Enhanced Efficiency Additives for Nitrogen - How they Work

Prepared by John Heard, MAFRD Soil Fertility Specialist (FPE)

There has been an increase in the number of products now available for increasing the efficiency of applied nitrogen. The following is a review of the various products and their activity.

In Manitoba we traditionally presume the efficiency of nitrogen applied for crops is typically 40-60%. That means that 40-60% of the nitrogen is not taken up by the crop, some being lost permanently through volatilization, deep leaching and denitrification and some being temporarily tied up or immobilized by soil microbes to decompose straw. Conversely, crops are obtaining the remainder of their nitrogen needs elsewhere (residual soil N, mineralization of organic matter, manure and previous pulse crops, etc).

Additives or enhancers do not increase yields over traditional nitrogen products but under loss conditions they minimize those losses so more is available for the crop. There are 3 main types of enhanced efficiency products based on their activity.

  1. Nitrification inhibitors: delays the conversion of ammonia-form nitrogen (anhydrous ammonia, urea and the urea fraction of UAN solution) to the nitrate form which is vulnerable to leaching and denitrification. The NH4+ form has a positive charge and is held on the cation exchange complex which prevents any leaching.
  2. Urease inhibitors: delays the breakdown of the urea molecule (CO(NH2)2 ) into the ammonia form (NH3)by inhibiting activity of the urease enzyme. It is this free ammonia form that is vulnerable to volatilization loss from surface applications or causes seed-burn when seed-placed.
  3. Controlled release: Urea form N (CO(NH2)2 ) can be bound to molecules that are degraded slowly or enclosed within coatings. The most common is ESN urea (44-0-0), enclosed within a polymer coating that allows urea to diffuse out.

Soil nitrogen reactions are described in Figure 1 below, where those leading reactions to losses are labelled in red with red arrows. The points where these enhancers prevent loss are shown as the lettered box (A = nitrification inhibitor, B = urease inhibitor and C = controlled release) as described above.

Those products Manitoba growers are most likely to hear promoted are listed in Table 1 below.

Figure 1. Soil nitrogen reactions leading to nitrogen fertilizer losses (adapted from C. Grant)

soil nitrogen reactions

Table 1.  Enhanced nitrogen efficiency products and relative cost (winter 2011).

Product Active Ingredient N Product A. Nitrification inhibitor B. Urease inhibitor C. Controlled release

Relative cost if Urea $0.50/lb N

ESN Polymer coating Urea 44-0-0     yes $0.65/lb N
Agrotain NBPT

Urea 46-0-0,

UAN 28-0-0

  yes  

$0.57/lb N

SuperU NBPT and DCD Urea 46-0-0 yes yes   $0.62-$0.65/lb N
Agrotain Plus NBPT and DCD UAN 28-0-0 yes yes  

?

Ammonium Thiosulphate 15-0-0-20S UAN 28-0-0 slight slight   ?
N-Serve* nitrapyrin Anhydrous ammonia 82-0-0 yes     Extra $8/ac
Instinct* nitrapyrin UAN 28-0-0 yes     ?
Nutrisphere* maleic itaconic co-polymer calcium salt

Urea 46-0-0

UAN 28-0-0

? ?   $0.57/lb N

*not currently registered for use in Canada

The products ESN and Agrotain have been available in the Prairies for some time and have been demonstrated to provide protection against losses. The NBPT and DCD containing products Agrotain Plus and SuperU are relatively new, but both inhibitors are effective. Ammonium thiosulphate has been evaluated as a nitrification and volatilization inhibitor with some success in North Dakota studies but without affect in Canadian studies. It would be considered inferior to Agrotain in terms of reducing volatilization losses.

Some of these products (marked *) are not currently registered for use in Canada. N-Serve (nitrapyrin) was registered in the past but very little if any was marketed in western Canada. Instinct is a newer formulation of nitrapyrin for use with UAN solution and is currently undergoing extensive US testing. Nutrisphere has been evaluated in Canada and much of the US with little success as either a nitrification or urease inhibitor.

Historically in Manitoba, growers have achieved improvements in nitrogen efficiency through application placement and timing management (Table 2).

Table 2.

PLACEMENT

TIMING

SOURCE

RELATIVE EFFICIENCY

Broadcast/incorporated

fall

40%

Subsurface banded

fall

Ammonia form N

50%

Broadcast/incorporated

spring

50%

Subsurface banded

spring

60%

The temporary loss of nitrogen to immobilization is minimized by these same management practices, ie placement of nitrogen in a tight band separate from the crop residue.

The dilemma for the grower is that when application timing and placement are optimum and the weather is not conducive to loss, these enhanced products will provide no yield advantage over traditional N sources. Yet they all add cost.

If the placement and timing is not optimum and conditions are excessively wet causing loss of nitrate-nitrogen, the cost of the products offering nitrification inhibition or slow release are beneficial. Similarly for surface broadcast urea or UAN, if rainfall is not received after application, the protection of NBPT containing products (like Agrotain) is warranted.

References:

Franzen, D. 2010. Slow-release nitrogen fertilizers and nitrogen additives for field crops. North Central Soil Fertility Conf. Proc. Vol.26 pp.13-30.