. This gov­ern­ment didn't send its Agri­cul­ture Minister on a trade mission to Washington. He did, however, attend the state agri­cul­ture rural leaders conference where he declined to meet with state agri­cul­tural repre­sen­tatives because they had differing political views.

      Minister, how can you be fighting for Manitoba producers on the inter­national stage when you can't set aside your political ideology?

Hon. Ron Kostyshyn (Minister of Agriculture): Well, let me just put some­thing on record that's actual facts, is that it was my privilege to be in Iowa.

      It was my privilege to be dealing with the national accord–tri-national accord in Washington. In fact, members opposite, the critic was there at SARL convention with us, and I am not sure whether he intended to neglect to recog­nize the op­por­tun­ity that we still believe as–we are one gov­ern­ment.

      Although, I some­what rely on members opposite to help out the situation, but they tend to want to make daggers to gain some political–again, not us. We are one team. We represent everybody in the province of Manitoba, and the members opposite choose–

The Speaker: Member's time has expired.

      Order, please.

      I would just remind members when they're asking questions to direct their questions through the Chair and not directly ask someone opposite.

Metis, Michif CFS Agencies
Inquiry into MGEU Layoffs

Ms. Jodie Byram (Agassiz): Breaking news that this failed minister of family services tried to hide from Manitoba: under the personal direction of the minister, 65 MGEU workers at the Métis Child and Family Services Author­ity and at Michif Child and Family Services.

      A simple question for the failed minister: Why did she fire these 65 workers, or does she not believe every child matters?

Hon. Nahanni Fontaine (Minister of Families): The audacity of the member opposite to stand on that side with all of those individuals who actually legis­lated the rights away of Indigenous children and lost that, by the way. The audacity of that member to use all children matter in this Chamber when they have such abysmal record on supporting and doing what is in the best interest of children within child welfare.

      I certainly won't take any lessons from that member.

The Speaker: The hon­our­able member for Agassiz, on a sup­ple­mentary question.

Ms. Byram: Hon­our­able Speaker, the president of MGEU described the minister's actions as, and I quote: these reckless layoffs threaten the safety and pro­tec­tion of at-risk children and youth.

      Why is this minister threatening the safety and pro­tec­tion of children at risk?

MLA Fontaine: Our gov­ern­ment takes seriously every­body who works at putting the best interest of children in child welfare ahead of political theatre here that we're seeing. But we also know that agree­ments are–for workers are best made at the negotiation table.

      It's im­por­tant to know that in Budget 2024, we have supported the CFS system with $420 million. And since I've been in this position for 17 months, I've increased the annual dollars by $33.4 million to child welfare.

The Speaker: The honourable member for Agassiz, on a final sup­ple­mentary question.

Ms. Byram: Hon­our­able Speaker, fired workers say these layoffs are clearly, quote, an aggressive bargain­ing tactic designed to intimidate workers.

      Why is the minister risking youth just to intimi­date workers?

MLA Fontaine: Again, it's–the audacity of members to even get up and ask any questions on child welfare when they legis­lated the rights of Indigenous children away. But, also, their former boss, Heather Stefanson, would regularly accuse public servants of politics, and I would quote her that that's-where-I-draw-a-line fiasco that she tried to do.

      But let me just put facts on the record here. We have–are provi­ding an additional $11.3 million to agencies' operations.

Allied Health-Care Professionals
Possible Strike Action–Impact on Patients

Mrs. Kathleen Cook (Roblin): More than 7,000 allied health pro­fes­sionals, paramedics, mental health and addictions workers, lab and diag­nos­tic imaging staff and more are set to strike in less than nine hours.

      MAHCP told media that a strike could, quote, set Manitoba back for years when you take into con­sid­era­tion wait-lists, wait times for surgeries, tests, dif­ferent types of treatments, different types of assessments and parti­cularly emergency rooms where there's already extremely high wait times.

      How does the minister justify sitting on their hands while these critical health-care pro­fes­sionals prepare to strike? And what is their plan to mitigate the impact on patients?

Hon. Uzoma Asagwara (Minister of Health, Seniors and Long-Term Care): Hon­our­able Speaker, our gov­ern­ment has been very clear from day one that it is so im­por­tant that we get to the bargaining table, employers get to the bargaining table, and negotiate in good faith so that health-care workers can have a fair deal. We've seen a lot of success around that under our administration.

      In contrast, on that side of the House, for two terms of a PC gov­ern­ment they froze the wages of health-care workers. They fired hundreds of them. They didn't care about unions or front-line health-care providers for two terms of gov­ern­ment.

      That member doesn't care about unions and she doesn't care about front-line health-care workers. We're going to continue to encourage that those nego­tiations happen in good faith. And all Manitobans can be rest assured there are plans to ensure essential health care is in place.

The Speaker: The honourable member for Roblin, on a sup­ple­mentary question.

Mrs. Cook: A recent MAHCP survey tells a very different story than what the minister is putting on the record today. In that survey, 48 per cent of members reported staff losses in their de­part­ments in 2024; 59 per cent said morale had plummeted in the last year; and 62 per cent saw their workload increase.

      As the MAHCP president put it in their media release on the strike, quote–[interjection]

      The Premier (Mr. Kinew) may think this is hilarious but it's not going to be funny in about nine hours when 7,000 health-care workers go on strike. So I'd en­courage him to stop jeering and pay attention.

      MAHCP said, quote, the over­whelming strike mandate is another sign that the situation on the front line is not improving. He also said, quote, trust with this current gov­ern­ment has been profoundly lost–

The Speaker: Member's time has expired.

MLA Asagwara: Hon­our­able Speaker, we value front-line health-care workers, why–which is why our gov­ern­ment has ensured that employers are at the bargaining table negotiating in good faith. We've suc­cess­fully seen collective bargaining agree­ments that benefit workers take place and we're encouraging folks to stay at the table to get this done.

      On that side of the House, they froze health-care workers' wages, allied health-care worker wages, for two terms of gov­ern­ment. They created an environ­ment of moral distress and despair on the front lines. We're doing the work of cleaning up the mess and the damage that they created.

      That member has less than zero credibility on this file. And she supports the member for Fort Whyte (Mr. Khan) who wants to privatize health care and fire health-care workers. Let her stand in her place and explain that.

The Speaker: The honourable member for Roblin, on a final sup­ple­mentary question.

Hospitals in Winnipeg
Staffing Level Concerns

Mrs. Kathleen Cook (Roblin): Once again, the facts put a very different–[interjection]

The Speaker: Order.

Mrs. Cook: –story than what this minister is putting on the record.

      FIPPA docu­ments obtained by our caucus reveal the reality of allied health vacancies in Winnipeg.

      As of October 2024, Grace Hospital had a staggering 41.7 per cent vacancy rate for allied health pro­fes­sionals, one of the worst in the province. MAHCP has re­peat­edly warned that a lack of allied health pro­fes­sionals leads to serious complications for patient care. And right now there are more than 1,000 allied health vacancies across Manitoba.

* (15:10)

      Despite these alarming numbers, the NDP has no plan to retain health-care workers in Manitoba, and unions say they're not seeing the hires that this minister claims to have made.

      Why is the minister refusing to address this staffing crisis in Winnipeg hospitals?

Hon. Uzoma Asagwara (Minister of Health, Seniors and Long-Term Care): Hon­our­able Speaker, our gov­ern­ment has hired a net new 1,255 health-care workers on the front lines. Our gov­ern­ment is listen­ing to the front lines. We've seen several col­lectively bargained agree­ments at the table. We're encouraging folks to stay there.

      On that side of the House, I know it's difficult for that member to stand up and take accountability for the damage that was done to health care.

      On this side of the House, we don't run away from challenges; we face them head-on. We make invest­ments on the front lines. We listen to front-line health-care workers.

      On that side of the House, that member wants to priva­tize health care. That member supports members on that side of the House who want an American-style health-care system.

      On this side of the House, we are team Canada. We are team health care. We'll take no lessons–

The Speaker: Time has expired.

Allied Health-Care Professionals
Possible Strike Action

MLA Cindy Lamoureux (Tyndall Park): I have been hearing from my con­stit­uents in Tyndall Park that almost 7,000 publicly employed allied health pro­fes­sionals represented by the Manitoba Association of Health Care Pro­fes­sionals are fighting for a competitive contract.

      Allied health pro­fes­sionals here in Manitoba are committed to delivering front-line quality care to Manitobans every day. They are problem solvers and innovators who continue to dedicate so much to our province.

      Why is this gov­ern­ment choosing to risk a strike instead of prioritizing health-care workers in Manitoba?

Hon. Uzoma Asagwara (Minister of Health, Seniors and Long-Term Care): I thank the member for that really im­por­tant question.

      I want to reassure Manitobans that there are essen­­tial service agree­ments in place to ensure that critical and essential care is provided.

      But I also want to be clear that our gov­ern­ment has continued and will continue to be supporting employers to be at the negotiating table so that col­lectively bargained agree­ments can be in place. We've successfully seen that happen and we're encouraging the same outcome in this situation.

      I understand as the Health Minister that after two terms of a previous PC gov­ern­ment, health-care workers are frustrated. They had their wages frozen for two terms of a Conservative gov­ern­ment that didn't care about them. We're working to change the impacts of that.

      We're going to keep listening to them and pushing for a good outcome in terms of collectively bargained agree­ments in this case.

MLA Lamoureux: Allied health pro­fes­sionals are integral for our health-care system. They increase the accessibility of care, they help patients to heal and regain mobility. They promote mental wellness and healthy lifestyles. They provide support for Indigenous patients who are in locations outside of their home com­mu­nity and they provide invaluable work in emergency rooms and other front-line areas.

      Yet, Hon­our­able Speaker, even after this govern­ment promised that they had a plan to help, support for health care continues to decline.

      Why does it appear, then, that no action has been taken to avert a strike, which could happen as early as tomorrow?

MLA Asagwara: Hon­our­able Speaker, I can assure that member that work is happening. We know that parties are at the negotiating table working very hard to have a positive outcome to this process.

      As a gov­ern­ment, we've made sig­ni­fi­cant invest­ments. Beyond the 1,255 net new health-care workers, we've made sure that we have seven-day-a-week allied health-care pro­fes­sional support across the health-care system so they have more flexibility on the front lines, better work-life balance and can pro­vide care at the bedside of Manitobans.

      Again, after two terms of a PC gov­ern­ment that disrespected them, didn't engage, fired folks from the front lines, we know we have a lot of work to do. But we're going to continue to do that work to the benefit of all Manitobans.

MLA Lamoureux: And I do ap­pre­ciate the remarks from our Health Minister.

      But members of the Manitoba Association of Health Care Pro­fes­sionals, they include paramedics, respiratory therapists, speech language pathologists, physio­thera­pists, social workers, lab technologists, perfusionists. They're all part of 40 specialized allied health pro­fes­sionals.

      Can the minister please share with us what work is happening spe­cific­ally with the Manitoba Association of Health Care Pro­fes­sionals?

MLA Asagwara: Again, I would reassure that member that parties are at the table. We know that their teams are there com­muni­cating, and we're all encouraging folks to stay at the table and to come an agree­ment the workers will be satisfied with.

      You know, and I say this as somebody who worked on the front lines as a nurse, shoulder to shoulder with allied health-care pro­fes­sionals. We have a tre­men­dous amount of respect for them. We know the value they bring to the bedside of Manitobans, which is why we've made invest­ments to add more to the front lines, to continue to listen to them and to make sure they have a better work-life balance.

      We're going to continue to support these pro­cesses moving forward and, quite frankly, do the work of repairing the damage–

The Speaker: Order.

MLA Asagwara: –that was done over two terms of a failed PC gov­ern­ment that didn't care about health-care workers then and certainly doesn't care about them now.

Buy Canadian Initiative
Promotion of Local Business

MLA Carla Compton (Tuxedo): Hon­our­able Speaker, members opposite are fighting for Donald Trump and Donald Trump's tariffs.

      The MLA for Borderland fantasizes about becoming the 51st state so he can live under Donald Trump. And members opposite clap when they're told about Trump's election inter­ference in Canadian politics as part of his efforts to annex us.

      And the MLA for Fort Whyte recently said: I would like to say thank you to Trump.

      But while members opposite support Trump and his tariffs, this gov­ern­ment is supporting Manitoba busi­nesses.

      Can the Premier tell this House what we're doing to promote local busi­nesses?

Hon. Wab Kinew (Premier): It's been great to see Canadians stopping in the aisles of the grocery stores, in Costcos and markets to check where products are made. This feeling of Canadian pride is really, really amazing. It's im­por­tant for us to ensure that young people, that people of all ages–seniors–have the sup­port that they need at this time.

      We've got a remark­able plan to support local busi­nesses. We're deferring taxes for tariff-exposed in­dustries and, of course, we're pushing back against the US by removing alcohol from that country from the Liquor Mart shelves.

      On the other side of the House, what do they want to do? Each of them is racing to be Donald Trump's No. 1 cheerleader in Canada, in Manitoba. For us, you know, that was the choice that the US made; the choice that we made was to come together as Canadians. And while they may want to be the sellouts that they've always been and will be forevermore, we'll always stand up for you, the hard-working people of Manitoba.

      We'll always stand up for Canada.

Constituent with Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Health Minister's Letter to Canada Drug Agency

Mr. Grant Jackson (Spruce Woods): After months of advocacy and public outcry, the Health Minister finally met with Jeremy Bray and his family on January 21. The day before, the minister announced that they had sent a letter to the Canada Drug Agency to ask them to review their recom­men­dations for people–for treatment for people suffering from SMA. That was six weeks ago.

      Has the CDA responded to the minister's letter? And if so, what was the response?

Hon. Uzoma Asagwara (Minister of Health, Seniors and Long-Term Care): First, I want to thank Mr. Bray and his family and advocate for the op­por­tun­ity to sit down and have a con­ver­sa­tion; it was really impactful to hear his story and lived ex­per­ience directly from him.

      Our gov­ern­ment did send that letter to the CDA, and we've been actively engaged daily–sometimes multiple times a day–working with them to find a path forward. And we've been com­muni­cating regularly with Mr. Bray and keeping him up to speed.

The Speaker: The hon­our­able member for Spruce Woods on a second–sup­ple­mentary question.

Mr. Jackson: What the minister just put on the record is patently false. Jeremy Bray and his family had not received a call from the minister or their office for five and a half weeks, until the Brandon Sun approached them for comment on a story, just this past Friday.

      That's the first contact that they had from this minister or their office since the meeting in January, so that is patently false.

      Why is this minister misleading Manitobans?

MLA Asagwara: Hon­our­able Speaker, respectfully to that member, what he's put on the record is just entirely untrue. Our priority as a gov­ern­ment and as a minister–

The Speaker: Order, please.

      I'd just remind the member that suggesting that  some­thing is entirely untrue would be unparliamentary.

* (15:20)

MLA Asagwara: Hon­our­able Speaker, the member opposite may not be apprised of the hard work that our team is doing every single day to address the concerns brought forward by Mr. Bray. I can assure him that we are in contact with Mr. Bray and his family, provi­ding them updates as we do this work.

      I will also state that it is a shame that, while I met with Mr. Bray and his family, when he brought this concern forward under the previous gov­ern­ment, they never met. They never responded. They only said no. Fun­da­mentally different than our approach, Hon­our­able Speaker.

      We'll continue to work directly with Mr. Bray and his family, unlike the failed previous gov­ern­ment.

The Speaker: The time for oral questions has expired.

      And I would caution all members on both sides to be a little more cautious with the language they use. There's several instances today that were very close to crossing the line, and I will be keeping a closer eye on it in the future and calling you if you're getting even close to that line in the future.

      Petitions? Grievances?

ORDERS OF THE DAY

GOVERNMENT BUSINESS

Hon. Nahanni Fontaine (Government House Leader): Hon­our­able Speaker, will you call for a debate, the re-ap­point­ment of the Manitoba Ombudsman, followed by resume of the gov­ern­ment reso­lu­tion.

The Speaker: Been announced by the hon­our­able Gov­ern­ment House Leader that we will debate the gov­ern­ment reso­lu­tion on the ap­point­ment of the Ombudsman, followed by resumed debate on the gov­ern­ment reso­lu­tion, Manitoba is stronger together against Donald Trump's tariff tax threats.

Government Resolution

Reappointment of the Manitoba Ombudsman

Hon. Nahanni Fontaine (Government House Leader): I move, seconded by the Minister of Finance (MLA Sala),

      WHEREAS the Standing Committee on Legis­lative Affairs recom­mends to the Legis­lative Assembly of Manitoba that Jill Perron be re-appointed as the Manitoba Ombudsman.

      THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to subsections 2(1), 2(1.1) and 4(1) of The Ombudsman Act, Jill Perron will be re-appointed as the Manitoba Ombudsman.

Motion presented.

The Speaker: There any debate?

      Seeing none, is the House ready for the question?

Some Honourable Members: Question.

The Speaker: The question before the House is the reso­lu­tion reappointing Jill Perron as the Manitoba Ombudsman.

      All in favour? Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

      The motion is accordingly passed.

Debate on Government Resolution

Manitoba is Stronger Standing Together Against Donald Trump's Tariff Tax and Threats

The Speaker: We will now resume debate on the gov­ern­ment reso­lu­tion as announced earlier.

      Standing in the name of the hon­our­able member for Midland, who has 27 minutes remaining.

Mrs. Lauren Stone (Midland): Hon­our­able Speaker, I'd like to start off my remarks today by saying, as I have been saying for three months, that I am against the US tariffs on Canadian goods.

      The free market is critical to our success as a country, and pro­tec­tionist policies distorts the open market. This has been proven time and time and time again. It has been a disappointing week as decades of friendship and economic ties have been damaged.

      I've had the op­por­tun­ity through­out my career to work in agri­cul­ture and manufacturing sectors, and I know first-hand the devastating effects that these tariffs will have on Manitoba's economy. Today, these tariffs are hitting my family, my neighbours and my friends who own busi­nesses in these sectors and farm and produce Manitoba's food. These are industries that are being directly hit. These are industries that my con­stit­uency is heavily reliant on.

      Our con­stit­uencies on this side of the House are being directly hit: manufacturing, agri­cul­ture, energy. And this is why we have been pressing for an all-party com­mit­tee to respond and develop solutions.

      For months, we have been calling on this NDP gov­ern­ment for a plan. They responded that they do not operate in hypotheticals, but now, this is reality. There is no more hiding from it. Although Trump gave us a delay, things continue to remain uncertain. People are frustrated. They're angry. And times are uncertain.

      We could be living this for another two weeks. We could be living this for two years. We must come together as a country and a province to stand up for industries, busi­nesses and Manitobans who will be impacted in one way or another by these tariffs.

Mr. Tyler Blashko, Deputy Speaker, in the Chair

      But standing up for Manitobans requires more than just a photo op outside of the Manitoba Legislature. It requires more than just words. It requires a plan, and it requires action. And I'm not referring to short-term delay tactics. I'm calling for meaningful solutions that will unleash our economic potential for Manitoba and create a competitive busi­ness environ­ment for Manitobans to flourish.

      Unfor­tunately, NDP and Liberal gov­ern­ments in Canada and Manitoba have created an anti-competitive climate through high taxation and pro­tec­tions against land dev­elop­ment and energy dev­elop­ment that have limited our potential in this province.

      The NDP are clearly caught between their own ideology and reality, and the reality is that it's time for the NDP to quit their anti-busi­ness rhetoric. The NDP and the Premier (Mr. Kinew) supported the Leap Manifesto. The Premier supported Trudeau's 30-by-30 plan, taking 30 per cent out of food production, 30 per cent out of energy production, 30 per cent out of 'minmor'–mineral exploration. And the Premier refused to stand up today and commit to supporting and preapproving an east-west energy pipeline project to ensure energy in­de­pen­dence here in Manitoba.

      The NDP should imme­diately eliminate the pay­roll tax for busi­nesses. This is a job-killing tax. It is an NDP-created tax that penalizes companies that hire more Manitobans. This is a labour tax; this is a job tax and this is a company tax here in Manitoba. They've put it under the guise of health and edu­ca­tion, but in reality, it just goes into general revenue of the–at the expense of employers and employees and busi­nesses here in Manitoba. Manitoba continues to have the highest payroll tax in Canada–4.3 per cent on busi­nesses with payroll over $1.5 million. This is a huge slap on our current operating busi­nesses in Manitoba and deters any invest­ment and future busi­ness growth in the province.

      The NDP should also slash income taxes and eliminate edu­ca­tion property taxes. Last year, we saw this NDP gov­ern­ment irresponsibly increase income taxes on Manitobans and increase edu­ca­tion property taxes. This is the exact opposite of what gov­ern­ments in this country should be doing right now to ensure and encourage affordability and foster economic growth in this province. They are literally taxing out–us out of competition with other juris­dic­tions.

      The NDP should also imme­diately remove carbon tax on home heating. Manitoba does not have a choice–Manitobans do not have a choice in how they heat their homes. The carbon tax is set to rise in a few weeks, costing Manitoba households hundreds of dollars.

      And now I want to speak to our reliance on foreign markets and interprovincial trade barriers. Our reliance on foreign markets has grown significantly over the years, where it's often cheaper to import goods and products half a world away by sea, rail or truck than it is to domestically produce here in our own province and country.

      There are more restrictions on interprovincial trade than intercontinental, differing environ­mental regula­tions, licensing, certification, labour mobility, trucking, health and safety, among a host of others. These barriers increase costs to Manitobans and they in­crease costs to busi­nesses.

* (15:30)

      This is a problem, and this is exactly why Canada is in the challenge that it is in. The Canadian Federation of Independent Busi­ness has stated that removing these barriers could boost the economy by $200 billion annually.

      Labour mobility is one of Manitoba's weakest barriers, and Manitoba has the most to gain, and there's op­por­tun­ity to stream­line the certification and licensing require­ments to attract labour from other provinces into Manitoba.

      Further to this, the NDP should imme­diately repeal their Labour laws that trample workers' rights and deters busi­ness gross and–busi­ness growth and invest­ment here in Manitoba.

      As I spoke about earlier today, the NDP needs to put their ideology aside and remove protectionist land policies that deter invest­ment and unleashing Manitoba's economic potential. In the last year, Manitoba has dropped to next in last in Canada for dollars devoted to mining and energy and forestry projects.

      As I said, the NDP supported the Leap Manifesto. They proudly supported Trudeau's 30‑by‑30 plan. This deters invest­ment in Manitoba and hangs a closed-for-busi­ness sign on our province.

      This–these policies–these protectionist policies–limit our ability to unleash our own potential here in Manitoba, and I'm calling on the Premier (Mr. Kinew) to commit to supporting and improving all east-west pipeline energy projects here in Manitoba and across the country to ensure that we have Canadian energy in­de­pen­dence. And I still have not received an answer to that question.

      Over the past few months, economists have indicated a 25 per cent blanket tariff will result in zero economic growth in Canada, with higher inflation. This, in turn, is going to put pressure on our already-struggling Canadian dollar. We all saw this week as our dollar has dipped to near-22-year lows, and this has been happening since November, while stocks tumbled in response to these tariffs. We are all feeling the pain this week.

      The weakened Canadian dollar will increase im­port costs, raising prices that Canadian households pay for the goods from the US and other countries. This pushes us further into the negative. Costs of living, weaker em­ploy­ment, inflation and a weaker dollar will all negatively impact Manitobans.

      And what we have seen is weak leadership. We've seen weak leadership at the prov­incial level. It's a good thing that Canada has Premier Ford and Premier Smith standing up for Canada, because this Premier is so out of his league on this topic.

      Canada is an easy target for Trump because of weak leadership, prov­incially here in Manitoba and federally. The Trudeau Liberals, which have been propped up by the NDP, have deteriorated Canada's strength and position on the global stage.

      We do need a team Canada approach, where all the premiers are singing the same tune; but we also need a team Manitoba approach, as these tariffs will impact all Manitobans from every corner of the province. I've already spoken to the impacts that this is going to have on my con­stit­uency. Many of my colleagues on this side of the House all have these industries that are directly being hit and impacted today. My family, my friends, my neighbours are dealing with this: these costs that increased yesterday and this week. This is a direct impact to us, and our con­stit­uencies are suffering as a result, and this NDP continues to laugh and jeer and not take this issue seriously, when we are the ones–we are hearing this, we are seeing this, and we are feeling this in our con­stit­uencies on this side of the House.

      We do need an all-party com­mit­tee, because this Premier and this NDP gov­ern­ment have shown that they are out of the–their league on this topic. He nods along with whatever Premier Ford and Premier Smith said, and as I mentioned, it's a good thing they're the ones speaking for Canada and not this Premier in Manitoba.

      Any negotiations with the Trump administration that will impact our prov­incial industries should be consulted on with all members of this House to ensure that all corners and all areas of this House are well represented.

      So we do–we need to come together as legis­lators. We need to consult with key impacted stake­holders and come up with a meaningful economic response plan. As I mentioned, advertisements, photo ops, stickers–that is not a meaningful economic response plan. We need to start unleashing Manitoba's potential. We need to start ensuring that these land protectionist policies and NDP ideology that is hindering invest­ment here in Manitoba is stopped, and we need to encourage invest­ment and job growth in this province while ensuring in­de­pen­dence in manufacturing, energy, agri­cul­ture and stop our reliance on foreign markets.

      So, with that, I will conclude my remarks, and thank you, Hon­our­able Speaker, for–Deputy Speaker, for giving me the op­por­tun­ity to put a few words on the record today.

      Thank you.

Hon. Nellie Kennedy (Minister of Sport, Culture, Heritage and Tourism): Thank you, hon­our­able assist­ant Deputy Speaker. I–Deputy Speaker; I apologize.

      It gives me pleasure to rise today to speak to this issue. Certainly, you know, I ap­pre­ciate members oppo­site and their opinion on how our Premier and our gov­ern­ment are handling these enormous tariffs that President Trump is imposing on Canada. And what I would say is: It's just an opinion.

      Our Premier has done an in­cred­ible job of deciding and figuring, with the leaders–the other first ministers in Canada–along with the Prime Minister, about how to respond to the threat of tariffs.

      And now tariffs–and now I think there's a reprieve again, today, for 30 days. The plan is clear, is that we stand up for Manitobans. We work together, we ensure that people–their jobs–are protected, that we address issues with regards to industries and where tariffs may have the most impact. We have a solid plan and a strategy moving forward and we're releasing infor­ma­tion practically on a daily basis.

      So, the members opposite can stay tuned for all of the plans that we have come up with as a gov­ern­ment. I ap­pre­ciate this idea of all-party sort of situation, but really, at this point, I'd like to ask the members opposite: Did that happen when the pandemic was happening? Like, you came up with a lot of things on your own and that's not the way it works.

      Our gov­ern­ment has a plan to deal with tariffs, and thank goodness the NDP are in power under the great leadership of our Premier, Wab Kinew. And I just can't imagine where Manitoba would be right now–oh, sorry.

The Deputy Speaker: Unfor­tunately, you can only refer to members by their con­stit­uency or their portfolio.

MLA Kennedy: Thank you, I ap­pre­ciate that. My apologies.

      I will continue on my point, though: Thank goodness that–for Manitobans that the NDP gov­ern­ment, along with–under the leadership of our Premier (Mr. Kinew), are at the helm and being the ones who are in charge of producing a strategy to deal with Trump's threats of tariffs and his ridiculous language of annexing Canada and making it the 51st state. I can't imagine what would be happening if the PC gov­ern­ment was in power.

      So I am thankful and I know that our Premier and our Cabinet team and our caucus team are up to the task to ensuring that we stand together as Manitobans and that we have a plan moving forward with regards to addressing these tariffs.

      Now I want to take a moment and talk about my portfolio spe­cific­ally, which is Sport, Culture, Heritage and Tourism. So I know a lot of Manitobans, it's causing a lot of stress. People are asking: What can we do? It is a roller-coaster ride going up and down, up and down, with regards to whether Trump will or won't or if he stops or walks it back with the tariffs.

      And a lot of people want to feel, like: What can I do? How can I take control of this situation? And so we see the efforts of our gov­ern­ment encouraging people to buy local, to buy products made in Canada, which is in­cred­ibly im­por­tant. And people have really stepped up in this regard. The patriotic pride that Canadians are feeling with regards to threats that our country would become a 51st state fills me with great pride.

* (15:40)

      And so a part of buying local, supporting local, is also travelling local. Tourism is an in­cred­ibly im­por­tant part of our economy in Manitoba, and we have thousands upon thousands of jobs that the tourism industry supports.

      And while we continue to welcome our American brothers and sisters and folks from across the border to visit our beautiful province, we would encourage that Manitobans, instead of, you know, travelling to the United States or wherever they may take their next vacation, that they stay within Manitoba or within Canada and explore what we have to offer here right at home.

      There are some in­cred­ible places that you can visit in Manitoba where you can be a tourist in your own province. I know for myself, in the summer especially, I love to get out to our prov­incial parks. There are many camping op­por­tun­ities available through­out our province to be in the outdoors–fishing and, you know, if you're into hunting. There's an enormous amount to do, whether it's boating or–I could go on forever.

      We have in­cred­ible tour operators within our province. And in the winter, of course, there's lots of other things to do. There's groomed trails that are just in­cred­ible. You know, you can cross-country ski, there's snowmobiling, snowshoeing and there's so many things to do.

      So what I would say is, you know, people are asking what can they do to take control and, you know, make a difference with regards to this scenario, and I would put that to them that Manitobans, you know, stick around home and in our province and explore what our province has to offer.

      Certainly, I think what's–some­thing I would like to really maybe shift gears a little bit here is to talk about Canadian values.

      So for myself, I was born and raised in Canada, here in Manitoba in the Interlake, and I've lived here all my life. And I've always been a very proud Canadian and a very proud Manitoban. And so when I see things like Donald Trump coming and, you know, saying things like he's going to absorb Canada, the US is going to absorb Canada, we're going to become the 51st state, what I would–it really does elicit such a sense of pride–national pride in me.

      And so the way I came to be is, you know, a person who is a part of this country and such a proud Canadian and Manitoban is, you know, my paternal grandparents moved here. They first moved from Lebanon and Syria to Crookston, Minnesota, in the early 1900s, and they lived there for, I think, three or four years–I might get that wrong, but in and around that time. And they were invited to move to Canada on the homesteaders act. And so they decided that they would do this.

      They moved to the Interlake. They were invited to be there. They became landowners. This country afforded them the op­por­tun­ity to become farmers, to become landowners and to settle in a place that was unfamiliar to them, but a place that they imme­diately loved and became a part of the com­mu­nity and were proud Canadians for their entire–and Manitobans. They never left Manitoba. And my father and his siblings were born in the Interlake and lived there. All eight siblings lived there. They were proud farmers. They con­tri­bu­ted to this province's economy and many remained through­out their many years.

      And my mother was born and raised in Lebanon, and she moved here in her early twenties. My mom has lived in Manitoba and Canada for 50 years and she is proudly Canadian. I remember her taking her citizenship exam and being so proud of her and her being very thrilled. It's a great memory as a child, and she's proudly been Canadian.

The op­por­tun­ities afforded to me as a woman, an Arab woman, from the decisions that my grandparents made and my mother made to make Manitoba and Canada their home, is in­cred­ible. I've had wonderful op­por­tun­ities afforded to me by this country. I have pursued higher edu­ca­tion. I have the freedom to choose how I want to live my life. I have the freedom to choose who I love, and we all as Canadians have these basic human rights and freedoms that our country provides to us.

      And that is not the case through­out the world. And I will say even further to that, with Trump, you know, as the president in the United States currently, he's certainly–like, this is startling, the fascism that is occurring, and the way this person has systematically signed away human rights for people in the United States is startling.

      And so we have people who were looking to move to Canada because of this, people who aren't recog­nized as the gender that they identify as. How can that be when it's just across the border? But it is. And it's terrifying.

      So what I would say is I am truly proudly Canadian and I would put to folks that the basic human rights and individual freedoms that we enjoy here need to be protected. We cannot be absorbed by the United States. We cannot become the 51st state.

      And I would have to argue with whatever figure the member from Borderland brought up yesterday. It just seems like truly unbelievable that 43 per cent, or whatever the case was, of people in his age group would rather be–like, I just–I don't even understand that.

      The sense of Canadian pride in what people–the responses that we have seen from folks is over­whelming; it is over­whelming. And so how do we protect against this with the tariffs that Trump con­tinually threatens, takes back, threatens, takes back?

      And what I would say is, is that people need to ensure that they recog­nize just how serious this is because which–what Trump is proposing to do under the veil of tariffs, or whatever the case, is to just simply take Canada over. We have our critical minerals here, which I'm sure is some­thing that the president wants. And we need to ensure that we are not falling for this fentanyl busi­ness that the president says is an issue. I mean, these are all, you know, I think, just excuses as to what the president is trying to do.

      And so what I would say is just to–for all of us to ensure that we recog­nize just how im­por­tant us standing up for ourselves as Canadians is, that we need to ensure that we stay as a country, you know, that is united and strong and free, free to be sovereign, the–to continue to be the sovereign nation that we are.

      So with that, hon­our­able Deputy speaky–Speaker, I will end my words. I ap­pre­ciate the time.

      Thank you.

MLA Jeff Bereza (Portage la Prairie): It's an honour for me today to be able to speak on this topic that is so near and dear to all of our hearts here in Manitoba and Canada. For someone to threaten our sovereignty, for someone to threaten our way of life, we need to stand up.

      I want to say, as the member of Portage la Prairie, and I say this a number of times, I am proud to be from Portage la Prairie, Manitoba, Canada. It's the place where I was born. It's the place where I live. And, hopefully, it'll be the place that I die, but not die before making a difference, hopefully, with this great country of ours, Canada.

      Hon­our­able Speaker, Tuesday, Manitobans saw our closest ally and neighbour was willing to wage an unprovoked economic war. We all knew it was coming, but held out hope that cooler heads would prevail and that all Manitobans would not be left holding the bag at the end of the day.

      Unfor­tunately, in this case, when the world places obstacles in the path of Manitobans, we as legis­lators have a respon­si­bility to step in, step up and act.

* (15:50)

      Regardless of the industry, Manitobans are con­cerned this week. Prices for staples and essentials have already been out of control over the last year, and now we add economic chaos to this as well.

      The extent of this gov­ern­ment's plan or non-plan is to defer payroll taxes for three months. That isn't even relief. It is kicking the can down the road and hoping that someone else comes up with a solution instead of coming up with a made-in-Manitoba-for-all-of-Canada solution.

      The ideas are out there. Experts have done the Premier's (Mr. Kinew) homework for him. The Canadian Federation of In­de­pen­dent Busi­ness has solutions for real help. Agri­cul­ture producers know what they need. Keystone agri­cul­ture produced a whole list.

      It's really too bad that the minister and his gov­ern­ment aren't listening. We could enact many of these today if there was a political will, and farmers could enter into the spring knowing that they were supported and not left fighting both disaster of man and nature alone.

      Let's work through these sug­ges­tions.

      One of the first ones is increase invest­ment–this comes from the Keystone agri­cul­ture producers. Increase invest­ment to align policies that will increase local demand and expand value-added capacity.

      Manitobans want to support local. You can see that in the grocery store. In fact, the private sector has figured this out already, indicating Canadian products.

      We can support these initiatives, empower our Crown cor­por­ations to provide that all-im­por­tant and valuable shelf space to Manitoba industries with less regular access. We can also take a step in this direction, too, and stop shopping in American grocery stores like our Premier talked about today with Costco.

      Again, from Keystone agri­cul­ture producers: expedite permitting to facilitate expansion of value-added production and processing. In the long-term, this idea of supporting demand–local demand to get ahead of another problem we know is coming.

      In January 2026, new product label restrictions in the US will have a dramatic impact on Manitoba pork, where many weanlings are finished and processed in the US. Between these tariffs and the threats for next year, pork producers need to know that they're sup­ported and that their industry will not be decimated when the route south closes. That would require invest­ment now. These weanlings don't stop growing. This industry will be decimated within a very short few weeks, and we have not heard of any plan to work through that.

      Work with other prairie provinces to leverage our shared interest and resources, including through en­gage­ment with individual key US states identified by industry.

      I've had the opportunity to com­muni­cate with and work with–for colleagues across Canada and now across the US. I was elected to the board of SARL, the State Agri­cul­ture and Rural Leaders. What we all know is that producers and manufacturers on both sides of the border will be the ones footing the bill for this political grandstanding.

      Our side was called out yesterday by the member of St. Johns for not doing anything, not being seen out there. This started for me when I thought about becoming part of the SARL board to be elected to in early December. What I did at that time is I walked across the floor and spoke to the Minister of Agri­cul­ture (Mr. Kostyshyn), because I think it is im­por­tant in this situation that we put politics aside from this.

      After the US election ended, we needed to be ready for tariffs. From working in the agri­cul­ture busi­ness on both sides of the border, I could see what was happening, and I spoke to the Ag Minister about this not once, not twice, three different times, and told him that I was thinking about running for the board of SARL again, to let him know that if he wanted to run against me I was fine with that, but we needed a repre­sen­tative from Canada. We needed someone from Canada to sit on that board, that board that represents 40 states and every province in Canada, and I was so proud to put my name forward to be a member of–on that SARL board.

      The other thing to let the member from St. Johns know, and if they followed me on Facebook they would be able to tell, that I was so proud to stand up on the stage of SARL, invite the Minister of Agri­cul­ture (Mr. Kostyshyn) to join me, invite all the Canadians to join me in the singing of O Canada. I feel so good about that today that if I knew I wouldn't be called out, it's time for us to all stand together in this Chamber and sing O Canada.

"O Canada. Our home and native land. / True patriot love in all of us command. / With glowing hearts we see thee rise, / The True North, strong and free. / From far and wide, / O Canada, we stand on guard for thee. / God keep our land glorious and free. / O Canada, we stand on guard for thee. / O Canada, we stand on guard for thee."

The Deputy Speaker: I will caution all members that we don't usually sing in the Chamber.

MLA Bereza: Hon­our­able Deputy Speaker, thank you for giving me that latitude and thank you for letting me sing the greatest anthem in the world, and I'm so proud.

      Again, when we were down at SARL, I have to say in meeting with both Canadian, American repre­sen­tatives, meeting with, also with our consul down there, too, there's a lot of people that want to deal with Canada.

      The thing that I'm concerned about is when we are in places like that, and again, right now, in a situation that we're in right now, why is our Ag Minister not at the Commodity Classic, again, which is one of the largest agriculture trade shows in North America, to meet with the US agri­cul­ture minister, Brooke Collings?

      Shaun Haney with Real Agri­cul­ture was able to get a meeting with her. Why can our Minister of Agri­cul­ture not go to things like that?

      Here's another tip: Next week is a conference that I used to enjoy going to called World Agri‑Tech in San Francisco. That will be ag people from all over the world, and what a place to be to try and attract busi­ness to our country than to be at Agri‑Tech.

* (16:00)

      We need to continue to look for op­por­tun­ities out there, like our neighbours in Saskatchewan are doing right now. The deputy minister of agri­cul­ture, Bill Greuel, has been in India looking for busi­ness in the protein and pulse industry right now. The minister of trade, Warren Kaeding, has been all over Southeast Asia looking for places that we can use as other op­por­tun­ities to sell our goods.

      Where's our Ag Minister been? Right there, sitting here waiting for those busi­nesses to come to us. They're not coming to us; we have to go and look after them.

      The minister of agri­cul­ture for Alberta has just announced another canola crushing plant. We have some of the best canola yields in all of North America. So why are we not looking to those places? Why are we sitting here and not doing anything about trying to do this? Again, it's all show and no go.

      Our farmers are feeding the world. The–our feeders are–our farmers are trying to feed the world. They provide carrots, potatoes, onions for the less fortunate. Yes, we–yet we want to continue to make them less competitive than our–than those that are in provinces right next to us in western Canada.

      Our farmers right now have to deal with our federal carbon tax that this NDP gov­ern­ment is backing in order to make things more uncompetitive. The Manitoba Trucking Association, who is going to move potatoes and hogs and canola and wheat all over the place, but yet they are stuck with a federal carbon tax.

      This isn't about words; it's about action. And it's time that we stood up and made some action out there and did some­thing for this great country of ours, Canada.

      Thank you, hon­our­able Deputy Speaker, for letting me put some words on the record.

      Thank you very much.

Hon. Ron Kostyshyn (Minister of Agriculture): It's always my pleasure to talk about agri­cul­ture and the importance of agri­cul­ture in the province of Manitoba and in Canada, in the world.

      Obviously, the tariffs situation is making it more and more challenging for all of us in the agri­cul­ture sector. As I indicated earlier, it is truly a roller coaster of regula­tions, ideas, starting at–in our second month now of delays, of what's it going to be?

      I have to tell you, my con­ver­sa­tions with the Manitoba Pork, Manitoba beef associations, a number of other organi­zations, they're just as frustrated as I am. And, as I indicated in question period, we've been in constant communications with all agri­cul­ture ministers or deputy ministers through­out Canada. And as I have said earlier, tomorrow, at abut 1:30, we are having a live video meeting with all ministers across Canada and the federal agri­cul­ture minister as well.

      I–our intent is to be proactive to have a chance to work with the agri­cul­ture de­part­ments in–across Canada. And I know that the member opposite, the–from Portage la Prairie is kind of chirping in the back­ground, and I think he's trying to get some attention. Well, I'll give him the attention if I could, but, obviously, at the end of the day–

An Honourable Member: I'm looking right at you, buddy.

Mr. Kostyshyn: Yes, it's okay.

      Well, you know, here we go. Here's–our critic would sooner be kind of the joke of the con­ver­sa­tion of the importance of agri­cul­ture, and I'm saying to him, and I'm trying to explain to him that the situation that we are facing because of the tariffs of the gov­ern­ment to the south–and I have to honestly tell you, when I was down in Iowa, I was down in Minneapolis, we were down there, we met with a number of organi­zations. And I honestly have to tell you, deputy hon­our­able Speaker, that the reception we received as a Canadian, Manitoban delegations of the importance of agri­cul­ture products that we have a great trading relationship.

      In fact, to the point when I talked to Mr. Cam Dahl, and he kept reassuring me we have the greatest working relationship with the US counterparts, to the point of 3.2 million weanlings get shipped every year down south to Iowa.

      And when I spoke to the Iowa pork producers, they said we have choices in our country to obtain weanlings somewhere else. But, no, because of the quality of the breed of weanlings that we, in Manitoba, produce, it's top notch. And that is why–that is why Iowa continues to want to buy pork from us.

      And it's almost at a point where they're probably in a situation of doing the financial calculations of where they see that they want to maintain this trading relationship of the importance.

      We talked about the beef industry, and as I indicated it earlier, when we–Matt Atkinson at the Manitoba Beef Producers general meeting, we had a great con­ver­sa­tion. His comment to me was a concern of where the beef prices may land up given the proposal of tariffs. And being a beef producer for 40 years of my life, hon­our­able Deputy Speaker, the prices today–it's been long-awaited for the rightful people in the beef industry.

      Although probably prices today should be main­tained for a while, but unfor­tunately, the gov­ern­ment across from us, when they chose to make changes to the Crown Lands Act, accelerated the financial burdens that they are dealing with today. And they are still trying to recover from a 300 per cent rental increase in operations.

      And I say to the member–to the critic across–I'm not sure if he knows what a beef animal is, but I will assure you that I will share the point, as agri­cul­ture producer for 40 years of my life, that I knew darn well what was happening.

      And it's unfor­tunate, Deputy Speaker, is that the beef industry is in the numbers of what they were in 1960, cow numbers North American‑wide. And what we see of no encouragement by the members opposite to give the young family farms an op­por­tun­ity to continue to grow.

      But the tariffs that are being proposed, the reality is is that animals will be moving between US and Canada on a regular basis, and some animals may have crossed the border twice. So every time that one animal goes across, it's a 25 per cent tariff.

      And as to the con­ver­sa­tion we had with the Iowa pork, Minneapolis young farmers, the gov­ern­ment, the commissioners, and while we all agreed on the fact, is that this is nothing more than an accelerated cost for consumers in the US side and in the Canada side.

      Unfor­tunately, you know what? The members have no under­standing. The members–in fact, almost to the point where they–the member from Fort Whyte said thank you to Donald Trump. Can you honestly accept the fact that–why would you want to say that in the face of the tariff discussions and the threat? Do you really think that you're sticking up for the farmers? I don't think so.

* (16:10)

      It's unfor­tunate that we build bridges for allies to work against this action. I'm thinking this as the Premier (Mr. Kinew) has assembled the US Trade Council, and unfor­tunately your gov­ern­ment chose to dismiss the individual that was in Washington for a lot of years, that provided an op­por­tun­ity of continuing com­muni­cation for the agri­cul­ture industry in the province of Manitoba, or a repre­sen­tative from Canada–from Manitoba–that stuck up for a number of things that exist.

      So unfor­tunately what we have is, we have a situation where members opposite choose to go on the high roadside, on the US side. In fact, we almost have individuals that are saying that they'd sooner be an American than being a Manitoban or Canadian. It should have been–too bad that we've had this situation continue on for as long as it had. [interjection]

      Oh, here we go. Here we go, Hon­our­able Speaker–Deputy Speaker. I love the attention that I'm creating, because obviously I must be hitting a few notes, for the members opposite, of concern, and the–but you know, when we talk about the importance of trade–and I'm not sure if the members opposite has ever really brought it to surface, but–agri­cul­ture with the trade that we have between Canada and Manitoba–or, US and Manitoba is $9.28 billion worth of ag food products in 2004. We exported that many dollars, a decrease of about 1.3, and we exported 9.4 in 2023.

      So we built a great relationship, deputy honour Speaker, and we continue want to build a great working relationship. What we are faced with: the uncertainty of the roller-coaster decisions that being made. As I said, we've been talking to the agri­cul­ture ministers through­out Canada. We've been talking to a number of individuals that are directly going to be affected by the food processing industry, and we know for a fact, deputy hon­our­able Speaker, is the price of food continues to rise.

      And you wonder why, when we are 'pomoting' buy local, that members opposite choose to vote against some­thing like that. They'd sooner do what, they'd sooner find food from somewhere else? The importance of food and agri­cul­ture is a main staple in our opinion. What we need to do is get together, and as we are–as I indicated earlier–with the agri­cul­ture ministers across Canada and the federal agri­cul­ture minister, that we continue to provide some programs.

      So we need to do–[interjection] That's right, team Canada. Team Canada. And what I'm hearing from members opposite–he chooses not to have that con­ver­sa­tion what­so­ever. He'd sooner be on the US side, much related to the hockey game, and we have to win in overtime to make it–

An Honourable Member: What about the blue panel? The Obby jersey?

Mr. Kostyshyn: Yes, exactly.

      So–no, unfor­tunately we are living in a world–and I want to stress the importance of agri­cul­ture. Now only are we worried about the–a machine we manufacturing, increase cost, and these members across are some­what more on the side of not con­sid­ering being a team Canada player. We have got potential–potential someone–to be recog­nized, and all of a sudden he is choosing to be more sup­port­ive of the US kind of lifestyle than support Manitoba and Canada op­por­tun­ities.

      I do want to say it's definitely too bad that mem­bers opposite choose to make this a political game. I'm not doing it this way. I've gotten together with a number of agri­cul­ture producers, and we continue to fight for the betterment of what we have today in Manitoba, and we have in Canada.

      The–[interjection] Well, well, well, well. It's unfor­tunate the members opposite is choosing to want to criticize what we're doing, such a great–all I can say to them is that, if it was such a great mentality of the member opposite chirping, why did he allow for agri­cul­ture Crown lands to be at the state it is today? And we tend to see this coming along in a long, long way.

      In fact, almost to the point, it's almost to the point, deputy honour Speaker, that he is choosing to say that the sale of Crown lands was to be used for what a purpose. Was it really a purpose to provide young entrepreneurs a chance to get ahead? Was it an op­por­tun­ity to have cor­por­ate involvement and dismiss of a lot of the family farms organi­zations? And maybe what we have to do, a 'frippa' in­vesti­gation, to see whether there was that underlying current as I'm–just referred to earlier. And we unfor­tunately might have to see the truth may eventually come out.

      The im­por­tance of the op­por­tun­ity of the highest paycheck would get property lease rates, but yet–but poor young farm–generational farmers–stood no chance. And why would that gov­ern­ment across the road there choose not to support young agri­cul­ture producers in the province of Manitoba?

      We continue to ask that question, but yet we have no answer.

      I know the member opposite chooses to–you know, he spent most of his life selling agri­cul­ture commodity products. I'm not sure if he ever even got on a horse, but he–definitely it's interesting that the member oppo­site is talking about the importance of the fact, almost to the point where this morning we had a conference call, Roquette, and the im­por­tance of agri­cul­ture in the province of Manitoba. And Roquette–the MLA for the Portage area and the dollars that have gone into the–we continue to work with them. And the tariffs definitely will be a concern for them as well when we're talking about the protein that Roquette as a manufacturer does as well.

      In fact, what we have today–we spoke to Simplot a week ago, and the question that was asked just yesterday on the op­por­tun­ity of potato production–well, you know what? The actual–what happened was is that prior to the last prov­incial election, that gov­ern­ment went around and promised a lot of the potato growers we're going to provide more irrigation water so you can grow more and more potatoes.

      As it turns out, that did not happen, actually. What it was is that, as we spoke to the producers and the farmers that said that, well, we were more or less told that's what going to happen. Well, unfor­tunately, we have regula­tions that regulate the use of water and we need to be very conscientious of the water usage that is provided. But yet, it was more of a campaign promise that that side chose to use and take advantage of the farmers that exist and they're trying to make a living at it.

      So, Hon­our­able Speaker, I–Deputy Speaker, I stress again to you: members opposite choose to make it a political game. I spent 40 years of my life doing the cattle industry, worked hard on the farm to make things happen. I was not a salesman; I was an actual farmer doing what I was brought up to do and I continue to do that on the up.

      What we need is an op­por­tun­ity for the young producers today to stay on the farm and make an attractive living at it. They don't want to be millionaires. They don't want to be whatever they are. They just want a comfortable lifestyle.

      But they are making it very challenging. Members opposite made it very challenging for those family farms to continue on, almost to the point where there was no regula­tions of farms that were recently sold, compliments to their template of op­por­tun­ity that took it away, took it away from young family farm pro­ducers and op­por­tun­ity for them to continue to benefit of the op­por­tun­ity of benefitting in the program that exists today.

      And, hon­our­able Deputy Speaker, I'm being very repetitious in what I'm going to be saying here, but I think the point is this–can I have a glass of water, please–yes–is the fact that this is not a game. This is not a political game, as I hear members opposite chirping about. I think what I'm saying is what we need to do is we need to revisit the op­por­tun­ity, because agri­cul­ture is not only beneficial for the family farms in geographic areas.

      I am a rural individual. I believe in rural economic dev­elop­ment. And what was taken away from the young producers, well, the Crown lands situation was all their fault. They'll never admit to it, hon­our­able Deputy Speaker, but they will have to accept it sooner than later because the truth will come out. Op­por­tun­ities–the truth will come out of what was happening in that op­por­tun­ity soon.

* (16:20)

      What needs to be done is we need to continue to work with the rural economy, and I know our de­part­ment will definitely continue to provide op­por­tun­ities of economic dev­elop­ment processing in the market­place.

      Well, hon­our­able Deputy Speaker, he's asking me the plan. I can tell you what their plan was, the mem­bers opposite. They were prepared to take all Crown land away from individuals because the size of the cheque was the only way that they would able to obtain the Crown lands.

      So what we see is now apprehension and then put it into an auction. All we're going to have is a number of large cor­por­ations owning a bunch of land, and maybe I could refer to–in the–any stolen country. Let me use that for an example. Let's–I'll give you some actual facts when I talk about the producers in that area, where they can honestly tell me that it was very conveniently set up to make high prices, and there was no op­por­tun­ity for anybody else to move in.

      And in fact I talked to a number of ranchers in that parti­cular area, and they've said, you know what, it was very strategically planned by the larger operations coming in and conveniently picking up land in that designated area, so that even if a young family farm wanted to expand, there was no chance of that ever happening because it was out.

      So now we're almost at a point where we're starting to see land, land that's going to be probably 50, 60 quarters of land that's going to be owned by cor­por­ations. And I don't have any disagreement with cor­por­ations, but I do respect the fact that if there was a–given a choice to go to a family farm to expand rural economic dev­elop­ment versus someone that's a large affiliated farm, I'd sooner give it to the young family farm and gen­era­tion and all.

      Unfor­tunately, we see members opposite, they look at the big dollars and that seems to be the choice that they choose to go with. In fact, you know what's–it was so ironic, hon­our­able Deputy Speaker, is when they started to have meetings.

      And I'll refer to Ste. Rose, Manitoba, where there was 200‑and‑some-odd beef producers when this all started up. Not one individual was even wanting to be there. They were high-tailing out of that geographic area, because they did not want to even have a con­ver­sa­tion with any of the producers. Much like to the point when they closed the jail we had in Dauphin, Manitoba, what we had at that time. The Justice minister showed up, he made the an­nounce­ment to the city, put the car in drive and let's get out of Dauphin before they have a meeting about the economic.

      So we want to talk about the economic dev­elop­ment of growth. Thank goodness to the Justice Minister sitting beside me here that he–now we're moving forward to rebuild–rebuild what this gov­ern­ment is all famous for, is to continue destroying com­mu­nities and op­por­tun­ities for dev­elop­ment in the long run.

An Honourable Member: Why is there less Crown land today?

Mr. Kostyshyn: So what we do see–and I hear a little bit of chirping in the back­ground there, but he refers to Crown–I'm sure it's hard for him to even say Crown lands, because he's a victim of the problem that we have in existence.

      But, honestly, you know what, we've had numer­ous discussions with Crown land repre­sen­tatives. They are patiently awaiting, as we move forward to bring fairness–to bring fairness to the young individual farmers, ranchers in this province.

      We're not going to go base it on who has the largest cheque and whether you even live in Manitoba or do you live in Alberta or do you live in Canada, period. That is where we are now in con­sul­ta­tion, and we'll be in con­sul­ta­tion for a while to develop the importance of what Crown lands was all about.

      So what we see is that op­por­tun­ities where genera­tional farmers were able to offload or sell property on the unit transfer op­por­tun­ities. And so we had Albertans, we had 'saskatans' moving in, small family farms choosing to come to Manitoba and continue esta­blish­ing their ranching operations.

      No, that wasn't good enough for that gov­ern­ment across the room. They'd just as soon say no, we're just going to make it out who's got the largest cheque, so they increased Crown land rates by 300 per cent. Six months before the election, well, let's cut it back because we're going into an election so we might lose out some votes in the long run.

So, let me tell you, I wish when there–when we get back to having these con­sul­ta­tions, I'll gladly enter­tain inviting the critic from Portage la Prairie, please come to Ste. Rose, Manitoba, and talk to the 200-and-some-odd ranchers that were there before The Crown Lands Act was changed and make that op­por­tun­ity because, sure as heck, deputy hon­our­able Speaker, is that these individuals choose to make tough decisions but they don't want to stand behind their decisions for the benefit of the agri­cul­ture people.

      At the end, I am really honoured to be the Agri­cul­ture Minister, and I will continue for the betterment of agri­cul­ture, and I hope members opposite, the critic especially, come with us. I'll even give you a pair of skates with us, yes.

      So, in closing, I would like to say–[interjection] Some­thing else? You're good? Okay.

      So, in conclusion, I will say this again: it's my honour to be the Agri­cul­ture Minister, second time around, and it's a privilege to be here and talk about the importance of what we have in this province. And we talk about the tariffs that we are dealing with today.

      And I know members opposite have their favourite colour, so to speak, that they would sooner have that side of the fence. I'm telling you–I want to tell you all–is that we, this gov­ern­ment, our Premier (Mr. Kinew), all stand together for the betterment of agri­cul­ture in the long run. We want to maintain rural economic dev­elop­ment and we will continue focusing on, with all of us from this side of the House, and not pick out the beneficial benefits of large cheques for the benefits of their party.

      Thank you so much, and it's my pleasure.

Mr. Konrad Narth (La Vérendrye): I don't know what to say. Wow, wow, wow. I–my job now, moving forward, is definitely to show Manitobans the gov­ern­ment that we have in charge right now because I'll reiterate what the title of their reso­lu­tion is, and it's Manitoba is Stronger Standing Together Against Donald Trump's Tariff Tax and Threats. And this is a reso­lu­tion that this NDP gov­ern­ment brought forward.

      And I thought, great. This is an op­por­tun­ity for us as Manitobans, as legis­lators of this House, to come together to work on a plan or at least for this gov­ern­ment to deliver the plan that they have to combat the tariff trade war threats that are coming out of the US currently.

      Instead, what I heard was absolutely disgusting yesterday. We heard from the Minister of Families (MLA Fontaine) for more than an hour speaking in circles about absolutely nothing of relevance to trade, nothing of relevance to trade for our country and our province. Nothing of relevance.

      So she stood up to talk about transgender rights of children in schools, and that was of importance, which none of us are disputing the importance in the general scene of our prov­incial politics, but it has nothing, zero, to do with trade relations between the United States and Canada. That trade relationship is im­por­tant to families in Manitoba. It's im­por­tant to all of our neighbours.

      On this side of the House, we represent small busi­nesses, small-busi­ness owners, the staff that work for those busi­nesses.

* (16:30)

      And unfor­tunately the Minister of Families (MLA Fontaine) seemed to be so out of touch with reality, and it may be because of working a lifetime career in social services where you're protected by the gov­ern­ment and the taxpayers of our province in a job that you don't need to show your value to our economy. And that's true. These are positions that they fill on that side of the House that you don't need to show the relevance that it has to the economic position of our country.

      So we had the Minister of Families stand up yester­day talking about how patriotic they were to our country. This is the same person that's reluctant–this minister is the same minister that's reluctant to sing O Canada, reluctant to stand up for O Canada. And it gets worse than that. It gets worse than that. Anybody that knows the Minister of Families also knows–anyone who's spoken to her knows that in her–how she feels. But it gets better than that. In her master's–I found this quote and I'd like to share it with Manitobans. In her own master's thesis, she wrote: Canadian nationalism is a racist ideology.

      The Minister of Families who spoke for more than an hour yesterday about the trade position of our country is the same person that made a quote saying Canadian nationalism–

The Deputy Speaker: Order. Order. While the motion is quite broad, you have gone beyond relevance, the border of relevance. So I'd ask that you bring it back to the reso­lu­tion.

Mr. Narth: I'm speaking to definitely Manitoba standing up against a trade war. Disappointed in our gov­ern­ment and the leadership in our gov­ern­ment not showing any relevance through­out two days of debate. But I wanted Manitobans to know exactly how they function. On this side of the House, myself, many others, are small-busi­ness owners, have been small-busi­ness owners, and we know that a tariff war directly threatens to speed drain cor­por­ate money out of our province. This is the reality of what's going on. This gov­ern­ment had absolutely no plan.

      We listened to the Agri­cul­ture Minister, which I'm actually embarrassed for this gov­ern­ment right now. I'm embarrassed for this gov­ern­ment, and I should be on the other side, happy that I can showcase this to the great people of La Vérendrye. But instead, I feel some level of embar­rass­ment that this is the gov­ern­ment that we have repre­sen­ting all of us today. And it's really, really unfor­tunate.

      So I'd like to use some examples that are maybe closer to home because me repre­sen­ting La Vérendrye, the furthest southeast corner of Manitoba, we have close relationships with friends on the US side, busi­nesses that our busi­nesses rely on, agri­cul­ture com­modity trade. But we do realize that this is a gov­ern­ment with a caucus disconnected from busi­ness and agri­cul­ture. Unfor­tunately, we heard 24 and a half minutes of the disconnect from agri­cul­ture by the Ag Minister.

      But an example that I could use is Evolution Wheel, a Winnipeg start‑up busi­ness, owned by Dennis [phonetic] Hird, a great, local Winnipeg entrepreneur that started an industrial wheel company that manufactures wheels and the rubber right here in Winnipeg, Manitoba. These are the busi­nesses that we need to be proud of. These are people that are innovative entrepreneurs that employ people, that feed families and contribute back to our province. One in three small‑busi­ness owners generated over half of their sales with the US. One in three rely more than 50 per cent on the US for trade.

      So right now we need to be coming up with solu­tions instead of bickering back and forth on political ideologies, as we've seen over the last two days. Evolution Wheel was recently interviewed and had made mention that they are left with no other choice but to continue to compete with the 25 per cent tariff.

      So, right now there is no plan from the gov­ern­ment, no plan what­so­ever other than potential subsidization. But other than that, no plan for this busi­ness owner to compete with the tariffs and compete with the American counterparts that are within his industry. He's forced to pivot. That's the reality right now.

      And the Agri­cul­ture Minister laughs. The Minister of Families went on a rambling rampage for an–over an hour about nothing relevant to trade. But a busi­ness owner in Winnipeg is left no option other than to pivot and split part of their operation into the United States. This is what they're looking at. Derek himself had mentioned that counter‑tariffs will only add to that burden.

      So we look at what are the solutions that we've heard? Well, we've heard taking liquor off liquor store shelves in the gov­ern­ment‑run stores within Winnipeg and our largest centres in Manitoba. The Finance Minister's solution is a tax deferral. I wish the Finance Minister was here. And I don't know if it's really frustrating–oh, there, the Finance–sorry–

The Deputy Speaker: Order. Order.

      We can't reflect on whether a member is in the Chamber or not in the Chamber.

Mr. Narth: Thank you, deputy hon­our­able Speaker, and I'm sorry for that. I should've known.

      It has been clear to see that this gov­ern­ment doesn't have an under­standing of basic economic theory. We've seen that time and time again now. But this goes further. It is now clear that the gov­ern­ment doesn't have a basic under­standing of busi­ness financial accounting. And I'll explain it for the Finance Minister. Unfor­tunately, I have an accounting back­ground, so these are things that fun­da­mentally frustrate me when I look at them at face value.

      But tax deferral is tax owed. So that's a liability on their financial statement. What that means is it's a liability that affects the company's liquidity and their ability to access funding. So, right now, as we have Manitoba busi­nesses, like I've stated with Evolution Wheel, needing to continue on with busi­ness, the NDP gov­ern­ment comes with a saviour plan of deferral of taxation, which accomplishes nothing.

      But I guess with this NDP gov­ern­ment that is absolutely fearless of debt, they think that it's no big deal to accumulate debt and that the busi­ness should be thankful of carrying further liability. That's not reality when busi­nesses–small busi­nesses, medium busi­nesses–go to the bank. They–the bank looks at their liquidity and they see that this is a carried liability.

      So I think we all can agree, and it's safe to say that everyone was disappointed to wake up on Tuesday morning and realize that this threat of a 25 per cent tariff on all Canadian products was fulfilled by President Trump. Since the president's inauguration, we have seen a serious threat to our cross‑border trade and relationship with the United States in general. Since the first threat, we have heard many commit­ments from the Premier (Mr. Kinew) and also the Prime Minister, but nothing to support and build our economy.

      We need to act, but I am convinced that trade retaliation is not the answer out of this mess. Donald Trump is in office for four years, and he has set the stage for our relationship during that time. The only way to combat the effects on our economy is major deregulation and economic incentives in sectors that are most dependent on US trade. And I'll reiterate that: We need to deregulate and provide incentives for busi­nesses in Manitoba right now, today. Talking about what may have been done or may not have been done in the past isn't going to sign the paycheques for Evolution Wheel. Instead of retaliation on trade of products that sub­stan­tially affect our citizens and insignificantly affect theirs, we need to instead give our economy the tools to compete.

      The most certainty that we can see from retaliation is that it's going to push the president to increase tariffs in days to come, which could outright cripple our economy.

* (16:40)

The Speaker in the Chair

      We instead need to remain competitive with US companies, making it harder on the people of the United States and their economy. This will in turn force them to put pressure on their gov­ern­ment and their President. We see sub­stan­tial regula­tion and taxation in each of the main trade sectors within our economy.

      My region of the province is significantly based on agri­cul­ture and manufacturing. Within these two sectors of our economy, we can easily see far more than 25 per cent gov­ern­ment burden on production, as well as sig­ni­fi­cant op­por­tun­ities for gov­ern­ment to enable growth.

      The same approach can be seen and used across all major sectors within our economy. Examples of these taxes and regula­tions that make up more than 25 per cent of costs of production are things like the carbon tax: the carbon tax that we've been talking about–Canadians have been talking about–for two years now.

      Also, production levies, payroll tax, cor­por­ate tax and most im­por­tantly, income tax. If we can cut taxes and regula­tions by more than 25 per cent for our local busi­nesses and manufacturers, it will allow them to not only compete, but also provide them more flexibility to react to ongoing market changes while keeping their employees happy and working.

      This not only will allow the economy stability, but avoids the alternative government reaction, which is debt‑driven subsidies, which we have seen and learned in recent history can be devastating to inflation and the stability of our economy.

      We are an economy heavily dependent on exports of raw or near-raw materials that–our effect of retalia­tion is insignificant in the grand scheme of our trade position. Gov­ern­ments should never get into busi­ness, and get out of the way of busi­ness. It should be gov­ern­ment's position right now to step out of the way of busi­ness and the economic growth of our province and country by allowing busi­nesses the tools they need to remain competitive.

      The more money left in the pockets of Manitobans, the more money left in our economy. This trade war can be won with less gov­ern­ment involvement instead of more.

      Thank you.

Hon. Uzoma Asagwara (Minister of Health, Seniors and Long-Term Care): Hon­our­able Speaker, on this side of the House, we are proud to be Canadian–proud to be Canadian. Unapologetically, with our full chests we can say we are proud to be Canadian.

      In stark contrast, on that side of the House, you have the member for Borderland (Mr. Guenter) making comments about how his friends and the people he connects with and the voices he's listening to are people who want to be Americans.

      You have the member for Borderland standing up while Manitobans and Canadians are worried about very real economic con­se­quences as a result of Trump's damaging and reckless tariffs, standing up and talking about becoming American.

      Hon­our­able Speaker, it should concern every single person in this House and every single Manitoban that the PC caucus is comfortable with members of their team standing up and proclaiming that they want to be Americans. That is truly unacceptable.

      Hon­our­able Speaker, in addition to that, in an environ­ment where Manitobans are worried about tariff threats, in an environ­ment where Canadians are coming together in in­cred­ible ways we have not seen in a long, long time, you have members opposite like the member for Fort Whyte (Mr. Khan), who is going out and thanking Donald Trump for his tariffs.

      Hon­our­able Speaker, it should quite frankly frighten Manitobans that there is a PC caucus, in the midst of the economic challenges that we're facing not only in Canada but certainly globally as a result of these tariff threats and realities, that are championing the very same person who is inflicting this harm and instability on Manitobans and Canadians.

      And so I will say it again so that Manitobans can know in their minds and in their hearts, on this side of the House, this gov­ern­ment is proud to be Canadian.

      Hon­our­able Speaker, Manitobans, Canadians, I've heard from so many folks. In fact, just yesterday night, I'm leaving the Leg., it's dark, and I see a woman walking past the Legislature, and she walks up the steps of this in­cred­ible building and is trying to take a selfie of herself with the flag, the in­cred­ible Canadian flag that is now outside of our building reminding Manitobans each and every day that we are united as a country and a province. And I was thrilled to help her get a good photo on the steps of this Legislature with that flag behind her and to chat briefly about how proud we are that Manitobans are coming together in this way.

      During a time where Manitobans, Canadians, are really unifying, are going out of their way and above and beyond to support our local Manitoban economy, to buy Canadian; during a time where folks are having con­ver­sa­tions with their children about what it means to be Canadian and all the privileges and the rights and pro­tec­tions it affords us and that we will always, on this side of the House, work to uphold and protect; during this time, members opposite are doing just that: the opposite.

      They continue to do the work of dividing Manitobans, driving wedges in between com­mu­nities, taking an approach that is harmful not only for today but will be harmful for tomorrow and for years to come. It is so im­por­tant. I am so grateful, Hon­our­able Speaker, that during this time of economic challenge and uncertainty, we have not only the most popular Premier (Mr. Kinew) in the country leading Manitoba through this time, we have a person who unapologetically stands on the side of the citizens he represents and focuses on bringing people together.

      Manitoba has a Premier that stands with families who have been impacted and affected by tragedy, in contrast to members opposite, member for Fort Whyte. In the midst of these tariff threats, in the midst of all of these challenges, cannot find it within himself to apologize for the harms he partici­pated in in the last election here in Manitoba.

      Hon­our­able Speaker, I think we've all learned, we've all watched and we've seen the impacts of not learning from mistakes and not committing to doing better. I sincerely hope that during this time, at some point, while Canadians role model the behaviour they should be seeing from members opposite, that they will catch up, that they will join team Canada and finally start focusing on bringing people together, on pushing back against these damaging tariff threats, and on being repre­sen­tatives that actually proudly represent this country and represent the voices of the Manitobans they were elected to serve.

      Hon­our­able Speaker, the tariff tax is a real attack on Canada. It's part of a broader, sweeping attack on human rights that we're seeing. It's so im­por­tant that Canadians not only stand united against these Trump tariff threats but also against the harmful rhetoric and policies and division that we're seeing that we know has an impact on our own Canadian soil.

* (16:50)

      You know, I've had the privilege and the pleasure of putting on a Team Canada jersey and uniform, many years ago, back when my knees were in much better shape. And I had the privilege of travelling the world and meeting with folks from all different back­grounds and countries who were also very proud to don the uniforms of the countries they represented. And everywhere we went, people were so excited to connect with Canadians. And we were always so excited to learn and connect with folks from other countries.

      And the thing that I heard con­sistently when I was a younger person, in my twenties, playing basketball, repre­sen­ting our country, was that people would always reflect on how welcoming Canada seemed to be. People who had the op­por­tun­ity to compete in Canada or travel there, or have loved ones in our country, they talked about the economic op­por­tun­ities Canada provides. They talked about the cultural connections that Canada facilitates and fosters. They talked about: Wow, what it must be for you to put your Canadian flag on your uniform, on your backpack, and anywhere you go, people are happy to see you.

      I have always carried that with me.

      And, Hon­our­able Speaker, during a time where we reflect on what it means to be Canadian and what makes our Canadian economy strong, it is really our diversity as a country and as a province here in Manitoba that generates so much of our economic strength, which is part of the reason why our gov­ern­ment stands on the side of human rights, which is why our gov­ern­ment celebrates the diversity in Manitoba. Our diversity is one of our greatest economic drivers. It is some­thing to be celebrated, to be protected, to be enhanced.

      And so, we stand up for Manitobans. Our Premier (Mr. Kinew), our Minister of Finance (MLA Sala), our Minister of Busi­ness and jobs, our whole team from day one worked very hard and swiftly to ensure that Manitoba jobs are protected and we'll continue to do that work.

      But it's im­por­tant to note that when we say we're protecting the jobs of Manitobans, we're talking about all Manitobans. We're not saying some Manitobans or these Manitobans. We're saying all Manitobans of all identities.

      It's deeply con­cern­ing, Hon­our­able Speaker, in a climate, in an environ­ment where we see these escalating attacks on targeted and already marginalized com­mu­nities. One would hope that in this time, we would see members opposite, including the member for Fort Whyte (Mr. Khan), who was the face of a targeted attack against trans kids in the last election, take this moment and then use it as an op­por­tun­ity to say two very im­por­tant words that can contribute to healing: I'm sorry.

      I think that people forget that in our country, we have this in­cred­ible foundation that people that came before us worked very hard to build and esta­blish, where you can be a young two-spirit kid, a young queer or trans kid who has dreams of becoming a doctor, a nurse, an allied health-care pro­fes­sional–I'm talking about health care because I'm the Health Minister; I'll need more of you folks on the front lines. But, you can dream big. And your dreams in our country will be met with love and support and com­passion and affirmation.

      And if Donald Trump comes for your job when you grow up and you're an adult working in our workforce, your Premier will protect you and your job. That is a privilege that we have in Canada, we have in Manitoba, that not everybody has everywhere. It's an im­por­tant distinction that we must recog­nize sets us apart in ways that really, really matter.

      And, again, it's strength in not only our collective social fabric, not only our health-care system, but our economy, whether it's Harvard, Wall Street Journal, whether it's Stanford, whether it's–oh my goodness, there's so many different busi­ness magazines and reviews that have been done that have shown definitively that diversity results in innovation, enhances col­lab­o­ration, sparks and ignites invest­ment, drives economies. This is a fact. It's been scientifically proven. It's evidence‑based. It's not just, you know, political rhetoric. The science actually tells us this is the case. It's an advantage we have in our Canadian infra­structure and economy. It's an advantage we have in Manitoba that we should be very proud of.

      In our province, our gov­ern­ment has taken steps to not only be very clear that we stand on the side of a strong economy, we'll push back against these damaging tariff threats. We've been really clear that we're going to do what is necessary to make more visible what it means to have innovation on the ground for small busi­nesses, what it means to lift people up and make sure they have the op­por­tun­ities to thrive in our economic market.

      And we've done that in a way–and I'm really proud to say it–in a way, again, that brings people together. You can do the hard things in a way that isn't divisive. You can do the hard things in a way that doesn't leave people out of the con­ver­sa­tion.

      I think it's very bizarre to see members opposite choose to do the opposite of that. It's actually much easier just to be kind. It's actually much easier just to bring people in. It's much easier just to say that everyone should be treated with kindness and respect–much easier to do that. Much more success comes from that.

      And so, on this side of the House, Hon­our­able Speaker, we are going to continue to do the work of listening to Manitobans, bringing people together, being proud to be Canadian, investing in making sure our busi­nesses can be suc­cess­ful, that our health-care system, which, to be very clear, these tariff threats in realities will have a direct impact on our health-care system. And so it is even more con­cern­ing when you hear the member for Fort Whyte (Mr. Khan) talking about priva­tizing health care and thanking Donald Trump for tariffs.

      Those are very scary comments to be making when we know that tariffs are not only going to damage our economy, they're going to damage our health-care economy as well. It shows what little regard you have for Manitobans to make flippant statements about priva­tizing health care and not talking about what you actually mean. You either don't understand what you're talking about, or you don't care. Neither one of those is acceptable.

      Fun­da­mentally, what Manitobans have been shown very quickly, like, in an–at an alarming rate of quickness, is how disconnected fun­da­mentally the PCs are from the realities of Manitobans, how completely detached they are from what the priorities of Canadians are.

      I think it really fun­da­mentally also speaks to this gap between why we're here and who we serve and what it is that we want to see happening in our com­mu­nities. You know, we work to bring those things together.

      On that side of the House, huge gap in between those two things.

      I do want to acknowledge these comments in the–that were made by the MLA for La Vérendrye in terms of social service workers, and I, because I know he won't do it, I want to apologize on his behalf to those folks who work in social services, who work every single day in our com­mu­nities in Manitoba, who contribute to our economy, who are all very nervous about what's going on in terms of these Trump tariff threats and whose work is invaluable to Manitobans. That member stood up in this House and mocked their jobs, criticized their employment. 

      On this side of the House, we're talking about, and we're committed to, protecting Manitobans' jobs. On that side of the House the member for La Vérendrye (Mr. Narth) made fun of the jobs of social service workers, minimized the impact they have to our economy, to the com­mu­nities and the Manitobans they serve each and every day.

      Hon­our­able Speaker, that is disgraceful, and I know that that member will not apologize, so I'll say it again. I apologize on his behalf. Every single Manitoban who's employed, contributing to our economy, making a difference across a myriad of systems, you are valued. We respect you, and we will fight to protect your jobs.

      Hon­our­able Speaker, I do want to take a moment to talk a bit about the campaign–

The Speaker: Order, please.

      When this matter is again before the House, the hon­our­able minister will have 13 minutes remaining.

      The hour being 5 o'clock, the House is adjourned and stands adjourned until 1:30 p.m. on Monday.


 

 


LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF MANITOBA

Thursday, March 6, 2025

CONTENTS


Vol. 22b

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS

Introduction of Bills

Bill 27–The Income Tax Amendment Act

Sala  475

Bill 223–The Official Time Amendment Act, 2025

Schuler 475

Bill 28–The Manitoba Hydro Amendment Act

Sala  475

Bill 42–The Buy Canadian Act (Government Purchases Act Amended)

Sandhu  476

Bill 37–The Manitoba Financial Services Authority Act and Amendments to Various Other Acts

Sala  476

Bill 10–The Residential Tenancies Amendment Act

Sandhu  476

Bill 25–The Public-Private Partnerships Transparency and Accountability Act

Sandhu  476

Bill 26–The Vital Statistics Amendment Act

Sandhu  477

Bill 31–The Property Controls for Grocery Stores and Supermarkets Act (Various Acts Amended)

Sandhu  477

Bill 206–The Homeowner Protection from Unsolicited Purchase Offers Act

Wasyliw   477

Bill 17–The Public Schools Amendment Act (Nutrition Equality for Lasting Learning Outcomes)

Schmidt 478

Bill 18–The Public Schools Amendment Act (Indigenous Languages of Instruction)

Schmidt 478

Bill 19–The Public Schools Amendment Act (Safe Schools)

Schmidt 478

Bill 20–The Community Child Care Standards Amendment and Education Administration Amendment Act

Schmidt 479

Bill 40– An Act respecting "O Canada" and Other Observances and Land and Treaty Acknowledgements in Schools (Education Administration Act and Public Schools Act Amended)

Schmidt 479

Bill 39–The Public Schools Amendment Act (Campaign Financing for School Trustees)

Schmidt 479

Bill 21–The Protecting Youth in Sports Act

Kennedy  480

Bill 22–The Environment Amendment and Waste Reduction and Prevention Amendment Act

Moyes 480

Bill 13–The Minor Amendments and Corrections Act, 2025

Wiebe  481

Bill 23–The Public Interest Expression Defence Act

Wiebe  481

Bill 32–The Residential Tenancies Amendment Act (Measures to Address Unlawful Activities)

Wiebe  481

Bill 35–The Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation Amendment Act

Wiebe  482

Bill 36–The Drivers and Vehicles Amendment and Highway Traffic Amendment Act

Wiebe  482

Bill 30–The Election Financing Amendment and Elections Amendment Act

Wiebe  482

Bill 24–The Workers Compensation Amendment Act

Marcelino  482

Bill 29–The Workplace Safety and Health Amendment Act

Marcelino  483

Bill 33–The Public Health Amendment Act

Asagwara  483

Bill 41–The Reporting of Supports for Child Survivors of Sexual Assault (Trained Health Professionals and Evidence Collection Kits) Amendment Act

Asagwara  483

Bill 34–The Highway Traffic Amendment Act (Motor Carrier Enforcement)

Naylor 483

Bill 38–The Highway Traffic Amendment Act (Traffic Safety Measures)

Naylor 484

Committee Reports

Standing Committee on Public Accounts

Second Report

Guenter 484

Ministerial Statements

International Women's Day

Fontaine  485

Byram   486

Members' Statements

World Lymphedema Day

Schott 487

Lymphedema Awareness Day

Ewasko  487

Recognizing Women in Southdale Community

Cable  488

I Love to Read Month

Schuler 488

Audrey Vail

Compton  488

Oral Questions

US Tariffs on Canadian Goods

Ewasko  489

Kinew   490

Checkmate Government Relations

Ewasko  490

Kinew   491

Manitoba Trade Office in Washington

Ewasko  491

Kinew   491

Development of Manitoba's Natural Resources

Stone  492

Sala  492

Changes to Canada-US Trade Agreement

Bereza  493

Kostyshyn  493

Manitoba's Minister of Agriculture

Bereza  494

Kostyshyn  494

Metis, Michif CFS Agencies

Byram   494

Fontaine  494

Allied Health-Care Professionals

Cook  495

Asagwara  495

Hospitals in Winnipeg

Cook  495

Asagwara  496

Allied Health-Care Professionals

Lamoureux  496

Asagwara  496

Buy Canadian Initiative

Compton  497

Kinew   497

Constituent with Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Jackson  497

Asagwara  497

ORDERS OF THE DAY

GOVERNMENT BUSINESS

Government Resolution

Reappointment of the Manitoba Ombudsman

Fontaine  498

Debate on Government Resolution

Manitoba is Stronger Standing Together Against Donald Trump's Tariff Tax and Threats

Stone  499

Kennedy  501

Bereza  503

Kostyshyn  505

Narth  509

Asagwara  511