
To view PDF files, you must have a copy of the Adobe Acrobat Reader which is available as a free download.
![]()

PHIA was enacted in 1997 to ensure individual access to, and privacy of, personal health information maintained by health care providers, government and local public bodies. The act calls for a review process to ensure it continues to address access and privacy rights in a manner that meets health system requirements and citizen expectations.
PHIA’s companion statute The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA) contains a similar review clause, and consequently, the reviews were coordinated.
The PHIA review process began with the establishment of a PHIA Review Steering Committee in September 2002. This committee, which included representation from government, regional health authorities and health professions, researched and developed background material and generally managed the review process.
A discussion paper profiled several issues that have been raised since PHIA was enacted. The discussion paper also invited review participants to comment on any issue of interest or concern to them that fit within the scope of PHIA.
Public consultations began with the release of the
discussion paper titled: A
Review of The Personal Health Information Act: Tell Us What You Think
on February
9, 2004.
Between February 9 and May 11, 2004, over 1000 discussion documents were circulated to regional health authorities, health care facilities, regulatory bodies, local public bodies, community organizations and many others who expressed interest in the review. The discussion document was also available on the PHIA review web site.
The public participation component of the PHIA review included public hearings in Brandon, Winnipeg and Thompson, held on April 26, May 3 and May 11, 2004 respectively, to provide interested parties the opportunity to address PHIA in an open and public forum.
In addition, records show that the PHIA review web site was visited nearly 3000 times between February 9 and May 14, 2004. The discussion document Tell Us What You Think was accessed online over 3350 times during the same time period. At the close of the public consultation component of the PHIA review, nearly 90 submissions had been received from members of the public, regional health authorities, health professionals, health care facilities, research organizations, regulatory bodies, professional associations, community organizations, municipalities, national institutions, and many other groups. A more detailed list of review participants is attached at the end of this report for reference.
The majority of these submissions were made in writing or submitted by email. Eighteen participants took advantage of an online submission form, accessible through the government's PHIA review web site. A total of 22 individuals made oral presentations at public hearings.
As the PHIA review is a public process, written submissions have been made available to the public in the Legislative Library at 200 Vaughan Street in Winnipeg. Some of the written submissions have been severed, where necessary, to protect personal information and the identities of individuals who provided personal opinions. Comments provided by individuals at public hearings were not severed, as these submissions were made in an open and public forum. Identities of organizations in connection with their submissions are also public.
The views, suggestions and ideas Manitobans offered through this process have made an important contribution to the overall review process. We are committed to ensuring that this legislation will continue to address access and privacy rights in a manner consistent with both health system requirements and citizens' expectations.
In addition, 18 private individuals provided written submissions.
Public Hearing Presentations* Indicates public speakers who also provided a written copy of their presentation.
For more information, please contact: |
Legislative Unit |